Andrew Morris
P Minnesota Twins| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | MIX3 levels | 26 | 24 | 133 | 2.37 | 2.41 | 24.5% | 5.9% | — | K 19.8% · BB 6.2% · FIP 2.88 |
| 2025 | 23 | AAAMIN | 21 | 19 | 95 | 4.09 | 3.62 | 22.4% | 7.0% | — | K 19.2% · BB 6.3% · FIP 3.61 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 66 | 5 | 81 | 4.11 | 3.00 | 21.2% | 7.2% | 1.5 | K 21.5% · BB 7.2% · FIP 3.04 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBMIN | 50 | 0 | 53 | 3.84 | 3.69 | 22.4% | 6.8% | 0.6 | |
| 2028PROJ88% MLB | 26 | MLBMIN | 54 | 0 | 57 | 3.81 | 3.74 | 22.5% | 6.8% | 0.6 | |
| 2029PROJ91% MLB | 27 | MLBMIN | 45 | 0 | 47 | 3.83 | 3.81 | 22.5% | 7.0% | 0.4 |
Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Twins | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.29 | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Twins | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 1.10 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 18 | 17 | 84 | 357 | 79 | 19 | 4 | 94% | 4.7 | 16.6% | 6.2% | 10.4% | 1.4% | 2.88 | 3.23 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 18 | 17 | 84 | 357 | 79 | 19 | 4 | 94% | 4.7 | 22.1% | 5.3% | 16.8% | 1.1% | 2.88 | 2.52 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 24 | 133 | 542 | 133 | 32 | 6 | 92% | 5.1 | 19.8% | 6.2% | 13.7% | 1.2% | 2.37 | 2.88 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 24 | 133 | 542 | 133 | 32 | 6 | 92% | 5.1 | 19.8% | 6.2% | 13.7% | 1.2% | 2.37 | 2.88 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 26 | 24 | 133 | 542 | 133 | 32 | 6 | 92% | 5.1 | 24.5% | 5.9% | 18.6% | 1.1% | 2.37 | 2.41 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AAA MLE | St. Paul Saints | 21 | 19 | 95 | 398 | 89 | 28 | 11 | 90% | 4.5 | 19.2% | 6.3% | 12.9% | 2.4% | 4.09 | 3.61 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AAA MLE | St. Paul Saints | 21 | 19 | 95 | 398 | 89 | 28 | 11 | 90% | 4.5 | 19.2% | 6.3% | 12.9% | 2.4% | 4.09 | 3.61 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AAA RAW | St. Paul Saints | 21 | 19 | 95 | 398 | 89 | 28 | 11 | 90% | 4.5 | 22.4% | 7.0% | 15.3% | 2.8% | 4.09 | 3.62 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 66 | 5 | 81 | 349 | 74 | 25 | 5 | 8% | 1.2 | 21.5% | 7.2% | 14.3% | 1.5% | 4.11 | 3.04 | +1.5 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 66 | 5 | 81 | 349 | 74 | 25 | 5 | 8% | 1.2 | 21.5% | 7.2% | 14.3% | 1.5% | 4.11 | 3.04 | +1.5 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 66 | 5 | 81 | 349 | 74 | 25 | 5 | 8% | 1.2 | 21.2% | 7.2% | 14.0% | 1.4% | 4.11 | 3.00 | +1.5 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 64 | 3 | 74 | 321 | 69 | 23 | 5 | 5% | 1.2 | 21.5% | 7.2% | 14.3% | 1.6% | 4.40 | 3.05 | +1.3 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | MIN | 50 | 0 | 53 | 224 | 50 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.4% | 6.8% | 15.6% | 2.3% | 3.84 | 3.69 | +0.6 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | MIN | 61 | 0 | 64 | 272 | 61 | 19 | 6 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.5% | 6.8% | 15.7% | 2.3% | 3.80 | 3.73 | +0.6 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | MIN | 49 | 0 | 52 | 219 | 49 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.5% | 7.0% | 15.5% | 2.4% | 3.82 | 3.80 | +0.5 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIN | 44 | 0 | 46 | 196 | 44 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.3% | 7.1% | 15.2% | 2.6% | 3.88 | 3.91 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIN | 37 | 0 | 39 | 163 | 35 | 12 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.7% | 7.4% | 14.3% | 2.7% | 4.00 | 4.08 | +0.2 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIN | 29 | 0 | 30 | 128 | 27 | 10 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.0% | 7.7% | 13.3% | 2.9% | 4.17 | 4.29 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | MIN | 54 | 0 | 57 | 241 | 54 | 16 | 6 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.5% | 6.8% | 15.7% | 2.4% | 3.81 | 3.74 | +0.6 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | MIN | 45 | 0 | 47 | 198 | 45 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.5% | 7.0% | 15.5% | 2.5% | 3.83 | 3.81 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIN | 41 | 0 | 43 | 182 | 41 | 13 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.3% | 7.1% | 15.2% | 2.6% | 3.89 | 3.92 | +0.3 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIN | 34 | 0 | 36 | 152 | 33 | 11 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.7% | 7.4% | 14.3% | 2.7% | 4.01 | 4.09 | +0.2 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIN | 28 | 0 | 29 | 122 | 26 | 9 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.0% | 7.7% | 13.3% | 2.9% | 4.18 | 4.30 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 265 | 3 | 285 | 1214 | 267 | 87 | 28 | 1% | 1.1 | 22.0% | 7.1% | 14.8% | 2.3% | 4.04 | 3.41 | +3.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 186 | 2 | 200 | 851 | 187 | 61 | 20 | 1% | 1.1 | 22.0% | 7.1% | 14.8% | 2.3% | 4.04 | 3.41 | +2.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 132 | 65 | 394 | 1649 | 319 | 106 | 27 | 49% | 3.0 | 19.4% | 6.4% | 12.9% | 1.6% | 3.24 | 3.16 | +3.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 67 | 33 | 200 | 837 | 162 | 54 | 14 | 49% | 3.0 | 19.4% | 6.4% | 12.9% | 1.6% | 3.24 | 3.16 | +2.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAASt. Paul Saints · 7 IPFIP 2.50 → 2.62 (+0.12)K% 17.9% → 15.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.86% | — | ×0.860 | 15.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.14% | — | ×0.900 | 6.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.50 → 2.62, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAASt. Paul Saints · 95 IPFIP 3.62 → 3.61 (−0.01)K% 22.4% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.36% | — | ×0.860 | 19.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.04% | — | ×0.900 | 6.33% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.76% | ÷1.253 | ×1.100 | 2.43% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 151).
Result: FIP 3.62 → 3.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAWichita Wind Surge · 62 IPFIP 1.90 → 2.47 (+0.57)K% 25.2% → 20.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.20% | — | ×0.810 | 20.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.60% | — | ×1.100 | 6.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.40% | ÷0.845 | ×1.200 | 0.57% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 1.90 → 2.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 38 IPFIP 2.03 → 2.69 (+0.66)K% 27.9% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.92% | — | ×0.770 | 21.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.55% | — | ×1.150 | 5.23% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.30% | ÷1.191 | ×1.250 | 1.36% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 138).
Result: FIP 2.03 → 2.69, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAASt. Paul Saints · 34 IPFIP 3.65 → 3.85 (+0.20)K% 19.6% → 16.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.57% | — | ×0.860 | 16.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.97% | — | ×0.900 | 7.17% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.17% | ÷1.039 | ×1.100 | 2.30% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).
Result: FIP 3.65 → 3.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AFort Myers Mighty Mussels · 49 IPFIP 2.19 → 3.06 (+0.87)K% 25.5% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.50% | — | ×0.740 | 18.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.50% | — | ×1.180 | 6.49% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.00% | ÷0.976 | ×1.300 | 1.33% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 2.19 → 3.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 36 IPFIP 2.94 → 3.45 (+0.52)K% 17.8% → 13.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.83% | — | ×0.770 | 13.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.10% | — | ×1.150 | 5.86% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.27% | ÷1.134 | ×1.250 | 1.40% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 127).
Result: FIP 2.94 → 3.45, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.9 | 53 | 22.0% | 7.3% | 0.89 | 3.99 |
| Todd Worrell ('97) | 1.7 | 55 | 23.4% | 7.5% | 0.95 | 3.58 |
| Fernando Salas ('19) | 2.4 | 54 | 23.1% | 7.3% | 1.05 | 3.91 |
| Jose Alvarez ('22) | 2.1 | 60 | 20.0% | 7.6% | 0.83 | 3.47 |
| Ramon Hernandez ('67-'77, 6 WAR*) | 2.2 | 61 | 19.7%* | 7.3%* | 0.77* | 3.65* |
| Mike Perez ('90-'97, 3 WAR*) | 1.7 | 58 | 18.5%* | 8.2%* | 0.88* | 3.86* |
| Tony Castillo ('88-'98, 4 WAR*) | 2.6 | 59 | 18.5%* | 7.3%* | 0.98* | 3.76* |