Abel Brito
P Lynchburg Hillcats| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 21 | ROKCLE | 10 | 7 | 37 | 6.75 | 3.39 | 23.0% | 10.1% | — | K 15.7% · BB 12.6% · FIP 4.79 | |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 12 | 12 | 36 | 7.68 | 4.23 | 17.0% | 16.5% | — | K 12.3% · BB 19.7% · FIP 4.98 | |
| 2024 | 23 | ALynchburg Hil… | 25 | 0 | 38 | 6.63 | 5.23 | 18.9% | 20.0% | — | K 14.0% · BB 23.6% · FIP 6.24 | |
| 2025 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBCLE | — | — | 0 | 5.20 | 5.20 | 21.5% | 14.9% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ36% MLB | 27 | MLBCLE | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5.13 | 5.15 | 21.7% | 14.4% | 0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Indians Red | 12 | 12 | 40 | 169 | 33 | 23 | 0 | 100% | 3.3 | 13.3% | 17.0% | -3.7% | 0.0% | 3.63 | 4.13 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL Indians Red | 12 | 12 | 40 | 169 | 33 | 23 | 0 | 100% | 3.3 | 19.5% | 13.6% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 3.63 | 3.18 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Guardians | 10 | 7 | 37 | 178 | 41 | 18 | 3 | 70% | 3.7 | 15.7% | 12.6% | 3.0% | 2.6% | 6.75 | 4.79 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | ROK RAW | ACL Guardians | 10 | 7 | 37 | 178 | 41 | 18 | 3 | 70% | 3.7 | 23.0% | 10.1% | 12.9% | 1.7% | 6.75 | 3.39 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 36 | 182 | 31 | 30 | 1 | 100% | 3.0 | 12.3% | 19.7% | -7.3% | 0.8% | 7.68 | 4.98 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 36 | 182 | 31 | 30 | 1 | 100% | 3.0 | 17.0% | 16.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 7.68 | 4.23 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | 25 | 0 | 38 | 190 | 36 | 38 | 3 | 0% | 1.5 | 14.0% | 23.6% | -9.6% | 2.4% | 6.63 | 6.24 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | 25 | 0 | 38 | 190 | 36 | 38 | 3 | 0% | 1.5 | 14.0% | 23.6% | -9.6% | 2.4% | 6.63 | 6.24 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A RAW | Lynchburg Hillcats | 25 | 0 | 38 | 190 | 36 | 38 | 3 | 0% | 1.5 | 18.9% | 20.0% | -1.1% | 1.6% | 6.63 | 5.23 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | CLE | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.5% | 14.9% | 6.6% | 3.0% | 5.20 | 5.20 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | CLE | 4 | 4 | 22 | 94 | 20 | 14 | 3 | 100% | 5.6 | 21.7% | 14.4% | 7.2% | 3.0% | 5.13 | 5.15 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | CLE | 1 | 1 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 100% | 8.0 | 21.7% | 14.4% | 7.2% | 3.0% | 5.13 | 5.15 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 100% | 8.1 | 21.7% | 14.4% | 7.2% | 3.0% | 5.13 | 4.77 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 173 | 123 | 25 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.7% | 14.4% | 7.2% | 3.0% | 5.13 | 4.77 | +1.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 59 | 31 | 151 | 719 | 99 | 132 | 11 | 53% | 2.6 | 13.8% | 18.3% | -4.5% | 1.5% | 6.13 | 5.07 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 78 | 41 | 200 | 950 | 131 | 174 | 14 | 53% | 2.6 | 13.8% | 18.3% | -4.5% | 1.5% | 6.13 | 5.07 | +0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 ALynchburg Hillcats · 38 IPFIP 4.90 → 6.24 (+1.34)K% 18.9% → 14.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.95% | — | ×0.740 | 14.02% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.00% | — | ×1.180 | 23.60% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.58% | ÷0.844 | ×1.300 | 2.43% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 4.90 → 6.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ALynchburg Hillcats · 32 IPFIP 4.14 → 4.98 (+0.84)K% 16.7% → 12.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.67% | — | ×0.740 | 12.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.67% | — | ×1.180 | 19.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.62% | ÷1.017 | ×1.300 | 0.79% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 4.14 → 4.98, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKACL Guardians · 4 IPFIP 3.31 → 4.33 (+1.02)K% 20.0% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.680 | 13.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.00% | — | ×1.250 | 18.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.349 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 170).
Result: FIP 3.31 → 4.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKACL Guardians · 37 IPFIP 3.36 → 4.79 (+1.43)K% 23.0% → 15.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.03% | — | ×0.680 | 15.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.11% | — | ×1.250 | 12.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.69% | ÷0.915 | ×1.400 | 2.58% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 3.36 → 4.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKDSL Indians Red · 40 IPFIP 3.17 → 4.13 (+0.96)K% 19.5% → 13.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.53% | — | ×0.680 | 13.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.61% | — | ×1.250 | 17.01% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.017 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 3.17 → 4.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).