C.J. Culpepper
P St. Paul Saints| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 16 | 15 | 58 | 3.55 | 2.50 | 26.8% | 7.5% | — | K 21.0% · BB 8.5% · FIP 3.30 |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX3 levels | 17 | 17 | 59 | 2.43 | 3.76 | 21.2% | 12.4% | — | K 15.8% · BB 14.3% · FIP 4.73 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 42 | 7 | 80 | 4.29 | 3.95 | 23.8% | 12.5% | — | K 20.1% · BB 11.8% · FIP 4.28 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBMIN | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4.88 | 4.88 | 19.7% | 12.1% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 26 | MLBMIN | 4 | 4 | 26 | 4.78 | 4.74 | 21.0% | 11.7% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ53% MLB | 27 | MLBMIN | 6 | 6 | 33 | 4.74 | 4.74 | 21.1% | 11.5% | 0.3 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Twins | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 3.94 | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Twins | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 4.10 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 86 | 358 | 89 | 31 | 4 | 100% | 4.1 | 18.7% | 10.1% | 8.6% | 1.4% | 3.56 | 3.55 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 86 | 358 | 89 | 31 | 4 | 100% | 4.1 | 24.9% | 8.7% | 16.2% | 1.1% | 3.56 | 2.72 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 15 | 58 | 239 | 64 | 18 | 3 | 94% | 3.6 | 21.0% | 8.5% | 12.5% | 1.6% | 3.55 | 3.30 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 15 | 58 | 239 | 64 | 18 | 3 | 94% | 3.6 | 21.0% | 8.5% | 12.5% | 1.6% | 3.55 | 3.30 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 16 | 15 | 58 | 239 | 64 | 18 | 3 | 94% | 3.6 | 26.8% | 7.5% | 19.2% | 1.3% | 3.55 | 2.50 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 17 | 17 | 59 | 250 | 53 | 31 | 4 | 100% | 3.5 | 15.8% | 14.3% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 2.43 | 4.73 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 17 | 17 | 59 | 250 | 53 | 31 | 4 | 100% | 3.5 | 15.8% | 14.3% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 2.43 | 4.73 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 17 | 17 | 59 | 250 | 53 | 31 | 4 | 100% | 3.5 | 21.2% | 12.4% | 8.8% | 1.6% | 2.43 | 3.76 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 7 | 80 | 353 | 84 | 44 | 8 | 17% | 1.9 | 20.1% | 11.8% | 8.3% | 2.5% | 4.29 | 4.28 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 7 | 80 | 353 | 84 | 44 | 8 | 17% | 1.9 | 20.1% | 11.8% | 8.3% | 2.5% | 4.29 | 4.28 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 42 | 7 | 80 | 353 | 84 | 44 | 8 | 17% | 1.9 | 23.8% | 12.5% | 11.3% | 2.3% | 4.29 | 3.95 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | MIN | 1 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 7.0 | 19.7% | 12.1% | 7.6% | 2.8% | 4.88 | 4.88 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | MIN | 12 | 12 | 70 | 296 | 62 | 35 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.0% | 11.7% | 9.3% | 2.8% | 4.77 | 4.73 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | MIN | 11 | 11 | 63 | 266 | 56 | 31 | 8 | 100% | 5.7 | 21.1% | 11.5% | 9.6% | 2.9% | 4.73 | 4.73 | +0.5 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIN | 11 | 11 | 65 | 273 | 63 | 29 | 8 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.0% | 10.7% | 12.3% | 3.0% | 4.60 | 4.52 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIN | 10 | 10 | 60 | 251 | 57 | 27 | 8 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.8% | 10.9% | 11.9% | 3.1% | 4.63 | 4.65 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIN | 9 | 9 | 53 | 225 | 51 | 25 | 8 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.4% | 11.2% | 11.3% | 3.3% | 4.75 | 4.83 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | MIN | 4 | 4 | 26 | 110 | 23 | 13 | 3 | 100% | 6.5 | 21.0% | 11.7% | 9.3% | 2.8% | 4.78 | 4.74 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | MIN | 6 | 6 | 33 | 139 | 29 | 16 | 4 | 100% | 5.5 | 21.1% | 11.5% | 9.6% | 2.9% | 4.74 | 4.74 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIN | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 41 | 19 | 5 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.0% | 10.7% | 12.3% | 3.0% | 4.61 | 4.53 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIN | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 40 | 19 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.8% | 10.9% | 11.9% | 3.1% | 4.64 | 4.66 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIN | 7 | 7 | 41 | 173 | 39 | 19 | 6 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.4% | 11.2% | 11.3% | 3.3% | 4.76 | 4.84 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 31 | 31 | 184 | 778 | 173 | 87 | 24 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.2% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 3.1% | 4.70 | 4.31 | +2.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 188 | 94 | 26 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.2% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 3.1% | 4.70 | 4.31 | +2.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 97 | 60 | 284 | 1205 | 228 | 135 | 23 | 62% | 2.9 | 19.0% | 11.2% | 7.8% | 1.9% | 3.51 | 3.96 | +2.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 68 | 42 | 200 | 848 | 161 | 95 | 16 | 62% | 2.9 | 19.0% | 11.2% | 7.8% | 1.9% | 3.51 | 3.96 | +1.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAASt. Paul Saints · 57 IPFIP 4.37 → 4.61 (+0.25)K% 22.6% → 19.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.57% | — | ×0.860 | 19.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.23% | — | ×0.900 | 11.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.72% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 3.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.37 → 4.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAWichita Wind Surge · 22 IPFIP 2.70 → 3.39 (+0.68)K% 27.1% → 21.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.08% | — | ×0.810 | 21.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.42% | — | ×1.100 | 11.46% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.04% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 1.25% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.70 → 3.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAWichita Wind Surge · 54 IPFIP 4.05 → 4.73 (+0.68)K% 19.5% → 15.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.48% | — | ×0.810 | 15.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.99% | — | ×1.100 | 14.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.73% | ÷0.986 | ×1.200 | 2.11% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 4.05 → 4.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 37 IPFIP 1.97 → 2.69 (+0.72)K% 28.9% → 22.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.86% | — | ×0.770 | 22.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.38% | — | ×1.150 | 8.49% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.67% | ÷1.191 | ×1.250 | 0.70% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 138).
Result: FIP 1.97 → 2.69, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAWichita Wind Surge · 21 IPFIP 3.33 → 4.32 (+0.99)K% 23.3% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.33% | — | ×0.810 | 18.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.78% | — | ×1.100 | 8.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.22% | ÷0.845 | ×1.200 | 3.16% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 3.33 → 4.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AFort Myers Mighty Mussels · 46 IPFIP 2.28 → 3.32 (+1.04)K% 29.4% → 21.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.44% | — | ×0.740 | 21.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.33% | — | ×1.180 | 9.83% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.11% | ÷0.976 | ×1.300 | 1.48% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 2.28 → 3.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 40 IPFIP 3.15 → 3.77 (+0.63)K% 20.2% → 15.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.22% | — | ×0.770 | 15.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.99% | — | ×1.150 | 10.34% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.12% | ÷1.134 | ×1.250 | 1.24% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 127).
Result: FIP 3.15 → 3.77, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.9 | 63 | 21.6% | 11.4% | 1.15 | 4.73 |
| Josias Manzanillo ('04) | 1.7 | 57 | 20.0% | 10.2% | 1.21 | 4.71 |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |
| Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*) | 1.0 | 50 | 21.5%* | 11.9%* | 1.05* | 4.68* |
| Bill Scherrer ('82-'88, 1 WAR*) | 1.6 | 62 | 20.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.19* | 4.44* |
| Valerio De Los Santos ('08) | 1.3 | 51 | 18.7% | 11.5% | 1.30 | 4.57 |
| Tyler Yates ('09) | 1.2 | 62 | 19.7% | 12.0% | 0.94 | 5.12 |