Coleman Crow
P Nashville Sounds| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 22 | AALAA | 4 | 4 | 24 | 1.88 | 2.89 | 36.0% | 7.0% | — | K 29.2% · BB 7.7% · FIP 3.97 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 12 | 12 | 50 | 3.24 | 2.04 | 32.0% | 6.0% | — | K 25.2% · BB 5.3% · FIP 2.31 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 23 | 124 | 3.85 | 3.52 | 21.5% | 7.7% | 2.8 | K 18.7% · BB 7.0% · FIP 3.76 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBMIL | 14 | 14 | 87 | 4.23 | 4.19 | 19.1% | 6.9% | 1.2 | |
| 2028PROJ77% MLB | 27 | MLBMIL | 16 | 16 | 97 | 4.30 | 4.30 | 19.3% | 7.0% | 1.3 | |
| 2029PROJ82% MLB | 28 | MLBMIL | 16 | 16 | 95 | 4.36 | 4.40 | 19.4% | 7.2% | 1.2 |
Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 20 | A MLE | Inland Empire 66ers | 13 | 10 | 62 | 287 | 62 | 29 | 7 | 77% | 4.8 | 16.0% | 11.9% | 4.1% | 3.1% | 4.19 | 4.96 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | A RAW | Inland Empire 66ers | 13 | 10 | 62 | 287 | 62 | 29 | 7 | 77% | 4.8 | 21.6% | 10.1% | 11.5% | 2.4% | 4.19 | 3.97 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | AA MLE | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 24 | 23 | 128 | 554 | 128 | 35 | 20 | 96% | 5.3 | 18.7% | 6.9% | 11.8% | 3.8% | 4.85 | 4.50 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | AA RAW | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 24 | 23 | 128 | 554 | 128 | 35 | 20 | 96% | 5.3 | 23.1% | 6.3% | 16.8% | 3.6% | 4.85 | 3.95 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | AA MLE | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 4 | 4 | 24 | 86 | 31 | 6 | 3 | 100% | 6.0 | 29.2% | 7.7% | 21.5% | 4.3% | 1.88 | 3.97 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | AA RAW | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 4 | 4 | 24 | 86 | 31 | 6 | 3 | 100% | 6.0 | 36.0% | 7.0% | 29.1% | 3.5% | 1.88 | 2.89 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 50 | 200 | 64 | 12 | 3 | 100% | 4.2 | 25.2% | 5.3% | 20.0% | 1.2% | 3.24 | 2.31 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 50 | 200 | 64 | 12 | 3 | 100% | 4.2 | 25.2% | 5.3% | 20.0% | 1.2% | 3.24 | 2.31 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 50 | 200 | 64 | 12 | 3 | 100% | 4.2 | 32.0% | 6.0% | 26.0% | 1.5% | 3.24 | 2.04 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 23 | 124 | 522 | 112 | 40 | 12 | 92% | 5.0 | 18.7% | 7.0% | 11.7% | 2.5% | 3.85 | 3.76 | +2.4 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 23 | 124 | 522 | 112 | 40 | 12 | 92% | 5.0 | 18.7% | 7.0% | 11.7% | 2.5% | 3.85 | 3.76 | +2.4 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 23 | 124 | 522 | 112 | 40 | 12 | 92% | 5.0 | 21.5% | 7.7% | 13.8% | 2.3% | 3.85 | 3.52 | +2.8 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 5 | 4 | 19 | 85 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 80% | 3.7 | 11.8% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 2.4% | 5.30 | 4.22 | +0.3 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | MIL | 14 | 14 | 87 | 367 | 70 | 25 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.1% | 6.9% | 12.2% | 2.6% | 4.23 | 4.19 | +1.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | MIL | 21 | 21 | 126 | 532 | 103 | 37 | 14 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.3% | 7.0% | 12.3% | 2.7% | 4.23 | 4.23 | +1.7 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIL | 19 | 19 | 116 | 490 | 95 | 35 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.4% | 7.2% | 12.2% | 2.8% | 4.28 | 4.32 | +1.5 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIL | 18 | 18 | 105 | 444 | 84 | 33 | 13 | 100% | 5.8 | 18.9% | 7.5% | 11.5% | 3.0% | 4.39 | 4.47 | +1.1 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIL | 16 | 16 | 94 | 398 | 73 | 31 | 13 | 100% | 5.9 | 18.3% | 7.8% | 10.6% | 3.2% | 4.56 | 4.67 | +0.8 |
| 2032 | 31 | MLB MLE | MIL | 14 | 14 | 83 | 351 | 62 | 28 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 17.6% | 8.1% | 9.5% | 3.4% | 4.77 | 4.91 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 32 | MLB MLE | MIL | 12 | 12 | 72 | 306 | 51 | 26 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 16.8% | 8.5% | 8.3% | 3.7% | 5.00 | 5.16 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | MIL | 16 | 16 | 97 | 410 | 79 | 29 | 12 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.3% | 7.0% | 12.3% | 2.9% | 4.30 | 4.30 | +1.3 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIL | 16 | 16 | 95 | 401 | 78 | 29 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.4% | 7.2% | 12.2% | 3.0% | 4.36 | 4.40 | +1.2 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIL | 15 | 15 | 89 | 376 | 71 | 28 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 18.9% | 7.5% | 11.5% | 3.2% | 4.47 | 4.55 | +1.0 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIL | 14 | 14 | 82 | 346 | 63 | 27 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 18.3% | 7.8% | 10.6% | 3.4% | 4.65 | 4.76 | +0.7 |
| 2032 | 31 | MLB CTX | MIL | 12 | 12 | 74 | 312 | 55 | 25 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 17.6% | 8.1% | 9.5% | 3.6% | 4.86 | 5.00 | +0.4 |
| 2033 | 32 | MLB CTX | MIL | 11 | 11 | 65 | 274 | 46 | 23 | 11 | 100% | 5.9 | 16.8% | 8.5% | 8.3% | 3.9% | 5.10 | 5.26 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 89 | 88 | 521 | 2207 | 403 | 166 | 71 | 99% | 5.9 | 18.3% | 7.5% | 10.7% | 3.2% | 4.61 | 4.28 | +6.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 847 | 155 | 64 | 27 | 99% | 5.9 | 18.3% | 7.5% | 10.7% | 3.2% | 4.61 | 4.28 | +2.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 78 | 72 | 388 | 1649 | 323 | 126 | 49 | 92% | 5.0 | 19.6% | 7.7% | 11.9% | 3.0% | 4.03 | 4.05 | +6.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 40 | 37 | 200 | 849 | 166 | 65 | 25 | 92% | 5.0 | 19.6% | 7.7% | 11.9% | 3.0% | 4.03 | 4.05 | +2.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAANashville Sounds · 105 IPFIP 3.40 → 3.70 (+0.30)K% 23.3% → 20.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.34% | — | ×0.860 | 20.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.01% | — | ×0.900 | 7.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.29% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 2.52% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.40 → 3.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AABiloxi Shuckers · 43 IPFIP 1.73 → 2.31 (+0.58)K% 31.1% → 25.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.14% | — | ×0.810 | 25.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.79% | — | ×1.100 | 5.27% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.20% | ÷1.170 | ×1.200 | 1.23% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 134).
Result: FIP 1.73 → 2.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAANashville Sounds · 7 IPFIP 3.23 → 3.49 (+0.26)K% 36.4% → 31.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.36% | — | ×0.860 | 31.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.12% | — | ×0.900 | 10.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.03% | ÷1.111 | ×1.100 | 3.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 122).
Result: FIP 3.23 → 3.49, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 24 IPFIP 2.85 → 3.97 (+1.12)K% 36.0% → 29.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.05% | — | ×0.810 | 29.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.98% | — | ×1.100 | 7.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.49% | ÷0.970 | ×1.200 | 4.31% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 2.85 → 3.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 128 IPFIP 3.93 → 4.50 (+0.57)K% 23.1% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.10% | — | ×0.810 | 18.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.32% | — | ×1.100 | 6.95% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.61% | ÷1.131 | ×1.200 | 3.83% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 126).
Result: FIP 3.93 → 4.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AInland Empire 66ers · 62 IPFIP 3.89 → 4.96 (+1.07)K% 21.6% → 16.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.60% | — | ×0.740 | 15.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.10% | — | ×1.180 | 11.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.44% | ÷1.023 | ×1.300 | 3.10% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 3.89 → 4.96, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.7 | 106 | 18.5% | 7.4% | 1.16 | 4.47 |
| Bob Sadowski ('63-'66, 2 WAR*) | 2.2 | 110 | 17.7%* | 8.0%* | 1.20* | 4.73* |
| Chris Narveson ('16) | 2.2 | 109 | 19.4% | 8.6% | 1.20 | 4.71 |
| Wally Whitehurst ('89-'96, 4 WAR*) | 2.4 | 98 | 19.0%* | 6.3%* | 1.11* | 4.50* |
| Alfredo Simon ('16) | 3.9 | 111 | 15.7% | 8.0% | 1.22 | 4.56 |
| Rod Nichols ('88-'95, 1 WAR*) | 2.1 | 103 | 16.1%* | 6.6%* | 1.21* | 4.64* |
| Chris Capuano ('16) | 7.1 | 119 | 19.5% | 7.5% | 1.23 | 4.38 |