Chris Narveson
P Columbus Clippers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 33 | MIX3 levels | 27 | 8 | 68 | 4.52 | 4.05 | 24.6% | 7.3% | 0.4 | K 23.6% · BB 8.0% · FIP 4.79 | |
| 2016 | 34 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 15 | 98 | 3.86 | 4.26 | 18.2% | 7.6% | 1.3 | K 16.2% · BB 8.5% · FIP 4.59 | |
| 2017 | 35 | AAACLE | 20 | 17 | 103 | 3.41 | 4.57 | 13.9% | 9.9% | — | K 12.2% · BB 10.4% · FIP 4.59 | |
| 2018 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2019 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2020 | 38 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 39 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 40 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 41 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 42 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 43 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 44 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2006 | 24 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 5 | 1 | 9 | 40 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 20% | 1.9 | 30.0% | 12.5% | 17.5% | 2.5% | 4.82 | 3.52 | +0.1 |
| 2006 | 24 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 5 | 1 | 9 | 40 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 20% | 1.9 | 30.0% | 12.5% | 17.5% | 2.5% | 4.82 | 3.53 | +0.1 |
| 2009 | 27 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 21 | 4 | 47 | 205 | 46 | 15 | 7 | 19% | 2.2 | 22.4% | 7.3% | 15.1% | 3.4% | 3.83 | 4.01 | +0.3 |
| 2009 | 27 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 21 | 4 | 47 | 205 | 46 | 15 | 7 | 19% | 2.2 | 22.4% | 7.3% | 15.1% | 3.4% | 3.83 | 4.04 | +0.3 |
| 2010 | 28 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 37 | 28 | 168 | 724 | 137 | 56 | 21 | 76% | 4.5 | 18.9% | 7.7% | 11.2% | 2.8% | 4.99 | 4.00 | +2.8 |
| 2010 | 28 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 37 | 28 | 168 | 724 | 137 | 56 | 21 | 76% | 4.5 | 18.9% | 7.7% | 11.2% | 2.9% | 4.99 | 4.10 | +2.6 |
| 2011 | 29 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 30 | 28 | 162 | 699 | 126 | 64 | 17 | 93% | 5.4 | 18.0% | 9.2% | 8.9% | 2.3% | 4.45 | 4.01 | +2.7 |
| 2011 | 29 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 30 | 28 | 162 | 699 | 126 | 64 | 17 | 93% | 5.4 | 18.0% | 9.2% | 8.9% | 2.4% | 4.45 | 4.10 | +2.5 |
| 2012 | 30 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 2 | 2 | 9 | 41 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 100% | 4.5 | 12.2% | 9.8% | 2.4% | 4.9% | 7.00 | 5.98 | -0.1 |
| 2012 | 30 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 2 | 2 | 9 | 41 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 100% | 4.5 | 12.2% | 9.8% | 2.4% | 4.9% | 7.00 | 6.21 | -0.1 |
| 2013 | 31 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 12.5% | -12.5% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 4.68 | -0.0 |
| 2013 | 31 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 12.5% | -12.5% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 4.60 | -0.0 |
| 2015 | 33 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 27 | 8 | 68 | 289 | 71 | 21 | 11 | 30% | 2.5 | 23.6% | 8.0% | 15.6% | 4.9% | 4.52 | 4.79 | -0.2 |
| 2015 | 33 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 27 | 8 | 68 | 289 | 71 | 21 | 11 | 30% | 2.5 | 24.6% | 7.3% | 17.3% | 3.8% | 4.52 | 4.05 | +0.4 |
| 2016 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 15 | 98 | 407 | 74 | 31 | 13 | 58% | 3.8 | 16.2% | 8.5% | 7.7% | 3.2% | 3.86 | 4.59 | +0.9 |
| 2016 | 34 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 15 | 98 | 407 | 74 | 31 | 13 | 58% | 3.8 | 18.2% | 7.6% | 10.6% | 3.2% | 3.86 | 4.26 | +1.3 |
| 2017 | 35 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 20 | 17 | 103 | 446 | 62 | 44 | 11 | 85% | 5.2 | 12.2% | 10.4% | 1.9% | 2.2% | 3.41 | 4.59 | — |
| 2017 | 35 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | 20 | 17 | 103 | 446 | 62 | 44 | 11 | 85% | 5.2 | 13.9% | 9.9% | 4.0% | 2.5% | 3.41 | 4.57 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 118 | 65 | 435 | 1876 | 364 | 155 | 58 | 55% | 3.7 | 19.4% | 8.3% | 11.1% | 3.1% | 4.71 | 4.23 | +6.0 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 118 | 65 | 435 | 1876 | 364 | 155 | 58 | 55% | 3.7 | 19.4% | 8.3% | 11.1% | 3.1% | 4.71 | 4.21 | +6.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 54 | 30 | 200 | 862 | 167 | 71 | 27 | 55% | 3.7 | 19.4% | 8.3% | 11.1% | 3.1% | 4.71 | 4.21 | +2.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 170 | 103 | 665 | 2859 | 515 | 249 | 83 | 61% | 3.9 | 18.0% | 8.7% | 9.3% | 2.9% | 4.33 | 4.28 | +6.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 51 | 31 | 200 | 859 | 155 | 75 | 25 | 61% | 3.9 | 18.0% | 8.7% | 9.3% | 2.9% | 4.33 | 4.28 | +2.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 AAAColumbus Clippers · 103 IPFIP 4.53 → 4.59 (+0.06)K% 13.9% → 12.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.90% | — | ×0.880 | 12.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.87% | — | ×1.050 | 10.36% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.47% | ÷1.231 | ×1.100 | 2.20% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 146).
Result: FIP 4.53 → 4.59, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAANew Orleans Zephyrs · 90 IPFIP 4.06 → 4.59 (+0.53)K% 18.4% → 16.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.43% | — | ×0.880 | 16.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.13% | — | ×1.050 | 8.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.71% | ÷0.919 | ×1.100 | 3.24% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 4.06 → 4.59, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAANew Orleans Zephyrs · 26 IPFIP 3.92 → 4.44 (+0.52)K% 23.6% → 20.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.58% | — | ×0.880 | 20.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.13% | — | ×1.050 | 8.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.25% | ÷0.975 | ×1.100 | 3.67% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 3.92 → 4.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 11 IPFIP 1.79 → 2.30 (+0.52)K% 22.2% → 17.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.22% | — | ×0.770 | 17.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.44% | — | ×1.150 | 5.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.819 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 64).
Result: FIP 1.79 → 2.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).