Ryan Ramsey

P Omaha Storm Chasers

Age 26 LHP 6'0" / 195 lbs AAA peak 0.3 · 2028

Overview

AAAPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%10%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2024	23	A+KC	22	11	89	2.43	2.52	27.4%	8.5%	—	K 21.1% · BB 9.7% · FIP 3.36
2025	24	MIX2 levels	27	20	114	5.70	3.94	22.2%	10.9%	—	K 18.5% · BB 11.4% · FIP 4.41
2026	25	AAAKC	28	21	116	6.07	5.02	20.8%	12.3%	—	K 17.9% · BB 11.1% · FIP 5.16
2027PROJ	26	MLBKC	1	1	8	5.30	5.30	17.7%	11.7%	0.0
2028PROJ43% MLB	27	MLBKC	6	6	36	5.21	5.23	18.1%	11.3%	0.1
2029PROJ63% MLB	28	MLBKC	8	8	47	5.20	5.24	18.3%	11.2%	0.1

Next 3 projected WAR 0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Scouting grades · 20-80

Stuff45Control45Command45

Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 -0.5 / P90 1.1, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 93%

CompsJustin Marks (age 27) · Luis Leroy Cruz (age 24) · Jack Snodgrass (age 27)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 118126vR 134

ERA5.30

FIP5.30

K%17.7%

BB%11.7%

K-BB%6.0%

Proj IP77

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 77 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

STUF4545

CTRL4545

CMD4545

K†4045

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2022	21	ROK MLE	ACL Royals	1	0	2	8	3	1	0	0%	2.0	37.5%	12.5%	25.0%	0.0%	0.00	1.52	—
2022	21	ROK RAW	ACL Royals	1	0	2	8	3	1	0	0%	2.0	37.5%	12.5%	25.0%	0.0%	0.00	1.60	—
2023	22	MIX MLE	3 levels	14	10	52	226	69	23	0	71%	3.7	21.7%	11.2%	10.5%	0.0%	3.83	2.69	—
2023	22	MIX RAW	3 levels	14	10	52	226	69	23	0	71%	3.7	30.5%	10.2%	20.4%	0.0%	3.83	1.76	—
2024	23	A+ MLE	Quad Cities River Bandits	22	11	89	354	97	30	4	50%	4.0	21.1%	9.7%	11.4%	1.5%	2.43	3.36	—
2024	23	A+ MLE	Quad Cities River Bandits	22	11	89	354	97	30	4	50%	4.0	21.1%	9.7%	11.4%	1.5%	2.43	3.36	—
2024	23	A+ RAW	Quad Cities River Bandits	22	11	89	354	97	30	4	50%	4.0	27.4%	8.5%	18.9%	1.1%	2.43	2.52	—
2025	24	MIX MLE	2 levels	27	20	114	514	114	56	12	74%	4.2	18.5%	11.4%	7.1%	2.6%	5.70	4.41	—
2025	24	MIX MLE	2 levels	27	20	114	514	114	56	12	74%	4.2	18.5%	11.4%	7.1%	2.6%	5.70	4.41	—
2025	24	MIX RAW	2 levels	27	20	114	514	114	56	12	74%	4.2	22.2%	10.9%	11.3%	2.3%	5.70	3.94	—
2026	25	AAA MLE	Omaha Storm Chasers	28	21	116	528	110	65	19	75%	4.1	17.9%	11.1%	6.8%	4.0%	6.07	5.16	—
2026	25	AAA MLE	Omaha Storm Chasers	28	21	116	528	110	65	19	75%	4.1	17.9%	11.1%	6.8%	4.0%	6.07	5.16	—
2026	25	AAA RAW	Omaha Storm Chasers	28	21	116	528	110	65	19	75%	4.1	20.8%	12.3%	8.5%	3.6%	6.07	5.02	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	26	MLB	KC	1	1	8	34	6	4	1	100%	8.0	17.7%	11.7%	6.0%	3.3%	5.30	5.30	+0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	27	MLB MLE	KC	14	14	84	354	64	40	12	100%	6.0	18.1%	11.3%	6.8%	3.4%	5.21	5.23	+0.2
2029	28	MLB MLE	KC	13	13	76	319	58	36	11	100%	5.8	18.3%	11.2%	7.0%	3.4%	5.20	5.24	+0.1
2030	29	MLB MLE	KC	11	11	68	289	53	33	10	100%	6.2	18.2%	11.3%	6.9%	3.6%	5.25	5.32	+0.1
2031	30	MLB MLE	KC	10	10	62	260	47	30	10	100%	6.2	17.9%	11.5%	6.5%	3.7%	5.37	5.47	-0.0
2028	27	MLB CTX	KC	6	6	36	152	27	17	5	100%	6.0	18.1%	11.3%	6.8%	3.4%	5.21	5.23	+0.1
2029	28	MLB CTX	KC	8	8	47	198	36	22	7	100%	5.9	18.3%	11.2%	7.0%	3.4%	5.20	5.24	+0.1
2030	29	MLB CTX	KC	8	8	50	211	38	24	8	100%	6.2	18.2%	11.3%	6.9%	3.6%	5.25	5.32	+0.0
2031	30	MLB CTX	KC	8	8	49	207	37	24	8	100%	6.1	17.9%	11.5%	6.5%	3.7%	5.37	5.47	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		30	30	182	768	139	87	27	100%	6.1	18.1%	11.3%	6.8%	3.5%	5.26	4.94	+0.9
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		33	33	200	844	153	96	30	100%	6.0	18.1%	11.3%	6.8%	3.5%	5.26	4.94	+1.0
Career	—	MLE		92	62	372	1630	317	178	39	67%	4.0	19.4%	10.9%	8.5%	2.4%	4.74	4.17	+0.3
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		49	33	200	876	170	96	21	67%	4.0	19.4%	10.9%	8.5%	2.4%	4.74	4.17	+0.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 116 IPFIP 4.88 → 5.16 (+0.29)K% 20.8% → 17.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	20.83%	—	×0.860	17.92%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	12.31%	—	×0.900	11.08%
HR / BF /BF	3.60%	÷1.000	×1.100	3.96%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 4.88 → 5.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals · 106 IPFIP 3.76 → 4.41 (+0.65)K% 22.9% → 18.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	22.88%	—	×0.810	18.53%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	10.38%	—	×1.100	11.42%
HR / BF /BF	2.33%	÷1.077	×1.200	2.60%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 115).

Result: FIP 3.76 → 4.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 8 IPFIP 5.31 → 5.40 (+0.08)K% 14.3% → 12.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	14.29%	—	×0.860	12.29%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	16.67%	—	×0.900	15.00%
HR / BF /BF	2.38%	÷1.003	×1.100	2.61%

Result: FIP 5.31 → 5.40, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 A+Quad Cities River Bandits · 89 IPFIP 2.48 → 3.36 (+0.88)K% 27.4% → 21.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	27.40%	—	×0.770	21.10%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	8.47%	—	×1.150	9.75%
HR / BF /BF	1.13%	÷0.959	×1.250	1.47%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).

Result: FIP 2.48 → 3.36, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AColumbia Fireflies · 33 IPFIP 1.59 → 2.42 (+0.82)K% 29.5% → 21.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	29.46%	—	×0.740	21.80%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	7.75%	—	×1.180	9.15%
HR / BF /BF	0.00%	÷1.089	×1.300	0.00%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).

Result: FIP 1.59 → 2.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 A+Quad Cities River Bandits · 14 IPFIP 2.35 → 3.13 (+0.78)K% 27.8% → 21.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	27.85%	—	×0.770	21.44%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	12.66%	—	×1.150	14.56%
HR / BF /BF	0.00%	÷1.033	×1.250	0.00%

Result: FIP 2.35 → 3.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Ryan Ramsey (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.30	17.7%	11.7%	3.3%	—	5.26	18.2%	6.9%	228	-0.04	—	—	—
Justin Marks L 2015 · 4.60 FIP	27	SP-	4.60	15.4%	10.5%	2.7%	.323	3.88	19.0%	9.1%	216	-0.72	3.83	324	86
Luis Leroy Cruz L 2015 · 5.03 FIP	24	SP-	5.03	16.0%	10.1%	3.7%	.289	—	—	—	—	—	5.03	116	83
Jack Snodgrass L 2015 · 4.66 FIP	27	SP-	4.66	12.6%	10.7%	2.3%	.278	5.01	15.7%	5.6%	45	+0.35	4.66	118	82
Miguel Cienfuegos L 2023 · 5.12 FIP	26	SP	5.12	13.6%	10.5%	3.4%	.257	4.54	14.3%	5.8%	242	-0.58	2.95	313	81
Houston Harding L 2024 · 4.54 FIP	26	SP-	4.54	16.5%	11.2%	2.6%	.268	5.19	12.0%	0.5%	61	+0.65	3.41	239	81
Bryan Radziewski L 2015 · 4.15 FIP	23	SP-	4.15	16.4%	10.5%	2.0%	.280	—	—	—	—	—	4.15	106	79
Danny Wirchansky L 2024 · 4.47 FIP	27	SP-	4.47	16.2%	7.4%	3.3%	.246	5.88	13.0%	0.2%	68	+1.41	4.47	179	79
Scott DeCecco L 2015 · 4.55 FIP	24	SP-	4.55	14.5%	11.5%	2.2%	.331	—	—	—	—	—	4.55	125	78
Hayden Mullins L 2024 · 4.39 FIP	23	SP-	4.39	23.4%	12.4%	3.1%	.288	3.69	25.5%	11.8%	194	-0.70	3.54	283	78
Brad Mills L 2011 · 5.37 FIP	26	SP-	5.37	19.8%	12.1%	4.4%	.328	5.61	18.8%	7.9%	21	+0.24	4.22	243	76
Brian Burres L 2007 · 4.50 FIP	26	SW	4.50	17.2%	11.6%	2.5%	.328	4.71	11.3%	3.1%	209	+0.21	4.50	344	75
Hayden Wynja L 2024 · 4.79 FIP	25	SP-	4.79	18.0%	10.5%	3.4%	.274	—	—	—	—	—	4.74	154	75
Erik Rivera L 2024 · 5.71 FIP	23	SP-	5.71	19.0%	14.6%	4.3%	.255	4.74	23.9%	6.3%	106	-0.97	4.42	141	75
Nate Peterson L 2024 · 5.51 FIP	24	SP-	5.51	19.2%	11.4%	4.7%	.296	4.75	16.0%	3.7%	148	-0.76	4.27	315	74
Matt Walker L 2023 · 4.73 FIP	25	SP-	4.73	12.7%	10.0%	2.6%	.333	—	—	—	—	—	4.21	156	74
Tyler Alexander L 2019 · 5.56 FIP	27	SP-	5.56	21.7%	9.8%	5.6%	.289	5.27	15.7%	5.0%	26	-0.29	5.27	128	73
Grant Watson L 2017 · 4.70 FIP	24	SP-	4.70	16.4%	10.3%	3.0%	.344	—	—	—	—	—	2.59	180	72
Mason Green L 2024 · 4.80 FIP	25	SP-	4.80	18.7%	12.6%	3.1%	.307	3.85	18.2%	6.4%	157	-0.95	3.68	450	72
Avery Weems L 2022 · 4.87 FIP	25	SP-	4.87	21.3%	8.6%	4.5%	.323	5.13	20.5%	12.3%	38	+0.26	2.46	227	72
Jeffry Antigua L 2015 · 4.60 FIP	25	SP-	4.60	11.4%	8.6%	2.5%	.271	—	—	—	—	—	4.60	133	72

Career Comps

Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.

Player	162s	IP/yr	K%	BB%	HR/9	ERA
OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION	1.8	73	18.0%	11.4%	1.34	5.26
Scott Proctor ('11)	1.7	57	19.0%	10.9%	1.52	4.78
Justin Miller ('10)	1.9	63	18.1%	11.3%	1.17	4.82
Paul Spoljaric ('00)	1.4	69	22.1%	12.9%	1.33	5.52
Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*)	1.3	52	20.3%*	11.5%*	1.13*	4.84*
Daryl Patterson ('68-'74, -1 WAR*)	1.2	46	18.3%*	11.2%*	1.27*	5.03*
Phil Hennigan ('69-'73, -0 WAR*)	1.4	70	20.9%*	10.4%*	1.50*	4.95*