Alejandro Melean
P New Hampshire Fisher Cats| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 17 | 13 | 62 | 3.34 | 3.87 | 23.1% | 9.8% | — | K 18.2% · BB 10.9% · FIP 4.77 | |
| 2023 | 22 | AATOR | 25 | 6 | 63 | 4.41 | 4.38 | 22.1% | 12.1% | — | K 17.9% · BB 13.3% · FIP 5.10 | |
| 2024 | 23 | AATOR | 8 | 0 | 18 | 7.50 | 5.66 | 12.8% | 11.5% | — | K 10.4% · BB 12.7% · FIP 6.04 | |
| 2025 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBTOR | — | — | 0 | 4.63 | 4.63 | 20.9% | 10.0% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 27 | MLBTOR | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.62 | 4.64 | 21.2% | 10.0% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 17 | ROK MLE | GCL Blue Jays | 9 | 7 | 33 | 156 | 31 | 22 | 5 | 78% | 3.6 | 13.5% | 17.6% | -4.1% | 4.5% | 4.68 | 6.65 | — |
| 2018 | 17 | ROK RAW | GCL Blue Jays | 9 | 7 | 33 | 156 | 31 | 22 | 5 | 78% | 3.6 | 19.9% | 14.1% | 5.8% | 3.2% | 4.68 | 5.21 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 14 | 82 | 382 | 92 | 36 | 12 | 61% | 3.6 | 18.0% | 11.1% | 6.9% | 4.1% | 5.16 | 5.23 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 14 | 82 | 382 | 92 | 36 | 12 | 61% | 3.6 | 24.1% | 9.4% | 14.7% | 3.1% | 5.16 | 4.08 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 17 | 13 | 62 | 255 | 59 | 25 | 7 | 76% | 3.6 | 18.2% | 10.9% | 7.3% | 3.3% | 3.34 | 4.77 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 17 | 13 | 62 | 255 | 59 | 25 | 7 | 76% | 3.6 | 23.1% | 9.8% | 13.3% | 2.7% | 3.34 | 3.87 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | AA MLE | New Hampshire Fisher Cats | 25 | 6 | 63 | 289 | 64 | 35 | 8 | 24% | 2.5 | 17.9% | 13.3% | 4.6% | 3.3% | 4.41 | 5.10 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | AA RAW | New Hampshire Fisher Cats | 25 | 6 | 63 | 289 | 64 | 35 | 8 | 24% | 2.5 | 22.1% | 12.1% | 10.0% | 2.8% | 4.41 | 4.38 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | AA MLE | New Hampshire Fisher Cats | 8 | 0 | 18 | 78 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 0% | 2.2 | 10.4% | 12.7% | -2.3% | 4.0% | 7.50 | 6.04 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | AA MLE | New Hampshire Fisher Cats | 8 | 0 | 18 | 78 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 0% | 2.2 | 10.4% | 12.7% | -2.3% | 4.0% | 7.50 | 6.04 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | AA RAW | New Hampshire Fisher Cats | 8 | 0 | 18 | 78 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 0% | 2.2 | 12.8% | 11.5% | 1.3% | 3.8% | 7.50 | 5.66 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | TOR | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.9% | 10.0% | 11.0% | 3.0% | 4.63 | 4.63 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | TOR | 16 | 0 | 17 | 72 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.2% | 10.0% | 11.2% | 3.1% | 4.62 | 4.64 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | TOR | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.2% | 10.0% | 11.2% | 3.1% | 4.62 | 4.64 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 27 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.2% | 10.0% | 11.2% | 3.1% | 4.62 | 4.26 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 188 | 94 | 31 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.2% | 10.0% | 11.2% | 3.1% | 4.62 | 4.26 | +0.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 82 | 40 | 258 | 1160 | 196 | 146 | 44 | 49% | 3.1 | 16.9% | 12.6% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 4.64 | 5.34 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 64 | 31 | 200 | 899 | 152 | 113 | 34 | 49% | 3.1 | 16.9% | 12.6% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 4.64 | 5.34 | -0.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 18 IPFIP 5.59 → 6.04 (+0.45)K% 12.8% → 10.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.82% | — | ×0.810 | 10.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.54% | — | ×1.100 | 12.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.85% | ÷1.145 | ×1.200 | 4.03% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 129).
Result: FIP 5.59 → 6.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 63 IPFIP 4.28 → 5.10 (+0.81)K% 22.1% → 17.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.15% | — | ×0.810 | 17.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.11% | — | ×1.100 | 13.32% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.77% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 3.32% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.28 → 5.10, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 30 IPFIP 5.31 → 6.13 (+0.82)K% 18.5% → 15.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.46% | — | ×0.810 | 14.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.08% | — | ×1.100 | 14.38% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.85% | ÷1.027 | ×1.200 | 4.50% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 5.31 → 6.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Vancouver Canadians · 32 IPFIP 2.42 → 3.37 (+0.94)K% 28.0% → 21.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.00% | — | ×0.770 | 21.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.40% | — | ×1.150 | 7.36% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.60% | ÷0.952 | ×1.250 | 2.10% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 2.42 → 3.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ADunedin Blue Jays · 63 IPFIP 4.11 → 5.44 (+1.33)K% 25.6% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.60% | — | ×0.740 | 18.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.24% | — | ×1.180 | 12.08% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.41% | ÷1.010 | ×1.300 | 4.39% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).
Result: FIP 4.11 → 5.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Vancouver Canadians · 19 IPFIP 3.57 → 4.54 (+0.96)K% 19.1% → 14.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.10% | — | ×0.770 | 14.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.74% | — | ×1.150 | 7.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.25% | ÷0.909 | ×1.250 | 3.09% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.57 → 4.54, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKGCL Blue Jays · 33 IPFIP 4.97 → 6.65 (+1.69)K% 19.9% → 13.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.87% | — | ×0.680 | 13.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.10% | — | ×1.250 | 17.63% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.21% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 4.49% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.97 → 6.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).