Derek Clark
P Rancho Cucamonga Quakes| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | ASEA | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 34.5% | 0.0% | — | K 34.5% · BB 0.0% · FIP 0.19 |
| 2026 | 24 | ALAA | 23 | 21 | 123 | 4.76 | 3.81 | 25.3% | 4.7% | — | K 18.7% · BB 5.6% · FIP 5.16 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBLAA | — | — | 0 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 19.6% | 5.9% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 26 | MLBLAA | 7 | 7 | 41 | 4.49 | 4.48 | 20.3% | 6.0% | 0.5 | |
| 2029PROJ63% MLB | 27 | MLBLAA | 9 | 9 | 56 | 4.49 | 4.50 | 20.4% | 6.2% | 0.6 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Inland Empire 66ers | 4 | 4 | 8 | 29 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2.0 | 34.5% | 0.0% | 34.5% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.19 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Inland Empire 66ers | 4 | 4 | 8 | 29 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2.0 | 34.5% | 0.0% | 34.5% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.19 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A RAW | Inland Empire 66ers | 4 | 4 | 8 | 29 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2.0 | 34.5% | 0.0% | 34.5% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.60 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | 23 | 21 | 123 | 510 | 129 | 24 | 21 | 91% | 5.3 | 18.7% | 5.6% | 13.2% | 5.4% | 4.76 | 5.16 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | 23 | 21 | 123 | 510 | 129 | 24 | 21 | 91% | 5.3 | 18.7% | 5.6% | 13.2% | 5.4% | 4.76 | 5.16 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | 23 | 21 | 123 | 510 | 129 | 24 | 21 | 91% | 5.3 | 25.3% | 4.7% | 20.6% | 4.1% | 4.76 | 3.81 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | LAA | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.6% | 5.9% | 13.8% | 3.5% | 4.50 | 4.50 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | LAA | 16 | 16 | 96 | 407 | 83 | 24 | 14 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.3% | 6.0% | 14.3% | 3.5% | 4.45 | 4.44 | +1.1 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | LAA | 15 | 15 | 90 | 380 | 78 | 24 | 13 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.4% | 6.2% | 14.2% | 3.5% | 4.45 | 4.46 | +1.0 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | LAA | 14 | 14 | 85 | 358 | 73 | 23 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.3% | 6.4% | 13.9% | 3.6% | 4.50 | 4.53 | +0.9 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | LAA | 13 | 13 | 79 | 332 | 67 | 22 | 12 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.2% | 6.7% | 13.5% | 3.7% | 4.59 | 4.66 | +0.7 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB MLE | LAA | 12 | 12 | 71 | 301 | 60 | 21 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.8% | 7.0% | 12.8% | 3.9% | 4.74 | 4.84 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 31 | MLB MLE | LAA | 11 | 11 | 63 | 267 | 52 | 20 | 11 | 100% | 5.7 | 19.4% | 7.3% | 12.1% | 4.1% | 4.92 | 5.04 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | LAA | 7 | 7 | 41 | 173 | 35 | 10 | 6 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.3% | 6.0% | 14.3% | 3.5% | 4.49 | 4.48 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | LAA | 9 | 9 | 56 | 236 | 48 | 15 | 8 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.4% | 6.2% | 14.2% | 3.6% | 4.49 | 4.50 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | LAA | 11 | 11 | 64 | 270 | 55 | 17 | 10 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.3% | 6.4% | 13.9% | 3.6% | 4.54 | 4.57 | +0.6 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | LAA | 11 | 11 | 64 | 270 | 54 | 18 | 10 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.2% | 6.7% | 13.5% | 3.8% | 4.63 | 4.70 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 61 | 258 | 51 | 18 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.8% | 7.0% | 12.8% | 4.0% | 4.78 | 4.88 | +0.4 |
| 2033 | 31 | MLB CTX | LAA | 9 | 9 | 56 | 236 | 46 | 17 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.4% | 7.3% | 12.1% | 4.2% | 4.97 | 5.09 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 57 | 57 | 342 | 1445 | 290 | 96 | 55 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.1% | 6.6% | 13.4% | 3.8% | 4.65 | 4.33 | +4.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 169 | 56 | 32 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.1% | 6.6% | 13.4% | 3.8% | 4.65 | 4.33 | +2.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 27 | 25 | 131 | 539 | 105 | 28 | 27 | 93% | 4.9 | 19.6% | 5.3% | 14.3% | 5.1% | 4.47 | 4.89 | +4.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 41 | 38 | 200 | 823 | 161 | 43 | 42 | 93% | 4.9 | 19.6% | 5.3% | 14.3% | 5.1% | 4.47 | 4.89 | +1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 123 IPFIP 3.82 → 5.16 (+1.34)K% 25.3% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.29% | — | ×0.740 | 18.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.71% | — | ×1.180 | 5.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.12% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 5.35% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.82 → 5.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AInland Empire 66ers · 8 IPFIP 0.19 → 0.95 (+0.76)K% 34.5% → 25.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.48% | — | ×0.740 | 25.52% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.180 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.882 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 0.19 → 0.95, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.9 | 81 | 20.0% | 6.4% | 1.42 | 4.57 |
| Matt Andriese ('24) | 2.6 | 74 | 21.8% | 6.7% | 1.36 | 4.65 |
| Vidal Nuño ('18) | 1.9 | 75 | 19.6% | 6.6% | 1.55 | 4.06 |
| Rich Bordi ('80-'88, 1 WAR*) | 1.9 | 74 | 20.8%* | 7.3%* | 1.22* | 4.55* |
| Adam Morgan ('21) | 1.8 | 62 | 20.8% | 7.2% | 1.58 | 4.80 |
| Ron Taylor ('62-'72, 3 WAR*) | 4.0 | 80 | 17.8%* | 6.8%* | 1.26* | 4.74* |
| Tom Walker ('72-'77, 1 WAR*) | 2.1 | 83 | 20.9%* | 7.5%* | 1.28* | 4.32* |