Kade Snell
RF South Bend Cubs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23 | A+CHC | 112 | .167/.273/.219 | 0 | 11 | 19 | — | .160/.236/.210 |
| 2026 | 24 | A+/INTL2 orgs | 418 | .266/.367/.411 | 9 | 23 | 86 | — | .230/.300/.352 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 25 | MLBCHC | 1 | .217/.285/.333 | 0 | 0 | 74 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ22% MLB | 26 | MLBCHC | 45 | .219/.287/.338 | 1 | 1 | 76 | -0.1 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | A+ | South Bend Cubs | — | 112 | 96 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 19 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 167 | 273 | 219 | 491 | 52 | 203 | 17 | 12 | 233 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ | South Bend Cubs | — | 359 | 305 | 82 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 35 | 74 | 8 | 19 | 2 | 269 | 357 | 426 | 783 | 157 | 316 | 21 | 10 | 342 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | INTL | Mesa Solar Sox | — | 59 | 45 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 244 | 424 | 311 | 735 | 67 | 282 | 10 | 20 | 354 | 126 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 112 | 100 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 23 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 160 | 236 | 210 | 446 | 50 | 186 | 21 | 9 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 359 | 318 | 73 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 24 | 94 | 8 | 19 | 2 | 230 | 300 | 352 | 652 | 123 | 281 | 26 | 7 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 112 | 100 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 23 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 160 | 236 | 210 | 446 | 50 | 203 | 21 | 9 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ RAW | South Bend Cubs | — | 112 | 96 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 19 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 167 | 273 | 219 | 491 | 52 | 203 | 17 | 12 | 233 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 418 | 371 | 85 | 14 | 3 | 8 | 28 | 110 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 229 | 301 | 348 | 648 | 119 | 294 | 26 | 7 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 418 | 350 | 93 | 16 | 4 | 9 | 47 | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 266 | 367 | 411 | 778 | 146 | 311 | 19 | 11 | 344 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 112 | 101 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 23 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 158 | 236 | 208 | 444 | 50 | 186 | 21 | 9 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 418 | 377 | 85 | 14 | 3 | 8 | 28 | 110 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 225 | 301 | 342 | 643 | 117 | 281 | 26 | 7 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 112 | 101 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 23 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 158 | 236 | 208 | 444 | 50 | 186 | 21 | 9 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 418 | 377 | 85 | 14 | 3 | 8 | 28 | 110 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 225 | 301 | 342 | 643 | 117 | 281 | 26 | 7 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB MLE | CHC | 0% | 380 | 344 | 74 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 28 | 102 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 215 | 283 | 330 | 613 | 115 | 281 | 27 | 7 | 277 | 74 | -12 | +1 | -0 | -4 | +8 | -0.1 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB CTX | CHC | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 217 | 285 | 333 | 618 | 116 | 285 | 0 | 0 | 279 | 74 | -0 | +0 | -0 | -0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | CHC | 22% | 205 | 185 | 40 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 55 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 217 | 286 | 336 | 621 | 119 | 282 | 27 | 7 | 280 | 76 | -6 | +1 | -0 | -2 | +4 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | CHC | 22% | 45 | 41 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 219 | 287 | 338 | 625 | 120 | 285 | 27 | 7 | 282 | 76 | -1 | +0 | -0 | -0 | +1 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 45 | 41 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 220 | 289 | 341 | 630 | 122 | 286 | 27 | 7 | 282 | 70 | -1 | +0 | -0 | -0 | +1 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 592 | 130 | 29 | 0 | 14 | 43 | 173 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 220 | 288 | 340 | 627 | 120 | 286 | 27 | 7 | 282 | 70 | -19 | +3 | -1 | -7 | +14 | -1.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 916 | 820 | 176 | 32 | 6 | 15 | 66 | 237 | 15 | 43 | 6 | 215 | 285 | 323 | 608 | 109 | 277 | 26 | 7 | 272 | 70 | -12 | +1 | -0 | -4 | +8 | -0.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 582 | 125 | 23 | 4 | 11 | 47 | 168 | 11 | 31 | 4 | 215 | 286 | 325 | 611 | 110 | 277 | 26 | 7 | 272 | 70 | -20 | +2 | -1 | -7 | +14 | -1.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+South Bend Cubs · 359 PAwOBA .342 → .287 (−55)K% 20.6% → 26.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.61% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 26.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.75% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 6.84% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.23% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 1.74% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.81% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.013 | ×0.988 | 21.91% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.013 | ×0.988 | 5.26% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.30% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.013 | ×0.988 | 1.10% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.90% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 3.08% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.013.
Result: wOBA .342 → .287; ISO .157 → .128; BABIP .316 → .281. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+South Bend Cubs · 112 PAwOBA .232 → .196 (−36)K% 17.0% → 20.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.96% | ÷1.051 | ×1.270 | — | — | 20.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.50% | ÷1.042 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 8.50% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.58% | ÷1.021 | ×0.920 | ×1.037 | ×0.998 | 14.53% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.90% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.037 | ×0.998 | 3.27% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.30% | ÷0.900 | ×0.850 | ×1.037 | ×0.998 | 1.27% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.106 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 121, 1B 104, 2B 100, 3B 80, K 110, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.037.
Result: wOBA .232 → .196; ISO .052 → .048; BABIP .203 → .186. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .