Ediel Rivera
C Tampa Tarpons| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19 | A/ROKNYY | 251 | .212/.339/.308 | 2 | 18 | 19 | — | .135/.250/.190 |
| 2026 | 20 | ANYY | 233 | .197/.312/.283 | 4 | 6 | 30 | — | .156/.251/.220 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBNYY | 343 | .174/.245/.251 | 4 | 6 | 42 | -0.3 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 22 | MLBNYY | 63 | .181/.253/.273 | 1 | 1 | 49 | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ48% MLB | 23 | MLBNYY | 132 | .187/.259/.288 | 2 | 3 | 54 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 30 / POW 30
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | A | Tampa Tarpons | — | 66 | 55 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 164 | 303 | 200 | 503 | 36 | 257 | 30 | 8 | 255 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK | FCL Yankees | — | 185 | 153 | 35 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 49 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 229 | 352 | 346 | 698 | 118 | 314 | 26 | 9 | 320 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Tampa Tarpons | — | 233 | 198 | 39 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 71 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 197 | 312 | 283 | 595 | 86 | 280 | 30 | 9 | 280 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Tampa Tarpons | — | 66 | 56 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 107 | 242 | 125 | 367 | 18 | 216 | 41 | 6 | 186 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Yankees | — | 185 | 159 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 70 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 145 | 253 | 214 | 467 | 69 | 223 | 38 | 6 | 201 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Tampa Tarpons | — | 233 | 205 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 96 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 156 | 251 | 220 | 471 | 63 | 254 | 41 | 6 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 251 | 216 | 30 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 98 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 139 | 250 | 199 | 449 | 60 | 242 | 39 | 6 | 197 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 251 | 208 | 44 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 69 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 212 | 339 | 308 | 646 | 96 | 300 | 27 | 9 | 303 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Tampa Tarpons | — | 233 | 205 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 96 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 156 | 251 | 220 | 471 | 63 | 269 | 41 | 6 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | Tampa Tarpons | — | 233 | 198 | 39 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 71 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 197 | 312 | 283 | 595 | 86 | 280 | 30 | 9 | 280 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 251 | 217 | 30 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 98 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 138 | 250 | 198 | 448 | 60 | 221 | 39 | 6 | 197 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Tampa Tarpons | — | 233 | 205 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 96 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 156 | 251 | 220 | 471 | 63 | 254 | 41 | 6 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 251 | 217 | 30 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 98 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 138 | 250 | 198 | 448 | 60 | 221 | 39 | 6 | 197 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Tampa Tarpons | — | 233 | 205 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 96 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 156 | 251 | 220 | 471 | 63 | 254 | 41 | 6 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | NYY | 0% | 343 | 310 | 54 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 101 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 174 | 245 | 251 | 496 | 77 | 241 | 29 | 6 | 230 | 42 | -24 | +0 | +0 | +6 | +7 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | NYY | 34% | 182 | 165 | 31 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 52 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 180 | 252 | 270 | 522 | 89 | 244 | 29 | 6 | 240 | 49 | -11 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +4 | -0.4 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB MLE | NYY | 48% | 273 | 247 | 46 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 77 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 186 | 258 | 284 | 542 | 98 | 248 | 28 | 6 | 248 | 54 | -15 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +6 | -0.4 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB MLE | NYY | 53% | 350 | 316 | 60 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 23 | 97 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 191 | 263 | 295 | 558 | 104 | 251 | 28 | 7 | 255 | 59 | -17 | +1 | +0 | +6 | +8 | -0.3 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB MLE | NYY | 55% | 392 | 354 | 69 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 26 | 108 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 194 | 266 | 302 | 569 | 109 | 253 | 28 | 7 | 259 | 62 | -18 | +1 | +0 | +7 | +8 | -0.2 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB MLE | NYY | 56% | 416 | 376 | 74 | 14 | 2 | 8 | 28 | 113 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 196 | 269 | 308 | 577 | 111 | 255 | 27 | 7 | 262 | 64 | -18 | +1 | +0 | +7 | +9 | -0.1 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB MLE | NYY | 55% | 425 | 384 | 75 | 14 | 2 | 8 | 29 | 116 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 195 | 268 | 305 | 573 | 110 | 254 | 27 | 7 | 261 | 63 | -19 | +1 | +0 | +8 | +9 | -0.1 |
| 2034 | 28 | MLB MLE | NYY | 55% | 425 | 384 | 75 | 14 | 2 | 8 | 29 | 117 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 193 | 266 | 300 | 566 | 107 | 253 | 28 | 7 | 258 | 61 | -20 | +0 | -1 | +8 | +9 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | NYY | 34% | 63 | 57 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 181 | 253 | 273 | 526 | 92 | 244 | 29 | 6 | 242 | 49 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +1 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB CTX | NYY | 48% | 132 | 120 | 22 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 37 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 187 | 259 | 288 | 547 | 101 | 248 | 28 | 6 | 250 | 54 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +3 | -0.2 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB CTX | NYY | 53% | 185 | 167 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 51 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 191 | 264 | 299 | 563 | 108 | 251 | 28 | 6 | 257 | 59 | -9 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +4 | -0.1 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB CTX | NYY | 55% | 215 | 194 | 38 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 59 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 195 | 267 | 307 | 575 | 112 | 253 | 27 | 7 | 261 | 62 | -10 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +5 | -0.1 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB CTX | NYY | 56% | 232 | 209 | 42 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 63 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 197 | 270 | 313 | 583 | 115 | 255 | 27 | 7 | 265 | 64 | -10 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +5 | -0.0 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB CTX | NYY | 55% | 234 | 211 | 42 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 64 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 196 | 269 | 310 | 579 | 114 | 254 | 27 | 7 | 263 | 63 | -10 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +5 | -0.1 |
| 2034 | 28 | MLB CTX | NYY | 55% | 232 | 209 | 41 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 64 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 194 | 267 | 305 | 572 | 111 | 253 | 28 | 7 | 260 | 61 | -11 | +0 | -0 | +4 | +5 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1293 | 1167 | 227 | 42 | 6 | 25 | 86 | 356 | 29 | 23 | 6 | 195 | 267 | 305 | 572 | 111 | 255 | 28 | 7 | 259 | 53 | -61 | +2 | -0 | +23 | +28 | -0.8 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 587 | 114 | 21 | 3 | 13 | 43 | 179 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 194 | 267 | 307 | 574 | 112 | 254 | 28 | 7 | 259 | 53 | -31 | +1 | -0 | +12 | +14 | -0.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3083 | 2771 | 513 | 97 | 14 | 49 | 200 | 914 | 87 | 73 | 19 | 185 | 262 | 283 | 545 | 98 | 254 | 30 | 6 | 247 | 53 | -127 | +5 | -1 | +46 | +56 | -2.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 584 | 107 | 20 | 3 | 10 | 42 | 193 | 18 | 15 | 4 | 183 | 259 | 279 | 538 | 96 | 252 | 30 | 6 | 247 | 53 | -32 | +1 | -0 | +12 | +14 | -0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ATampa Tarpons · 233 PAwOBA .276 → .212 (−64)K% 30.5% → 41.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.47% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 41.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.44% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 6.61% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.72% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 3.74% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.62% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.993 | ×1.015 | 21.89% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.94% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.993 | ×1.015 | 3.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.993 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.15% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 2.56% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.993.
Result: wOBA .276 → .212; ISO .086 → .062; BABIP .280 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Yankees · 185 PAwOBA .317 → .201 (−116)K% 26.5% → 38.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.49% | ÷1.001 | ×1.440 | — | — | 38.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.19% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 5.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 6.49% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 4.65% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.15% | ÷1.056 | ×0.820 | ×0.966 | ×0.995 | 15.78% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.62% | ÷1.043 | ×0.720 | ×0.966 | ×0.995 | 6.38% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.96% | ÷1.008 | ×0.720 | ×0.966 | ×0.995 | 0.66% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.92% | ÷2.059 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 0.72% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 312, 1B 111, 2B 109, 3B 102, K 100, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.966.
Result: wOBA .317 → .201; ISO .118 → .062; BABIP .314 → .223. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ATampa Tarpons · 66 PAwOBA .249 → .186 (−63)K% 30.3% → 41.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.30% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 41.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.58% | ÷0.971 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 5.54% |
| HBP% /PA | 9.09% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 7.30% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷1.119 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.030 | 16.94% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.71% | ÷1.046 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.030 | 4.67% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.913 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.842 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 68, 1B 124, 2B 109, 3B 83, K 100, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .249 → .186; ISO .036 → .026; BABIP .257 → .216. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).