Reudis Diaz

P ACL White Sox
Age 21 RHP 6'1" / 180 lbs ROK
Overview
ROKPROSPECT
ETA2028MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202519ROKCWS210282.282.5615.7%6.1%—K 10.6% · BB 7.6% · FIP 3.16
202620ROKCWS150166.063.4117.7%13.9%—K 12.1% · BB 17.4% · FIP 4.29
2027PROJ21MLBCWS——04.904.9019.0%11.4%—
2028PROJ49% MLB22MLBCWS100104.694.6020.6%10.3%-0.0
Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 98%
CompsMike Morrison (age 22) · Austin Mason (age 21) · Joangel Gonzalez (age 20)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 126118vR 110
ERA4.90
FIP4.90
K%19.0%
BB%11.4%
K-BB%7.6%
Proj IP13
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 13 IP
K: -0.3 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-0KBB: -0.4 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-0BBCONTACT: -0.3 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-0CONTACTSTAM: +0.5 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+1STAMTotal WAR: -0.05 (13 IP)-0.1WAR
-0.10.02728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†4550

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
202317ROK MLEDSL White Sox16230137217212%1.910.4%6.4%4.0%1.7%6.603.94—
202317ROK RAWDSL White Sox16230137217212%1.915.3%5.1%10.2%1.5%6.603.27—
202418ROK MLEDSL White Sox9735144346278%3.916.1%5.2%10.8%1.3%2.043.13—
202418ROK MLEDSL White Sox9735144346278%3.916.1%5.2%10.8%1.3%2.043.13—
202418ROK RAWDSL White Sox9735144346278%3.923.6%4.2%19.4%1.4%2.042.42—
202519ROK MLEACL White Sox2102811518700%1.310.6%7.6%3.0%0.0%2.283.16—
202519ROK MLEACL White Sox2102811518700%1.310.6%7.6%3.0%0.0%2.283.16—
202519ROK RAWACL White Sox2102811518700%1.315.7%6.1%9.6%0.0%2.282.56—
202620ROK MLEACL White Sox1501679141100%1.112.1%17.4%-5.4%0.0%6.064.29—
202620ROK MLEACL White Sox1501679141100%1.112.1%17.4%-5.4%0.0%6.064.29—
202620ROK RAWACL White Sox1501679141100%1.117.7%13.9%3.8%0.0%6.063.41—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202721MLBCWS——0——————19.0%11.4%7.6%2.9%4.904.90—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202822MLB MLECWS200208718920%1.020.6%10.3%10.3%2.8%4.694.60-0.0
202822MLB CTXCWS10010429410%1.020.6%10.3%10.3%2.8%4.694.60-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW10010439410%1.020.6%10.3%10.3%2.8%4.694.22+0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW190020084417979200%1.120.6%10.3%10.3%2.8%4.694.22+0.8
Career— MLE6191094755939415%1.812.5%8.2%4.3%0.9%3.953.57-0.0
/ 200 IP— MLE1121620086910871815%1.812.5%8.2%4.3%0.9%3.953.57-0.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 ROKACL White Sox · 16 IPFIP 3.37 → 4.29 (+0.92)K% 17.7% → 12.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF17.72%—×0.68012.05%
BB% (unintentional) /BF13.92%—×1.25017.41%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.000×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 3.37 → 4.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ROKACL White Sox · 28 IPFIP 2.55 → 3.16 (+0.62)K% 15.7% → 10.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF15.65%—×0.68010.64%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.09%—×1.2507.61%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.128×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 126).

Result: FIP 2.55 → 3.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 ROKDSL White Sox · 35 IPFIP 2.40 → 3.13 (+0.74)K% 23.6% → 16.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.61%—×0.68016.06%
BB% (unintentional) /BF4.17%—×1.2505.21%
HR / BF /BF1.39%÷1.463×1.4001.33%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 193).

Result: FIP 2.40 → 3.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 ROKDSL White Sox · 30 IPFIP 3.25 → 3.94 (+0.68)K% 15.3% → 10.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF15.33%—×0.68010.42%
BB% (unintentional) /BF5.11%—×1.2506.39%
HR / BF /BF1.46%÷1.233×1.4001.66%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 147).

Result: FIP 3.25 → 3.94, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).