Devon Fisher
P Greenville Drive| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 20 | ROKGCL Red Sox | 10 | 0 | 15 | 9.20 | 3.10 | 24.3% | 10.0% | — | K 16.5% · BB 12.5% · FIP 4.39 | |
| 2018 | 22 | ABOS | 40 | 0 | 58 | 3.57 | 4.39 | 19.5% | 10.9% | — | K 14.4% · BB 12.9% · FIP 5.62 | |
| 2019 | 23 | MIX3 levels | 24 | 0 | 34 | 6.95 | 4.64 | 23.5% | 13.0% | — | K 16.4% · BB 16.6% · FIP 6.03 | |
| 2020 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 28 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 30 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Red Sox | 10 | 0 | 15 | 70 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 16.5% | 12.5% | 4.0% | 2.0% | 9.20 | 4.39 | — |
| 2016 | 20 | ROK RAW | GCL Red Sox | 10 | 0 | 15 | 70 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 24.3% | 10.0% | 14.3% | 1.4% | 9.20 | 3.10 | — |
| 2018 | 22 | A MLE | Greenville Drive | 40 | 0 | 58 | 257 | 50 | 28 | 7 | 0% | 1.4 | 14.4% | 12.9% | 1.5% | 3.8% | 3.57 | 5.62 | — |
| 2018 | 22 | A RAW | Greenville Drive | 40 | 0 | 58 | 257 | 50 | 28 | 7 | 0% | 1.4 | 19.5% | 10.9% | 8.6% | 2.7% | 3.57 | 4.39 | — |
| 2019 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 24 | 0 | 34 | 162 | 38 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 16.4% | 16.6% | -0.2% | 4.0% | 6.95 | 6.03 | — |
| 2019 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 24 | 0 | 34 | 162 | 38 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 23.5% | 13.0% | 10.5% | 3.1% | 6.95 | 4.64 | — |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | 74 | 0 | 106 | 489 | 75 | 69 | 18 | 0% | 1.4 | 15.4% | 14.0% | 1.3% | 3.6% | 5.42 | 5.58 | — | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 139 | 0 | 200 | 920 | 141 | 129 | 33 | 0% | 1.4 | 15.4% | 14.0% | 1.3% | 3.6% | 5.42 | 5.58 | -2.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2019 AGreenville Drive · 19 IPFIP 4.99 → 6.19 (+1.20)K% 22.4% → 16.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.35% | — | ×0.740 | 16.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.41% | — | ×1.180 | 11.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.71% | ÷1.091 | ×1.300 | 5.61% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).
Result: FIP 4.99 → 6.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Salem Red Sox · 10 IPFIP 4.87 → 5.82 (+0.95)K% 21.0% → 16.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.97% | — | ×0.770 | 16.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.97% | — | ×1.150 | 24.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.61% | ÷1.080 | ×1.250 | 1.87% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 4.87 → 5.82, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AGreenville Drive · 58 IPFIP 4.33 → 5.62 (+1.29)K% 19.5% → 14.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.46% | — | ×0.740 | 14.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.89% | — | ×1.180 | 12.86% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.72% | ÷0.923 | ×1.300 | 3.84% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 4.33 → 5.62, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 ROKGCL Red Sox · 15 IPFIP 3.10 → 4.39 (+1.29)K% 24.3% → 16.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.29% | — | ×0.680 | 16.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×1.250 | 12.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.43% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 2.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.10 → 4.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).