Norbis Diaz

P FCL Astros

Age 22 RHP 6'0" / 165 lbs ROK

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2023	18	ROKDSL Astros Bl…	9	2	15	6.14	4.46	22.6%	17.9%	—	K 15.4% · BB 22.3% · FIP 5.59
2024	19	ROKDSL Astros Or…	10	9	28	2.93	3.21	20.2%	10.5%	—	K 13.7% · BB 13.2% · FIP 4.36
2025	20	MIX2 levels	18	0	32	6.25	5.59	22.3%	17.8%	—	K 16.5% · BB 21.8% · FIP 7.31
2027PROJ	22	MLBHOU	15	0	16	5.36	5.36	21.5%	16.0%	-0.1
2028PROJ49% MLB	23	MLBHOU	14	0	15	5.09	4.97	22.4%	13.8%	-0.1

Next 2 projected WAR -0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsJuan Mendez (age 22) · Blake Holub (age 23) · Joey Matulovich (age 22)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 135127vR 119

ERA5.36

FIP5.36

K%21.5%

BB%16.0%

K-BB%5.5%

Proj IP16

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 16 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5055

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2023	18	ROK MLE	DSL Astros Blue	9	2	15	84	19	15	1	22%	1.6	15.4%	22.3%	-6.9%	1.8%	6.14	5.59	—
2023	18	ROK RAW	DSL Astros Blue	9	2	15	84	19	15	1	22%	1.6	22.6%	17.9%	4.8%	1.2%	6.14	4.46	—
2024	19	ROK MLE	DSL Astros Orange	10	9	28	114	23	12	1	90%	2.8	13.7%	13.2%	0.6%	1.4%	2.93	4.36	—
2024	19	ROK MLE	DSL Astros Orange	10	9	28	114	23	12	1	90%	2.8	13.7%	13.2%	0.6%	1.4%	2.93	4.36	—
2024	19	ROK RAW	DSL Astros Orange	10	9	28	114	23	12	1	90%	2.8	20.2%	10.5%	9.6%	0.9%	2.93	3.21	—
2025	20	MIX MLE	2 levels	18	0	32	157	35	28	5	0%	1.8	16.5%	21.8%	-5.3%	5.2%	6.25	7.31	—
2025	20	MIX MLE	2 levels	18	0	32	157	35	28	5	0%	1.8	16.5%	21.8%	-5.3%	5.2%	6.25	7.31	—
2025	20	MIX RAW	2 levels	18	0	32	157	35	28	5	0%	1.8	22.3%	17.8%	4.5%	3.2%	6.25	5.59	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	22	MLB	HOU	15	0	16	68	15	11	2	0%	1.1	21.5%	16.0%	5.5%	3.0%	5.36	5.36	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	23	MLB MLE	HOU	28	0	30	125	28	17	4	0%	1.1	22.4%	13.8%	8.6%	3.0%	5.09	4.97	-0.1
2028	23	MLB CTX	HOU	14	0	15	63	14	9	2	0%	1.1	22.4%	13.8%	8.6%	3.0%	5.09	4.97	-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		14	0	15	61	14	8	2	0%	1.0	22.4%	13.8%	8.6%	3.0%	5.09	4.59	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	192	110	27	0%	1.1	22.4%	13.8%	8.6%	3.0%	5.09	4.59	-0.1
Career	—	MLE		37	11	74	355	54	68	11	30%	2.0	15.3%	19.1%	-3.8%	3.1%	4.99	5.96	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		100	30	200	959	147	184	30	30%	2.0	15.3%	19.1%	-3.8%	3.1%	4.99	5.96	-1.0

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Norbis Diaz (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.36	21.5%	16.0%	3.0%	—	4.97	22.4%	8.6%	30	-0.39	—	—	—
Juan Mendez R 2021 · 4.45 FIP	22	SW	4.45	20.5%	14.2%	2.3%	.271	5.07	21.9%	6.1%	128	+0.62	3.69	156	87
Blake Holub R 2022 · 4.55 FIP	23	SU	4.55	21.7%	15.3%	2.4%	.339	3.73	23.4%	12.7%	156	-0.82	3.22	258	83
Joey Matulovich R 2019 · 5.52 FIP	22	SW	5.52	19.8%	14.6%	4.1%	.378	5.04	20.5%	8.9%	133	-0.48	3.22	201	83
Tyler Santana R 2021 · 4.28 FIP	23	SU	4.28	20.3%	15.1%	1.8%	.333	4.37	16.0%	5.7%	259	+0.09	3.37	401	83
Alec Barger R 2021 · 4.55 FIP	23	SW	4.55	21.7%	13.6%	2.8%	.289	4.17	21.3%	9.4%	148	-0.38	3.85	242	82
Jordan Brink R 2016 · 5.96 FIP	23	SW	5.96	18.3%	19.2%	3.6%	.233	—	—	—	—	—	3.99	132	82
Junior Rincon R 2015 · 4.93 FIP	23	SU	4.93	17.8%	13.8%	2.9%	.318	3.75	17.6%	5.1%	82	-1.18	3.52	113	81
Trayson Kubo R 2019 · 5.01 FIP	21	SW	5.01	19.8%	15.6%	2.9%	.450	4.82	17.7%	1.4%	66	-0.19	4.48	107	80
Cre Finfrock R 2018 · 4.27 FIP	22	SW	4.27	17.9%	16.5%	1.1%	.286	4.63	23.0%	11.3%	38	+0.36	4.27	103	80
Yunior Montero R 2015 · 4.82 FIP	22	SW	4.82	16.9%	14.1%	2.5%	.276	4.58	21.5%	6.2%	91	-0.24	3.65	127	80
Victor Simeon R 2023 · 5.53 FIP	22	SW	5.53	20.3%	15.7%	3.9%	.333	3.87	25.6%	5.4%	81	-1.66	3.22	180	80
Sam Ryan R 2021 · 4.38 FIP	22	SW	4.38	16.4%	14.7%	1.5%	.328	3.85	13.7%	2.9%	49	-0.53	3.80	178	80
Radhames Liz R 2007 · 5.07 FIP	23	SW	5.07	19.7%	18.0%	2.5%	.301	5.66	14.5%	2.3%	84	+0.59	2.81	219	80
Josh White R 2023 · 5.12 FIP	22	SW	5.12	17.7%	13.9%	3.2%	.244	3.15	27.7%	17.2%	182	-1.97	1.84	247	79
James Acuna R 2021 · 5.12 FIP	23	SU	5.12	21.3%	17.0%	3.0%	.302	4.33	19.4%	4.6%	60	-0.79	4.33	107	79
Will Varmette R 2024 · 5.06 FIP	21	SU	5.06	22.8%	19.3%	2.6%	.302	5.13	16.1%	2.3%	135	+0.07	4.69	182	79
Jhonny Polanco R 2015 · 4.75 FIP	23	SW	4.75	18.9%	14.2%	2.6%	.283	4.06	21.3%	5.7%	48	-0.69	4.06	116	78
Eiberson Castellano R 2023 · 4.25 FIP	22	SW	4.25	18.3%	14.1%	1.7%	.359	4.06	20.9%	10.6%	251	-0.19	3.67	386	78
Hayden Snelsire R 2024 · 5.10 FIP	23	SU	5.10	18.9%	13.8%	3.4%	.272	4.28	20.0%	13.7%	135	-0.82	3.83	178	78
Keegan Collett R 2019 · 5.05 FIP	21	SW	5.05	21.9%	24.6%	1.2%	.321	4.68	29.1%	9.0%	84	-0.37	3.93	184	78