Samil Dishmey
OF Rancho Cucamonga Quakes| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | ROKLAA | 169 | .246/.385/.312 | 0 | 10 | 32 | — | .155/.260/.189 |
| 2025 | 19 | ROKLAA | 108 | .232/.324/.305 | 2 | 3 | 17 | — | .162/.231/.232 |
| 2026 | 20 | A/ROKLAA | 170 | .302/.381/.497 | 4 | 5 | 68 | — | .209/.275/.320 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBLAA | 280 | .187/.250/.279 | 4 | 5 | 49 | -0.4 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 22 | MLBLAA | 52 | .191/.255/.291 | 1 | 1 | 55 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 25 / POW 43
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | ROK | DSL Angels | — | 119 | 102 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 17 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 294 | 395 | 333 | 728 | 39 | 345 | 14 | 12 | 342 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK | DSL Angels | — | 169 | 138 | 34 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 26 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 246 | 385 | 312 | 696 | 65 | 304 | 15 | 18 | 330 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK | ACL Angels | — | 108 | 95 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 28 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 232 | 324 | 305 | 629 | 74 | 308 | 26 | 9 | 295 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 90 | 82 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 33 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 256 | 322 | 439 | 761 | 183 | 404 | 37 | 7 | 337 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK | ACL Angels | — | 80 | 67 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 358 | 449 | 567 | 1.016 | 209 | 458 | 22 | 11 | 435 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 119 | 106 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 21 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 208 | 294 | 245 | 539 | 38 | 238 | 18 | 8 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 169 | 148 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 31 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 155 | 260 | 189 | 450 | 34 | 196 | 18 | 12 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL Angels | — | 108 | 99 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 42 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 162 | 231 | 232 | 464 | 71 | 239 | 39 | 6 | 193 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 90 | 84 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 45 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 167 | 222 | 262 | 484 | 95 | 364 | 50 | 4 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK MLE | ACL Angels | — | 80 | 70 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 257 | 333 | 386 | 719 | 129 | 352 | 32 | 8 | 306 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 119 | 106 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 21 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 208 | 294 | 245 | 539 | 38 | 250 | 18 | 8 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Angels | — | 119 | 102 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 17 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 294 | 395 | 333 | 728 | 39 | 345 | 14 | 12 | 342 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 169 | 148 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 31 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 155 | 260 | 189 | 450 | 34 | 197 | 18 | 12 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Angels | — | 169 | 138 | 34 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 26 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 246 | 385 | 312 | 696 | 65 | 304 | 15 | 18 | 330 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL Angels | — | 108 | 99 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 42 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 162 | 231 | 232 | 464 | 71 | 255 | 39 | 6 | 193 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK RAW | ACL Angels | — | 108 | 95 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 28 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 232 | 324 | 305 | 629 | 74 | 308 | 26 | 9 | 295 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 170 | 154 | 33 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 71 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 214 | 280 | 344 | 624 | 130 | 370 | 42 | 6 | 268 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 170 | 149 | 45 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 51 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 302 | 381 | 497 | 878 | 195 | 432 | 30 | 9 | 383 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 119 | 105 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 21 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 210 | 294 | 248 | 542 | 38 | 238 | 18 | 8 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 169 | 146 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 31 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 158 | 260 | 192 | 452 | 34 | 196 | 18 | 12 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL Angels | — | 108 | 98 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 42 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 163 | 231 | 235 | 466 | 71 | 239 | 39 | 6 | 193 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 170 | 154 | 33 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 71 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 214 | 280 | 344 | 624 | 130 | 358 | 42 | 6 | 268 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 169 | 146 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 31 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 158 | 260 | 192 | 452 | 34 | 196 | 18 | 12 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL Angels | — | 108 | 98 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 42 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 163 | 231 | 235 | 466 | 71 | 239 | 39 | 6 | 193 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 170 | 154 | 33 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 71 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 214 | 280 | 344 | 624 | 130 | 358 | 42 | 6 | 268 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | LAA | 0% | 280 | 257 | 48 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 88 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 187 | 250 | 279 | 528 | 92 | 264 | 31 | 6 | 241 | 49 | -17 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +6 | -0.4 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | LAA | 34% | 152 | 139 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 47 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 192 | 256 | 293 | 548 | 101 | 267 | 31 | 7 | 249 | 55 | -8 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +3 | -0.6 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | LAA | 34% | 52 | 48 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 191 | 255 | 291 | 546 | 100 | 265 | 31 | 6 | 248 | 55 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 52 | 48 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 188 | 250 | 292 | 542 | 104 | 258 | 31 | 6 | 248 | 45 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 600 | 112 | 25 | 0 | 12 | 38 | 200 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 187 | 249 | 288 | 538 | 102 | 258 | 31 | 6 | 248 | 45 | -35 | +2 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 817 | 738 | 138 | 20 | 5 | 9 | 62 | 243 | 14 | 29 | 14 | 187 | 263 | 264 | 527 | 77 | 264 | 30 | 8 | 235 | 45 | -14 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +5 | -1.0 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 587 | 110 | 16 | 4 | 7 | 49 | 193 | 11 | 23 | 11 | 187 | 263 | 264 | 527 | 77 | 265 | 30 | 8 | 235 | 45 | -37 | +1 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 90 PAwOBA .328 → .235 (−93)K% 36.7% → 49.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 36.67% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 49.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 4.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.22% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 1.76% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.015 | 22.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.20% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.015 | 8.60% |
| Triples /BIP | 4.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.015 | 3.77% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 3.31% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .328 → .235; ISO .183 → .125; BABIP .404 → .364. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKACL Angels · 80 PAwOBA .429 → .306 (−123)K% 22.5% → 32.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.50% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 32.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.25% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 6.87% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.50% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 1.77% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.61% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.985 | 24.73% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.24% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 8.68% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.04% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 1.45% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 3.14% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .429 → .306; ISO .209 → .148; BABIP .458 → .352. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKACL Angels · 108 PAwOBA .287 → .193 (−95)K% 25.9% → 38.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.93% | ÷0.969 | ×1.440 | — | — | 38.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.26% | ÷1.082 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 5.28% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.78% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 1.99% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.36% | ÷1.015 | ×0.820 | ×0.976 | ×0.995 | 22.24% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.49% | ÷0.992 | ×0.720 | ×0.976 | ×0.995 | 1.05% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.134 | ×0.720 | ×0.976 | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.99% | ÷0.873 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 2.65% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 103, 2B 98, 3B 127, K 94, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.976.
Result: wOBA .287 → .193; ISO .074 → .055; BABIP .308 → .239. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 DSLDSL Angels · 169 PAwOBA .323 → .216 (−107)K% 15.4% → 18.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.38% | ÷1.038 | ×1.220 | — | — | 18.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.75% | ÷1.064 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 11.62% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.59% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 0.41% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.11% | ÷1.052 | ×0.680 | ×1.030 | ×0.995 | 15.97% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.46% | ÷1.081 | ×0.600 | ×1.030 | ×0.995 | 2.54% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.79% | ÷0.961 | ×0.600 | ×1.030 | ×0.995 | 1.14% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.068 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 114, 1B 110, 2B 116, 3B 92, K 108, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.
Result: wOBA .323 → .216; ISO .065 → .041; BABIP .304 → .196. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 DSLDSL Angels · 119 PAwOBA .334 → .232 (−102)K% 14.3% → 17.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.29% | ÷1.002 | ×1.220 | — | — | 17.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.76% | ÷1.018 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 8.15% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.52% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 1.78% |
| Singles /BIP | 32.94% | ÷1.028 | ×0.680 | ×1.042 | ×1.008 | 22.89% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.18% | ÷0.927 | ×0.600 | ×1.042 | ×1.008 | 0.80% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.600 | ×1.042 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.18% | ÷0.852 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.65% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 106, 2B 85, 3B 130, K 100, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.042.
Result: wOBA .334 → .232; ISO .039 → .023; BABIP .345 → .238. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).