Jake Reinisch
OF Lansing Lugnuts| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 24 | A+/ROKOAK | 224 | .298/.442/.489 | 6 | 2 | 106 | — | .244/.348/.395 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 25 | MLBOAK | 274 | .209/.307/.333 | 6 | 4 | 84 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 26 | MLBOAK | 39 | .217/.313/.346 | 1 | 1 | 85 | 0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ42% MLB | 27 | MLBOAK | 72 | .217/.312/.347 | 2 | 1 | 85 | 0.0 |
Tools · ContractCON 36 / POW 44
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 24 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 205 | 162 | 49 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 41 | 47 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 302 | 449 | 500 | 949 | 198 | 394 | 23 | 20 | 423 | 113 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | ROK | ACL Athletics | — | 19 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 250 | 368 | 375 | 743 | 125 | 364 | 26 | 11 | 343 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 205 | 176 | 45 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 27 | 60 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 256 | 361 | 415 | 776 | 159 | 349 | 29 | 13 | 335 | 113 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | ROK MLE | ACL Athletics | — | 19 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 118 | 211 | 176 | 387 | 59 | 267 | 37 | 5 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 224 | 193 | 47 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 28 | 67 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 244 | 348 | 394 | 742 | 150 | 347 | 30 | 12 | 325 | 106 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 224 | 178 | 53 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 43 | 52 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 298 | 442 | 489 | 931 | 191 | 392 | 23 | 19 | 416 | 106 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 224 | 191 | 47 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 28 | 67 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 246 | 348 | 398 | 746 | 152 | 342 | 30 | 12 | 325 | 106 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 224 | 191 | 47 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 28 | 67 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 246 | 348 | 398 | 746 | 152 | 342 | 30 | 12 | 325 | 106 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB MLE | OAK | 0% | 274 | 238 | 51 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 31 | 77 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 209 | 307 | 333 | 640 | 123 | 280 | 28 | 11 | 292 | 84 | -5 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +6 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | OAK | 30% | 130 | 113 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 36 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 211 | 308 | 336 | 644 | 125 | 281 | 28 | 12 | 293 | 85 | -2 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +3 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | OAK | 42% | 172 | 149 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 48 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 212 | 307 | 337 | 645 | 126 | 281 | 28 | 11 | 293 | 85 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +4 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | OAK | 30% | 39 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 217 | 313 | 346 | 659 | 129 | 290 | 28 | 10 | 299 | 85 | -1 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | 0.0 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | OAK | 42% | 72 | 63 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 217 | 312 | 347 | 659 | 129 | 290 | 28 | 11 | 299 | 85 | -1 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +2 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 111 | 98 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 214 | 306 | 347 | 653 | 133 | 281 | 28 | 11 | 299 | 92 | -2 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +2 | 0.0 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 574 | 123 | 23 | 0 | 18 | 70 | 182 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 214 | 306 | 348 | 655 | 134 | 281 | 28 | 11 | 299 | 92 | -12 | +2 | +0 | -4 | +14 | 0.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 625 | 542 | 121 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 73 | 179 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 223 | 323 | 362 | 685 | 138 | 305 | 29 | 12 | 304 | 92 | -7 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +9 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 564 | 126 | 22 | 6 | 15 | 76 | 186 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 223 | 323 | 363 | 687 | 140 | 304 | 29 | 12 | 304 | 92 | -12 | +0 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -0.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 205 PAwOBA .410 → .335 (−75)K% 22.9% → 29.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.93% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 29.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 19.02% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 13.35% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.98% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 0.76% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.012 | ×0.988 | 25.60% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.96% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.012 | ×0.988 | 5.63% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.61% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.012 | ×0.988 | 2.22% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.22% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 4.12% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.012.
Result: wOBA .410 → .335; ISO .198 → .161; BABIP .394 → .349. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKACL Athletics · 19 PAwOBA .334 → .216 (−118)K% 26.3% → 37.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.32% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 37.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.53% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.955 | 6.23% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.26% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 3.62% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.18% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.955 | 14.24% |
| Doubles /BIP | 18.18% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 12.50% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.955 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 19.5 → −4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .334 → .216; ISO .125 → .078; BABIP .364 → .267. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).