Brock Lundquist

PosOF
B/TL/R
Born1996-01-23
Age (2027)31
No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.
Overview
AALAST SEASON 2021
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
201822A+/A2 orgs494.286/.380/.47018284—.229/.304/.370
201923AATOR413.232/.309/.3516752—.195/.258/.290
202125AA/ROKTOR139.214/.324/.3595038—.163/.257/.275
Contract
No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
201822 A+Dunedin Blue Jays — 202178 601105 16355 10 337407483890 146390 178 392 105 — — — — — —
201822 ALansing Lugnuts — 292245 6111113 336810 10 249361461822 212286 2311 362 69 — — — — — —
201923 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats — 413370 862036 371054 75 232309351660 119307 259 299 52 — — — — — —
202125 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats — 11493 16102 15453 00 172306247554 75286 3913 262 28 — — — — — —
202125 ROKFCL Blue Jays — 2524 9103 180 00 3754007921.192 417462 324 510 86 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
201822 A+ MLEDunedin Blue Jays — 202183 521004 11515 10 284342404746 120353 255 324 105 — — — — — —
201822 A MLELansing Lugnuts — 292257 498110 219310 10 191278346624 156236 327 270 69 — — — — — —
201923 AA MLENew Hampshire Fisher Cats — 413379 741535 281274 75 195258290548 95274 317 245 52 — — — — — —
202125 AA MLENew Hampshire Fisher Cats — 11497 14102 11553 00 144252216469 72260 4810 209 28 — — — — — —
202125 ROK MLEFCL Blue Jays — 2524 6102 1120 00 250280542822 292330 484 296 86 — — — — — —
201822 A MLE2 teams — 494441 10018113 3114415 20 227300361660 134299 296 292 84 — — — — — —
201822 A RAW2 teams — 494423 12122118 4910315 20 286380470850 184333 2110 374 84 — — — — — —
201923 AA MLENew Hampshire Fisher Cats — 413379 741535 281274 75 195258290548 95277 317 245 52 — — — — — —
201923 AA RAWNew Hampshire Fisher Cats — 413370 862036 371054 75 232309351660 119307 259 299 52 — — — — — —
202125 AA MLE2 teams — 139122 18103 11673 00 148235230465 82273 488 225 38 — — — — — —
202125 AA RAW2 teams — 139117 25205 16533 00 214324359683 145323 3812 307 38 — — — — — —
201822 A MLE2 teams — 494445 10018113 3114415 20 225300357657 133284 296 292 84 — — — — — —
201923 AA MLENew Hampshire Fisher Cats — 413378 741535 281274 75 196258291549 95274 317 245 52 — — — — — —
202125 AA MLE2 teams — 139124 18103 11673 00 145235226461 81273 488 225 38 — — — — — —
▸ Career Totals
Career— MLE — 1046942 19234421 7033822 95 204275315590 111287 327 265 65 -43 -0 +0 -6 +23 -2.8
/ 162G— MLE — 650585 11921213 4321014 63 203274313587 109287 327 265 65 -27 +0 +0 -4 +14 -1.7

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2021 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 114 PAwOBA .263 → .209 (−54)K% 39.5% → 48.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA39.47%÷0.990×1.220——48.62%
BB% (unintentional) /PA13.16%÷0.966×0.690—×0.9989.38%
HBP% /PA2.63%—×0.850—×0.9982.23%
Singles /BIP27.08%÷1.022×0.940×1.008×0.99825.06%
Doubles /BIP2.08%÷1.039×0.870×1.008×0.9981.75%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.920×1.008×0.9980.00%
Home runs /BIP4.17%÷0.973×0.780—×0.9983.33%

Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 104, 2B 108, 3B 80, K 98, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.008.

Result: wOBA .263 → .209; ISO .075 → .057; BABIP .286 → .260. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 ROKFCL Blue Jays · 25 PAwOBA .494 → .296 (−198)K% 32.0% → 46.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA32.00%÷1.000×1.440——46.08%
BB% (unintentional) /PA4.00%÷1.000×0.620—×0.9452.34%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.720—×0.9450.00%
Singles /BIP31.25%÷1.000×0.820—×0.94524.22%
Doubles /BIP6.25%÷1.000×0.720—×0.9454.25%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.720—×0.9450.00%
Home runs /BIP18.75%÷1.000×0.780—×0.94513.82%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 19.5 → −5.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .494 → .296; ISO .417 → .246; BABIP .462 → .330. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 413 PAwOBA .292 → .245 (−48)K% 25.4% → 30.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA25.42%÷1.006×1.220——30.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.96%÷0.956×0.700—×1.0276.73%
HBP% /PA0.97%—×0.850—×1.0270.85%
Singles /BIP21.51%÷1.023×0.970×0.950×1.02719.90%
Doubles /BIP7.55%÷1.064×0.860×0.950×1.0275.95%
Triples /BIP1.13%÷0.900×0.950×0.950×1.0271.17%
Home runs /BIP2.26%÷0.860×0.780—×1.0272.11%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 72, 1B 105, 2B 113, 3B 80, K 101, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .292 → .245; ISO .119 → .100; BABIP .307 → .274. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 ALansing Lugnuts · 292 PAwOBA .354 → .270 (−84)K% 23.3% → 32.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA23.29%÷0.989×1.360——32.03%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.27%÷0.995×0.690——7.13%
HBP% /PA3.42%—×0.780——2.67%
Singles /BIP20.34%÷1.018×0.920×0.960—17.64%
Doubles /BIP6.21%÷1.033×0.830×0.960—4.79%
Triples /BIP0.56%÷1.150×0.910×0.960—0.43%
Home runs /BIP7.34%÷1.034×0.800——5.68%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 104, 2B 107, 3B 130, K 98, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.960.

Result: wOBA .354 → .270; ISO .212 → .157; BABIP .286 → .236. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 A+Dunedin Blue Jays · 202 PAwOBA .384 → .324 (−61)K% 17.3% → 25.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA17.33%÷0.979×1.420——25.14%
BB% (unintentional) /PA6.93%÷1.011×0.750—×1.0125.21%
HBP% /PA2.48%—×0.930—×1.0122.33%
Singles /BIP30.77%÷1.015×0.920×0.978×1.01227.61%
Doubles /BIP7.69%÷0.977×0.960×0.978×1.0127.48%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.005×0.810×0.978×1.0120.00%
Home runs /BIP3.50%÷1.147×0.880—×1.0122.71%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 129, 1B 103, 2B 95, 3B 101, K 96, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.

Result: wOBA .384 → .324; ISO .146 → .119; BABIP .390 → .353. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).