Jack Penney
SS FCL Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | ADET | 60 | .255/.367/.392 | 0 | 2 | 51 | — | .204/.283/.315 |
| 2025 | 22 | A+/A/INTL2 orgs | 422 | .251/.392/.345 | 6 | 8 | 80 | — | .203/.301/.288 |
| 2026 | 23 | ROKDET | 20 | .333/.400/.611 | 1 | 0 | 91 | — | .211/.250/.421 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBDET | 200 | .202/.290/.309 | 3 | 3 | 72 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 25 | MLBDET | 26 | .202/.289/.310 | 0 | 0 | 74 | -0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 26 | MLBDET | 66 | .204/.290/.315 | 1 | 1 | 76 | 0.0 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 60 | 51 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 255 | 367 | 392 | 759 | 137 | 394 | 30 | 15 | 343 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 306 | 252 | 66 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 46 | 62 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 262 | 386 | 373 | 759 | 111 | 324 | 20 | 15 | 347 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 43 | 33 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 121 | 326 | 121 | 447 | 200 | 30 | 16 | 249 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2025 | 22 | INTL | Scottsdale Scorpions | — | 73 | 54 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 278 | 458 | 352 | 810 | 74 | 412 | 27 | 21 | 381 | 144 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 20 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 333 | 400 | 611 | 1.011 | 278 | 333 | 10 | 10 | 438 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 60 | 54 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 204 | 283 | 315 | 598 | 111 | 333 | 40 | 10 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 306 | 269 | 59 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 82 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 219 | 307 | 316 | 623 | 97 | 287 | 27 | 9 | 278 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 43 | 35 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 256 | 86 | 342 | 173 | 42 | 12 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 20 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 211 | 250 | 421 | 671 | 211 | 244 | 15 | 5 | 303 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 60 | 54 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 204 | 283 | 315 | 598 | 111 | 367 | 40 | 10 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 60 | 51 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 255 | 367 | 392 | 759 | 137 | 394 | 30 | 15 | 343 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 422 | 365 | 75 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 42 | 121 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 205 | 306 | 290 | 597 | 85 | 285 | 29 | 10 | 266 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ RAW | 3 teams | — | 422 | 339 | 85 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 68 | 95 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 251 | 392 | 345 | 737 | 94 | 326 | 23 | 16 | 343 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 20 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 211 | 250 | 421 | 671 | 211 | 200 | 15 | 5 | 303 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | — | 20 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 333 | 400 | 611 | 1.011 | 278 | 333 | 10 | 10 | 438 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 60 | 54 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 204 | 283 | 315 | 598 | 111 | 333 | 40 | 10 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 422 | 366 | 75 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 42 | 121 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 205 | 306 | 290 | 596 | 85 | 273 | 29 | 10 | 266 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 20 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 211 | 250 | 421 | 671 | 211 | 244 | 15 | 5 | 303 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 60 | 54 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 204 | 283 | 315 | 598 | 111 | 333 | 40 | 10 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 422 | 366 | 75 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 42 | 121 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 205 | 306 | 290 | 596 | 85 | 273 | 29 | 10 | 266 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 20 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 211 | 250 | 421 | 671 | 211 | 244 | 15 | 5 | 303 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | DET | 0% | 200 | 176 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 51 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 202 | 290 | 309 | 599 | 107 | 261 | 26 | 10 | 274 | 72 | -7 | +0 | -1 | +2 | +4 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | DET | 30% | 86 | 77 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 205 | 292 | 317 | 609 | 112 | 263 | 26 | 9 | 278 | 74 | -3 | +0 | -0 | +1 | +2 | 0.0 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 44% | 149 | 132 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 37 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 207 | 294 | 322 | 616 | 115 | 264 | 25 | 9 | 281 | 76 | -4 | +0 | -1 | +2 | +3 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 49% | 194 | 172 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 49 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 208 | 294 | 324 | 618 | 116 | 265 | 25 | 9 | 281 | 77 | -5 | +0 | -1 | +2 | +4 | 0.0 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 51% | 232 | 205 | 43 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 59 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 209 | 293 | 324 | 617 | 115 | 266 | 25 | 9 | 281 | 76 | -7 | +0 | -2 | +2 | +5 | -0.0 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 51% | 250 | 222 | 47 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 63 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 208 | 292 | 322 | 614 | 114 | 266 | 25 | 9 | 280 | 76 | -7 | +0 | -2 | +3 | +5 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | DET | 30% | 26 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 202 | 289 | 310 | 599 | 108 | 259 | 27 | 8 | 274 | 74 | -1 | +0 | -0 | +0 | +1 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 44% | 66 | 59 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 204 | 290 | 315 | 605 | 111 | 260 | 26 | 9 | 276 | 76 | -2 | +0 | -0 | +1 | +1 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 49% | 95 | 85 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 205 | 291 | 317 | 607 | 112 | 261 | 25 | 9 | 277 | 77 | -3 | +0 | -0 | +1 | +2 | 0.0 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 51% | 119 | 106 | 22 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 30 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 205 | 290 | 316 | 607 | 111 | 262 | 25 | 9 | 277 | 76 | -3 | +0 | -1 | +1 | +3 | -0.0 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 51% | 129 | 115 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 205 | 289 | 315 | 604 | 110 | 262 | 26 | 9 | 276 | 76 | -4 | +0 | -1 | +1 | +3 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 435 | 389 | 77 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 40 | 111 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 198 | 279 | 298 | 578 | 100 | 256 | 26 | 9 | 276 | 72 | -12 | +1 | -3 | +5 | +9 | -0.0 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 581 | 115 | 21 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 166 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 198 | 280 | 296 | 576 | 98 | 257 | 26 | 9 | 276 | 72 | -19 | +1 | -4 | +7 | +14 | -0.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1463 | 1290 | 269 | 48 | 7 | 27 | 139 | 391 | 23 | 22 | 8 | 209 | 297 | 319 | 616 | 111 | 275 | 27 | 10 | 275 | 72 | -28 | +1 | -6 | +10 | +21 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 573 | 119 | 21 | 3 | 12 | 62 | 174 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 208 | 296 | 318 | 614 | 110 | 274 | 27 | 10 | 275 | 72 | -19 | +1 | -4 | +7 | +14 | -0.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Tigers · 20 PAwOBA .426 → .303 (−122)K% 10.0% → 14.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 14.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.955 | 5.92% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.75% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.955 | 14.68% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.50% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 8.60% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.25% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.955 | 4.66% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 19.5 → −4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .426 → .303; ISO .278 → .200; BABIP .333 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 306 PAwOBA .342 → .278 (−64)K% 20.3% → 26.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.26% | ÷0.960 | ×1.270 | — | — | 26.81% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.03% | ÷1.106 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 9.63% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.63% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 1.29% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.79% | ÷1.027 | ×0.920 | ×0.997 | ×0.998 | 22.98% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.79% | ÷0.948 | ×0.810 | ×0.997 | ×0.998 | 4.92% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.53% | ÷0.900 | ×0.850 | ×0.997 | ×0.998 | 0.49% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.63% | ÷0.850 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 2.47% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 105, 2B 90, 3B 80, K 92, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.
Result: wOBA .342 → .278; ISO .111 → .101; BABIP .324 → .287. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 43 PAwOBA .245 → .184 (−61)K% 30.2% → 41.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.23% | ÷0.998 | ×1.360 | — | — | 41.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 16.28% | ÷0.945 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 11.77% |
| HBP% /PA | 6.98% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 5.39% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷1.051 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.990 | 17.33% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.971 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.864 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 110, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 100, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .245 → .184; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .200 → .173. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 60 PAwOBA .335 → .243 (−92)K% 30.0% → 39.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.00% | ÷1.028 | ×1.360 | — | — | 39.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.00% | ÷1.061 | ×0.690 | — | — | 9.75% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.24% | ÷0.980 | ×0.920 | — | — | 22.76% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.09% | ÷1.351 | ×0.830 | — | — | 5.58% |
| Triples /BIP | 6.06% | ÷1.106 | ×0.910 | — | — | 4.99% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.099 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 120, 1B 96, 2B 170, 3B 121, K 106, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .335 → .243; ISO .137 → .093; BABIP .394 → .333. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .