Travis Honeyman

OF Springfield Cardinals
Age 25 R/R 6'2" / 190 lbs AA HR -14%BB -5% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2035
Overview
AAPROSPECTMiLBFA 2036
OGV OFP35OGV rank#2373ETA2029MLB%2%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202422A/ROKSTL82.342/.415/.4930277—.264/.317/.371
202523A+/A/INTL2 orgs410.273/.401/.36351486—.245/.348/.317
202624AA/ASTL329.273/.375/.40492686—.242/.323/.345
2027PROJMLE25MLBSTL4.231/.314/.3200084-0.0
2028PROJ31% MLB26MLBSTL72.232/.315/.32713860.0
2029PROJ42% MLB27MLBSTL111.232/.314/.32824860.0
Next 3 projected WAR 0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2035Service0.0First FA2036
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029MiLB2030Pre-Arb$0.8M2031Pre-Arb$0.9M2032Pre-Arb$0.9M2033Ext$3M2034Ext$5M+1
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 AA
K%88
Speed86
Whiff%82
Z-Con%79
wOBA71
Chase%70
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 -0.1 / P90 0.2, comp-based) · star 1% · didn't stick 94%
CompsMurphy Stehly (age 25) · Travis Jones (age 25) · Andy González (age 25)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONstats below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+†84
AVG/OBP/SLG.231 / .314 / .320
PA4
HR0
K%25
BB%8
BABIP287
ISO89
MLB%2%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -3.9 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-4BATRUN: +0.7 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)+1RUNFLD: +0.0 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+0FLDPOS: -1.2 runs (Positional adjustment)-1POSREP: +4.4 runs (Replacement-level credit)+4REPTotal WAR: +0.10+0.1WAR
0.00.51.00.00.00.00.027282930313233343536
━ projected WAR━ paid WAR ($/8M) surplus deficit-$3M ctrl surplus
Tools · ContractCON 50 / POW 25
Toolsscout grade
CONTACT50
scouting grade only
POWER25
scouting grade only
EYE50
scouting grade only
SPEED45
scouting grade only
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2030
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2035
First FA Year   2036
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2030
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2030
2029MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2030
2030Pre-Arb$0.8M———
2031Pre-Arb$0.9M———
2032Pre-Arb$0.9M———
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2035Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $-0.8M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202422 APalm Beach Cardinals — 6056 18700 381 11 321367446813 125375 135 363 59 — — — — — —
202422 ROKFCL Cardinals — 2217 7400 530 11 4125456471.193 235500 1423 515 127 — — — — — —
202523 A+Peoria Chiefs — 228183 49511 274313 30 268399322722 55333 1912 336 71 — — — — — —
202523 APalm Beach Cardinals — 130106 34512 20194 71 321446443890 123376 1515 405 114 — — — — — —
202523 INTLGlendale Desert Dogs — 5244 8102 5122 40 182294341635 159194 2310 287 80 — — — — — —
202624 AASpringfield Cardinals — 296256 72528 33496 255 281376410786 129320 1711 356 89 — — — — — —
202624 APalm Beach Cardinals — 3326 5101 453 11 192364346710 154200 1512 336 59 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202422 A MLEPalm Beach Cardinals — 6057 14500 2111 11 246283333617 88289 183 255 59 — — — — — —
202422 ROK MLEFCL Cardinals — 2219 6300 340 11 316409474883 158365 1814 356 127 — — — — — —
202523 A+ MLEPeoria Chiefs — 228192 43411 185713 30 224332271603 47288 258 273 71 — — — — — —
202523 A MLEPalm Beach Cardinals — 130113 32512 13264 71 283377398775 115348 2010 336 114 — — — — — —
202624 AA MLESpringfield Cardinals — 296266 66426 23606 255 248322346668 98298 208 300 89 — — — — — —
202624 A MLEPalm Beach Cardinals — 3327 5101 373 11 185333333667 148172 219 256 59 — — — — — —
202422 A MLE2 teams — 8276 18700 5151 22 237293329622 92295 186 282 77 — — — — — —
202422 A RAW2 teams — 8273 251100 8111 22 342415493908 151403 1310 404 77 — — — — — —
202523 A+ MLE3 teams — 410349 861023 369519 141 246349312661 66323 239 296 86 — — — — — —
202523 A+ RAW3 teams — 410333 911125 527419 141 273401363764 90331 1813 351 86 — — — — — —
202624 AA MLE2 teams — 329293 71527 26679 266 242323345668 102291 208 296 86 — — — — — —
202624 AA RAW2 teams — 329282 77629 37549 266 273375404779 131309 1611 354 86 — — — — — —
202422 A MLE2 teams — 8276 18700 5151 22 237293329622 92309 186 282 77 — — — — — —
202523 A+ MLE3 teams — 410352 861023 369519 141 244349310659 65310 239 296 86 — — — — — —
202624 AA MLE2 teams — 329291 71527 26679 266 244323347670 103285 208 296 86 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202422 A MLE2 teams — 8276 18700 5151 22 237293329622 92309 186 282 77 — — — — — —
202523 A+ MLE3 teams — 410352 861023 369519 141 244349310659 65310 239 296 86 — — — — — —
202624 AA MLE2 teams — 329291 71527 26679 266 244323347670 103285 208 296 86 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202725 MLB MLESTL 2% 379336 77926 308210 143 231314323637 92286 228 292 84 -7 +2 +0 -2 +8 0.1
▸ 2027 — real world (MLB)
202725 MLB CTXSTL 2% 44 1000 010 00 231314320634 89287 250 291 84 -0 +0 +0 -0 +0 -0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202826 MLB MLESTL 31% 231204 47614 19506 82 232315330645 98286 228 295 86 -4 +1 +0 -1 +5 0.0
202927 MLB MLESTL 42% 263233 54715 21587 92 232314331645 99286 228 295 86 -5 +1 +0 -2 +6 0.1
203028 MLB MLESTL 48% 285253 58815 23637 92 230313330643 100285 228 293 85 -5 +1 -1 -2 +6 -0.0
203129 MLB MLESTL 49% 289257 59815 23657 72 229310328638 99284 228 291 83 -6 +1 -1 -2 +6 -0.2
203230 MLB MLESTL 50% 289258 58815 23666 62 227307324630 97283 238 288 81 -6 +0 -2 -2 +6 -0.4
202826 MLB CTXSTL 31% 7264 14201 6162 31 232315327642 95287 228 294 86 -1 +0 +0 -0 +2 0.0
202927 MLB CTXSTL 42% 11198 23312 9243 41 232314328642 96287 228 294 86 -2 +0 +0 -1 +2 0.0
203028 MLB CTXSTL 48% 136121 28412 11303 41 230313327640 97287 228 292 85 -2 +0 -0 -1 +3 -0.0
203129 MLB CTXSTL 49% 143127 29412 12323 41 229310325635 96285 228 290 83 -3 +0 -1 -1 +3 -0.1
203230 MLB CTXSTL 50% 145129 29412 12333 31 227307321628 94284 238 287 81 -3 +0 -1 -1 +3 -0.2
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 607539 1231749 5013514 185 228310325635 96286 228 291 84 -12 +2 -2 -4 +13 -0.3
/ 162G— A+C — 650577 13218410 5414515 195 229311326637 97286 228 291 84 -13 +2 -2 -4 +14 -0.3
Career— MLE — 23812102 492641037 19252368 8821 234318327645 93293 228 293 84 -30 +4 -4 -9 +34 -0.5
/ 162G— MLE — 650574 13417310 5214319 246 233318326644 92292 228 293 84 -12 +2 -2 -4 +14 -0.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AASpringfield Cardinals · 296 PAwOBA .348 → .300 (−48)K% 16.6% → 20.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA16.55%÷1.000×1.220——20.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.15%÷1.000×0.700—×0.9987.79%
HBP% /PA2.03%—×0.870—×0.9981.76%
Singles /BIP27.54%÷1.000×0.920×1.028×0.99825.98%
Doubles /BIP2.42%÷1.000×0.840×1.028×0.9982.08%
Triples /BIP0.97%÷1.000×0.940×1.028×0.9980.93%
Home runs /BIP3.86%÷1.000×0.800—×0.9983.09%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.028.

Result: wOBA .348 → .300; ISO .129 → .107; BABIP .320 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 APalm Beach Cardinals · 33 PAwOBA .328 → .256 (−71)K% 15.2% → 20.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA15.15%÷1.000×1.360——20.61%
BB% (unintentional) /PA12.12%÷1.000×0.690—×0.9708.11%
HBP% /PA9.09%—×0.780—×0.9706.88%
Singles /BIP14.29%÷1.000×0.920—×0.97012.75%
Doubles /BIP4.76%÷1.000×0.830—×0.9703.83%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.910—×0.9700.00%
Home runs /BIP4.76%÷1.000×0.800—×0.9703.70%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.0 → −3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .328 → .256; ISO .154 → .122; BABIP .200 → .172. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 A+Peoria Chiefs · 228 PAwOBA .335 → .273 (−62)K% 18.9% → 25.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA18.86%÷0.951×1.270——25.19%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.84%÷1.027×0.710—×0.9888.09%
HBP% /PA5.70%—×0.790—×0.9884.45%
Singles /BIP30.00%÷1.010×0.920×0.978×0.98826.39%
Doubles /BIP3.57%÷1.083×0.810×0.978×0.9882.58%
Triples /BIP0.71%÷0.926×0.850×0.978×0.9880.63%
Home runs /BIP0.71%÷0.857×0.800—×0.9880.66%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 71, 1B 102, 2B 117, 3B 85, K 90, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.

Result: wOBA .335 → .273; ISO .055 → .045; BABIP .333 → .288. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 APalm Beach Cardinals · 130 PAwOBA .393 → .336 (−57)K% 14.6% → 19.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA14.62%÷1.000×1.360——19.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA14.62%÷0.988×0.690—×0.98010.00%
HBP% /PA3.08%—×0.780—×0.9802.35%
Singles /BIP29.89%÷0.995×0.920×1.022×0.98027.68%
Doubles /BIP5.75%÷0.896×0.830×1.022×0.9805.33%
Triples /BIP1.15%÷0.900×0.910×1.022×0.9801.16%
Home runs /BIP2.30%÷0.973×0.800—×0.9801.85%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 99, 2B 79, 3B 80, K 100, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.

Result: wOBA .393 → .336; ISO .123 → .110; BABIP .376 → .348. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 APalm Beach Cardinals · 60 PAwOBA .353 → .255 (−98)K% 13.3% → 18.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA13.33%÷0.968×1.360——18.73%
BB% (unintentional) /PA5.00%÷0.999×0.690—×0.9903.42%
HBP% /PA1.67%—×0.780—×0.9901.29%
Singles /BIP22.92%÷1.040×0.920×0.950×0.99019.06%
Doubles /BIP14.58%÷1.153×0.830×0.950×0.9909.88%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.946×0.910×0.950×0.9900.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.036×0.800—×0.9900.00%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 108, 2B 131, 3B 89, K 94, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .353 → .255; ISO .125 → .081; BABIP .375 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 ROKFCL Cardinals · 22 PAwOBA .503 → .356 (−147)K% 13.6% → 19.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA13.64%÷1.018×1.440——19.29%
BB% (unintentional) /PA22.73%÷1.043×0.620—×0.96513.04%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.720—×0.9650.00%
Singles /BIP21.43%÷0.998×0.820—×0.96516.98%
Doubles /BIP28.57%÷1.016×0.720—×0.96519.55%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.935×0.720—×0.9650.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷0.975×0.780—×0.9650.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 100, 2B 103, 3B 87, K 104, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .503 → .356; ISO .235 → .171; BABIP .500 → .365. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .