Seth Stephenson
OF Erie SeaWolves| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | A+DET | 477 | .263/.350/.342 | 5 | 60 | 59 | — | .218/.293/.284 |
| 2025 | 24 | AA/A+DET | 508 | .281/.365/.410 | 8 | 49 | 79 | — | .242/.311/.352 |
| 2026 | 25 | AADET | 467 | .238/.308/.321 | 2 | 66 | 52 | — | .216/.273/.288 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 26 | MLBDET | 3 | .216/.275/.297 | 0 | 0 | 65 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ27% MLB | 27 | MLBDET | 45 | .216/.276/.300 | 0 | 3 | 66 | -0.1 |
Tools · ContractCON 55 / POW 40
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 33 | 30 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 233 | 303 | 233 | 536 | 318 | 24 | 3 | 258 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 68 | 57 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 298 | 412 | 404 | 815 | 105 | 447 | 28 | 7 | 375 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 437 | 368 | 102 | 17 | 8 | 4 | 37 | 89 | 24 | 62 | 13 | 277 | 380 | 399 | 779 | 122 | 351 | 20 | 8 | 349 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 477 | 415 | 109 | 12 | 3 | 5 | 37 | 85 | 19 | 60 | 9 | 263 | 350 | 342 | 692 | 80 | 318 | 18 | 8 | 317 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA | Erie SeaWolves | — | 81 | 71 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 254 | 329 | 352 | 681 | 99 | 290 | 12 | 7 | 303 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 427 | 371 | 106 | 16 | 5 | 8 | 30 | 62 | 21 | 42 | 5 | 286 | 372 | 420 | 793 | 135 | 325 | 15 | 7 | 354 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA | Erie SeaWolves | — | 467 | 421 | 100 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 29 | 90 | 14 | 66 | 7 | 238 | 308 | 321 | 628 | 83 | 297 | 19 | 6 | 288 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 33 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 200 | 273 | 200 | 473 | 295 | 33 | 3 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 68 | 58 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 259 | 368 | 345 | 712 | 86 | 405 | 35 | 6 | 298 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 437 | 381 | 90 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 24 | 124 | 24 | 62 | 13 | 236 | 322 | 331 | 652 | 94 | 319 | 28 | 5 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 477 | 426 | 93 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 26 | 113 | 19 | 60 | 9 | 218 | 293 | 284 | 577 | 66 | 276 | 24 | 5 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 81 | 73 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 247 | 304 | 329 | 633 | 82 | 283 | 15 | 5 | 280 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 427 | 382 | 92 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 19 | 82 | 21 | 42 | 5 | 241 | 313 | 356 | 669 | 115 | 279 | 19 | 4 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 467 | 431 | 93 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 110 | 14 | 66 | 7 | 216 | 273 | 288 | 561 | 72 | 279 | 24 | 4 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 33 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 200 | 273 | 200 | 473 | 316 | 33 | 3 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2022 | 21 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 33 | 30 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 233 | 303 | 233 | 536 | 318 | 24 | 3 | 258 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2023 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 505 | 440 | 105 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 27 | 148 | 30 | 70 | 15 | 239 | 326 | 332 | 658 | 93 | 348 | 29 | 5 | 282 | 77 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 505 | 425 | 119 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 42 | 108 | 30 | 70 | 15 | 280 | 384 | 400 | 784 | 120 | 363 | 21 | 8 | 353 | 77 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 477 | 426 | 93 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 26 | 113 | 19 | 60 | 9 | 218 | 293 | 284 | 577 | 66 | 286 | 24 | 5 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 477 | 415 | 109 | 12 | 3 | 5 | 37 | 85 | 19 | 60 | 9 | 263 | 350 | 342 | 692 | 80 | 318 | 18 | 8 | 317 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 508 | 454 | 110 | 18 | 5 | 7 | 24 | 94 | 23 | 49 | 6 | 242 | 313 | 350 | 664 | 108 | 290 | 19 | 5 | 286 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 508 | 442 | 124 | 21 | 6 | 8 | 36 | 72 | 23 | 49 | 6 | 281 | 365 | 410 | 775 | 129 | 319 | 14 | 7 | 346 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 467 | 431 | 93 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 110 | 14 | 66 | 7 | 216 | 273 | 288 | 561 | 72 | 284 | 24 | 4 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA RAW | Erie SeaWolves | — | 467 | 421 | 100 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 29 | 90 | 14 | 66 | 7 | 238 | 308 | 321 | 628 | 83 | 297 | 19 | 6 | 288 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 33 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 200 | 273 | 200 | 473 | 295 | 33 | 3 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2023 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 505 | 443 | 105 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 27 | 148 | 30 | 70 | 15 | 237 | 326 | 330 | 656 | 93 | 331 | 29 | 5 | 282 | 77 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 477 | 429 | 93 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 26 | 113 | 19 | 60 | 9 | 217 | 293 | 282 | 575 | 65 | 276 | 24 | 5 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 508 | 456 | 110 | 18 | 5 | 7 | 24 | 94 | 23 | 49 | 6 | 241 | 313 | 349 | 662 | 107 | 280 | 19 | 5 | 286 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 467 | 430 | 93 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 110 | 14 | 66 | 7 | 216 | 273 | 288 | 561 | 72 | 279 | 24 | 4 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 477 | 429 | 93 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 26 | 113 | 19 | 60 | 9 | 217 | 293 | 282 | 575 | 65 | 276 | 24 | 5 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 508 | 456 | 110 | 18 | 5 | 7 | 24 | 94 | 23 | 49 | 6 | 241 | 313 | 349 | 662 | 107 | 280 | 19 | 5 | 286 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 467 | 430 | 93 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 110 | 14 | 66 | 7 | 216 | 273 | 288 | 561 | 72 | 279 | 24 | 4 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 2% | 380 | 348 | 75 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 88 | 11 | 29 | 4 | 219 | 279 | 303 | 582 | 84 | 281 | 23 | 5 | 265 | 65 | -16 | +4 | +0 | -2 | +8 | -0.1 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 2% | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 216 | 275 | 297 | 573 | 81 | 277 | 33 | 0 | 261 | 65 | -0 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 27% | 167 | 152 | 34 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 39 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 220 | 280 | 306 | 585 | 86 | 281 | 23 | 5 | 266 | 66 | -7 | +2 | +0 | -1 | +4 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 27% | 45 | 42 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 216 | 276 | 300 | 576 | 84 | 277 | 22 | 4 | 262 | 66 | -2 | +1 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 45 | 42 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 214 | 267 | 262 | 529 | 48 | 281 | 22 | 4 | 262 | 66 | -2 | +1 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 607 | 130 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 144 | 14 | 43 | 0 | 214 | 266 | 262 | 528 | 48 | 281 | 22 | 4 | 262 | 66 | -26 | +9 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -0.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2312 | 2076 | 472 | 77 | 20 | 19 | 113 | 551 | 97 | 279 | 40 | 227 | 298 | 311 | 610 | 84 | 299 | 24 | 5 | 266 | 66 | -13 | +4 | +0 | -2 | +7 | -0.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 584 | 133 | 22 | 6 | 5 | 32 | 155 | 27 | 78 | 11 | 228 | 299 | 312 | 610 | 84 | 300 | 24 | 5 | 266 | 66 | -26 | +8 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -0.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAErie SeaWolves · 467 PAwOBA .281 → .245 (−36)K% 19.3% → 23.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.27% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 23.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.21% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.998 | 4.34% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.00% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.998 | 2.54% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.45% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | ×1.001 | ×0.998 | 20.78% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.55% | ÷1.000 | ×0.860 | ×1.001 | ×0.998 | 6.49% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.950 | ×1.001 | ×0.998 | 0.57% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.998 | 0.47% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.
Result: wOBA .281 → .245; ISO .083 → .070; BABIP .297 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 427 PAwOBA .346 → .287 (−59)K% 14.5% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.52% | ÷0.960 | ×1.270 | — | — | 19.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.03% | ÷1.106 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 4.46% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.92% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 3.84% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.92% | ÷1.027 | ×0.920 | ×0.978 | ×0.988 | 21.56% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.18% | ÷0.948 | ×0.810 | ×0.978 | ×0.988 | 4.27% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.62% | ÷0.900 | ×0.850 | ×0.978 | ×0.988 | 1.48% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.59% | ÷0.850 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 2.41% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 105, 2B 90, 3B 80, K 92, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.
Result: wOBA .346 → .287; ISO .135 → .121; BABIP .325 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAErie SeaWolves · 81 PAwOBA .299 → .280 (−19)K% 12.3% → 14.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.35% | ÷1.035 | ×1.220 | — | — | 14.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.41% | ÷0.996 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.012 | 5.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.47% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 2.12% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.67% | ÷0.981 | ×0.970 | ×1.036 | ×1.012 | 20.39% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.20% | ÷1.075 | ×0.860 | ×1.036 | ×1.012 | 6.87% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.64% | ÷1.115 | ×0.950 | ×1.036 | ×1.012 | 1.46% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.056 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 111, 1B 96, 2B 115, 3B 123, K 107, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.036.
Result: wOBA .299 → .280; ISO .099 → .087; BABIP .290 → .283. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 477 PAwOBA .310 → .255 (−55)K% 17.8% → 23.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.82% | ÷0.957 | ×1.270 | — | — | 23.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.76% | ÷1.026 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 5.36% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.98% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 3.14% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.97% | ÷1.021 | ×0.920 | ×0.965 | ×0.998 | 23.41% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.64% | ÷0.892 | ×0.810 | ×0.965 | ×0.998 | 3.18% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.91% | ÷0.900 | ×0.850 | ×0.965 | ×0.998 | 0.83% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.52% | ÷0.889 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 1.36% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 104, 2B 78, 3B 80, K 91, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.965.
Result: wOBA .310 → .255; ISO .080 → .070; BABIP .318 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 437 PAwOBA .344 → .279 (−65)K% 20.4% → 28.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.37% | ÷0.975 | ×1.360 | — | — | 28.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.47% | ÷1.089 | ×0.690 | — | — | 5.37% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.49% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 4.28% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.16% | ÷0.957 | ×0.920 | ×0.987 | — | 24.82% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.09% | ÷1.056 | ×0.830 | ×0.987 | — | 4.72% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.87% | ÷1.020 | ×0.910 | ×0.987 | — | 2.53% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.43% | ÷1.216 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.94% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 143, 1B 91, 2B 111, 3B 104, K 95, BB 118 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.987.
Result: wOBA .344 → .279; ISO .122 → .093; BABIP .351 → .319. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 68 PAwOBA .366 → .298 (−68)K% 27.9% → 35.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.94% | ÷1.007 | ×1.270 | — | — | 35.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.35% | ÷0.993 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 5.32% |
| HBP% /PA | 8.82% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 7.05% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.58% | ÷0.989 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.012 | 29.73% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.53% | ÷0.985 | ×0.810 | — | ×1.012 | 8.76% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.63% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 1.97% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.882 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 98, 2B 97, 3B 130, K 101, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .366 → .298; ISO .105 → .079; BABIP .447 → .405. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 33 PAwOBA .251 → .204 (−48)K% 24.2% → 33.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.24% | ÷0.982 | ×1.360 | — | — | 33.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.03% | ÷0.998 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 2.13% |
| HBP% /PA | 6.06% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 4.80% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.82% | ÷1.009 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.015 | 29.46% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.974 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.039 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.279 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 156, 1B 102, 2B 95, 3B 108, K 96, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .251 → .204; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .318 → .295. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).