Luis Arejula
P Hudson Valley Renegades| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 20 | ROKNYY | 8 | 2 | 17 | 3.24 | 3.46 | 22.2% | 5.6% | — | K 15.1% · BB 6.9% · FIP 4.71 | |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 14 | 0 | 16 | 4.96 | 2.86 | 21.8% | 12.8% | — | K 21.8% · BB 12.8% · FIP 2.88 | |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 33 | 0 | 55 | 2.96 | 3.56 | 20.9% | 11.9% | — | K 15.9% · BB 13.8% · FIP 4.38 | |
| 2025 | 23 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBNYY | — | — | 0 | 4.74 | 4.74 | 21.2% | 11.3% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 26 | MLBNYY | 12 | 0 | 13 | 4.68 | 4.67 | 21.7% | 11.0% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Yankees 2 | 12 | 10 | 44 | 186 | 60 | 13 | 3 | 83% | 3.7 | 21.9% | 8.7% | 13.2% | 2.1% | 4.30 | 3.52 | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Yankees 2 | 12 | 10 | 44 | 186 | 60 | 13 | 3 | 83% | 3.7 | 32.3% | 7.0% | 25.3% | 1.6% | 4.30 | 2.15 | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Yankees | 8 | 2 | 17 | 72 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 25% | 2.1 | 15.1% | 6.9% | 8.2% | 3.6% | 3.24 | 4.71 | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Yankees | 8 | 2 | 17 | 72 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 25% | 2.1 | 22.2% | 5.6% | 16.7% | 2.8% | 3.24 | 3.46 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 14 | 0 | 16 | 78 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 0% | 1.2 | 21.8% | 12.8% | 9.0% | 0.0% | 4.96 | 2.88 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 14 | 0 | 16 | 78 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 0% | 1.2 | 21.8% | 12.8% | 9.0% | 0.0% | 4.96 | 2.86 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 0 | 55 | 235 | 49 | 28 | 3 | 0% | 1.7 | 15.9% | 13.8% | 2.1% | 1.6% | 2.96 | 4.38 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 0 | 55 | 235 | 49 | 28 | 3 | 0% | 1.7 | 15.9% | 13.8% | 2.1% | 1.6% | 2.96 | 4.38 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 33 | 0 | 55 | 235 | 49 | 28 | 3 | 0% | 1.7 | 20.9% | 11.9% | 8.9% | 1.3% | 2.96 | 3.56 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | NYY | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.2% | 11.3% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 4.74 | 4.74 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | NYY | 29 | 0 | 30 | 129 | 28 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.7% | 11.0% | 10.6% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.67 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | NYY | 12 | 0 | 13 | 55 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.7% | 11.0% | 10.6% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.67 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 12 | 0 | 13 | 55 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.7% | 11.0% | 10.6% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.29 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 183 | 91 | 30 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.7% | 11.0% | 10.6% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.29 | +0.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 67 | 12 | 132 | 571 | 106 | 64 | 10 | 18% | 2.0 | 18.6% | 11.1% | 7.4% | 1.8% | 3.69 | 3.94 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 102 | 18 | 200 | 867 | 161 | 97 | 16 | 18% | 2.0 | 18.6% | 11.1% | 7.4% | 1.8% | 3.69 | 3.94 | -0.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 A+Hudson Valley Renegades · 40 IPFIP 3.42 → 4.21 (+0.80)K% 22.1% → 17.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.09% | — | ×0.770 | 17.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.21% | — | ×1.150 | 14.04% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.16% | ÷1.032 | ×1.250 | 1.41% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 3.42 → 4.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ATampa Tarpons · 14 IPFIP 3.90 → 4.83 (+0.92)K% 17.5% → 12.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.46% | — | ×0.740 | 12.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.11% | — | ×1.180 | 13.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.59% | ÷0.979 | ×1.300 | 2.11% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 3.90 → 4.83, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ATampa Tarpons · 10 IPFIP 3.10 → 3.81 (+0.71)K% 19.1% → 14.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.15% | — | ×0.740 | 14.17% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.77% | — | ×1.180 | 15.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.086 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 117).
Result: FIP 3.10 → 3.81, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Yankees · 6 IPFIP 2.56 → 3.66 (+1.11)K% 25.8% → 17.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.81% | — | ×0.680 | 17.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.90% | — | ×1.250 | 16.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.383 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 177).
Result: FIP 2.56 → 3.66, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Yankees · 17 IPFIP 3.45 → 4.71 (+1.25)K% 22.2% → 15.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.22% | — | ×0.680 | 15.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.56% | — | ×1.250 | 6.94% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.78% | ÷1.066 | ×1.400 | 3.65% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 113).
Result: FIP 3.45 → 4.71, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKDSL Yankees 2 · 44 IPFIP 2.15 → 3.52 (+1.37)K% 32.3% → 21.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.26% | — | ×0.680 | 21.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.99% | — | ×1.250 | 8.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.61% | ÷1.063 | ×1.400 | 2.12% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 113).
Result: FIP 2.15 → 3.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.3 | 34 | 21.4% | 11.2% | 1.15 | 4.71 |
| Yency Almonte ('24) | 1.1 | 45 | 22.5% | 9.9% | 1.13 | 4.44 |
| Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*) | 1.0 | 50 | 21.5%* | 11.9%* | 1.05* | 4.68* |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |
| Manny Acosta ('12) | 1.2 | 41 | 20.5% | 10.9% | 1.09 | 3.99 |
| Valerio De Los Santos ('08) | 1.3 | 51 | 18.7% | 11.5% | 1.30 | 4.57 |
| Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 40 | 20.0%* | 12.5%* | 0.98* | 4.96* |