Luis Viloria

P ACL Angels

Age 23 LHP 5'10" / 150 lbs ROK

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2022	18	ROKLAA	10	0	14	3.14	2.26	29.3%	5.2%	—	K 19.9% · BB 6.5% · FIP 3.64
2023	19	ROKLAA	5	2	18	3.06	2.99	20.8%	6.9%	—	K 14.2% · BB 8.7% · FIP 4.18
2024	20	MIX2 levels	30	0	39	6.46	3.15	32.1%	15.0%	—	K 22.6% · BB 18.3% · FIP 4.83
2027PROJ	23	MLBSEA	22	0	23	4.79	4.79	23.2%	12.9%	-0.1
2028PROJ43% MLB	24	MLBSEA	10	0	10	4.63	4.56	23.8%	11.6%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsBrendan Nail (age 23) · Seth Clark (age 23) · Brian Marconi (age 24)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 108116vR 124

ERA4.79

FIP4.79

K%23.2%

BB%12.9%

K-BB%10.4%

Proj IP23

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 23 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2021	17	ROK MLE	DSL Angels	15	0	30	127	41	10	1	0%	2.0	22.0%	9.8%	12.1%	1.2%	2.97	3.16	—
2021	17	ROK RAW	DSL Angels	15	0	30	127	41	10	1	0%	2.0	32.3%	7.9%	24.4%	0.8%	2.97	1.81	—
2022	18	ROK MLE	ACL Angels	10	0	14	58	17	3	1	0%	1.4	19.9%	6.5%	13.5%	2.6%	3.14	3.64	—
2022	18	ROK RAW	ACL Angels	10	0	14	58	17	3	1	0%	1.4	29.3%	5.2%	24.1%	1.7%	3.14	2.26	—
2023	19	ROK MLE	ACL Angels	5	2	18	72	15	5	1	40%	3.5	14.2%	8.7%	5.5%	2.1%	3.06	4.18	—
2023	19	ROK RAW	ACL Angels	5	2	18	72	15	5	1	40%	3.5	20.8%	6.9%	13.9%	1.4%	3.06	2.99	—
2024	20	MIX MLE	2 levels	30	0	39	193	62	29	3	0%	1.3	22.6%	18.3%	4.2%	2.4%	6.46	4.83	—
2024	20	MIX MLE	2 levels	30	0	39	193	62	29	3	0%	1.3	22.6%	18.3%	4.2%	2.4%	6.46	4.83	—
2024	20	MIX RAW	2 levels	30	0	39	193	62	29	3	0%	1.3	32.1%	15.0%	17.1%	1.6%	6.46	3.15	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	23	MLB	SEA	22	0	23	97	23	13	3	0%	1.0	23.2%	12.9%	10.4%	3.0%	4.79	4.79	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	24	MLB MLE	SEA	23	0	24	100	24	12	3	0%	1.0	23.8%	11.6%	12.2%	3.0%	4.63	4.56	-0.0
2028	24	MLB CTX	SEA	10	0	10	42	10	5	1	0%	1.0	23.8%	11.6%	12.2%	3.0%	4.63	4.56	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		10	0	10	43	10	5	1	0%	1.0	23.8%	11.6%	12.2%	3.0%	4.63	4.18	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	197	98	20	0%	1.1	23.8%	11.6%	12.2%	3.0%	4.63	4.18	+0.9
Career	—	MLE		60	2	101	450	93	58	9	3%	1.7	20.7%	12.9%	7.8%	2.0%	4.35	4.10	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		118	4	200	888	184	114	18	3%	1.7	20.7%	12.9%	7.8%	2.0%	4.35	4.10	-0.0

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Luis Viloria (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.79	23.2%	12.9%	3.0%	—	4.56	23.8%	12.2%	24	-0.23	—	—	—
Brendan Nail L 2019 · 4.88 FIP	23	SU	4.88	23.8%	16.4%	3.1%	.305	3.83	26.2%	15.2%	87	-1.05	3.45	165	87
Seth Clark L 2023 · 4.23 FIP	23	SU	4.23	22.5%	15.0%	2.1%	.287	5.23	18.4%	0.6%	82	+1.00	4.23	128	87
Brian Marconi L 2021 · 3.89 FIP	24	SU	3.89	25.3%	12.3%	2.5%	.265	5.02	20.3%	2.1%	57	+1.13	3.89	101	86
Keylan Killgore L 2019 · 4.23 FIP	22	SU	4.23	20.7%	12.7%	2.3%	.307	—	—	—	—	—	3.73	161	86
Fred Schlichtholz L 2019 · 4.23 FIP	23	SU	4.23	22.5%	12.8%	2.6%	.368	4.13	18.5%	8.4%	80	-0.10	3.49	175	86
Andrew Walling L 2023 · 4.20 FIP	23	SU	4.20	23.7%	14.8%	2.2%	.272	3.89	22.1%	8.8%	105	-0.31	3.14	161	85
Will Ohman L 2001 · 4.66 FIP	23	SU	4.66	22.2%	11.1%	3.7%	.353	—	—	—	—	—	2.88	350	85
Harry Gustin L 2024 · 3.91 FIP	22	SU	3.91	20.7%	11.0%	2.1%	.331	4.33	22.9%	12.7%	109	+0.42	3.70	152	85
Sean Mellen L 2021 · 4.59 FIP	23	SU	4.59	21.5%	12.1%	3.2%	.364	4.01	21.3%	10.9%	55	-0.58	4.01	101	84
Robert Garcia L 2019 · 4.35 FIP	23	SU	4.35	24.0%	11.4%	3.3%	.342	4.38	22.0%	10.4%	106	+0.03	2.21	471	84
Jared Tobey L 2019 · 3.99 FIP	23	SU	3.99	21.0%	12.1%	2.1%	.320	5.43	22.4%	8.2%	73	+1.44	3.99	158	84
Andrew Tomasovich L 2017 · 3.99 FIP	23	SU	3.99	21.1%	13.5%	1.8%	.333	4.04	20.3%	6.9%	52	+0.05	3.87	126	84
Wesley Moore L 2023 · 3.62 FIP	23	SU	3.62	25.9%	13.2%	1.9%	.254	4.18	18.3%	5.6%	58	+0.56	3.62	111	83
Hector Mercado L 2000 · 4.79 FIP	26	SU	4.79	21.7%	13.3%	3.3%	.270	4.22	22.9%	10.0%	111	-0.57	3.47	125	83
Mitchell Tyranski L 2023 · 5.14 FIP	25	SU	5.14	20.4%	13.6%	3.7%	.269	4.10	20.7%	6.1%	103	-1.04	3.46	145	83
Houston Harding L 2022 · 5.30 FIP	24	SU	5.30	20.2%	10.5%	4.7%	.307	4.87	17.3%	4.9%	158	-0.43	3.41	239	82
Taylor Tankersley L 2006 · 3.65 FIP	23	SU	3.65	25.8%	11.8%	2.2%	.271	4.62	21.6%	9.8%	65	+0.97	3.65	118	82
Nick Hagadone L 2012 · 4.74 FIP	26	SU	4.74	22.4%	12.9%	3.5%	.310	3.88	24.6%	14.7%	82	-0.86	2.97	141	82
Daniel Stumpf L 2015 · 4.31 FIP	24	SU	4.31	20.8%	11.5%	2.8%	.268	3.54	22.5%	15.3%	123	-0.77	1.84	238	82
Garrett Irvin L 2023 · 4.42 FIP	24	SU	4.42	23.2%	11.6%	3.3%	.283	4.32	17.7%	2.9%	39	-0.10	4.32	110	82