Wesley Moore
P Reading Fightin Phils| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 28 | 0 | 28 | 4.23 | 3.21 | 28.0% | 8.5% | — | K 22.0% · BB 9.4% · FIP 4.04 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 33 | 1 | 38 | 5.45 | 3.86 | 20.2% | 14.0% | — | K 15.0% · BB 15.7% · FIP 4.30 |
| 2026 | 26 | AAPHI | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9.00 | 7.10 | 16.7% | 33.3% | — | K 16.7% · BB 33.3% · FIP 5.91 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBPHI | — | — | 0 | 4.98 | 4.98 | 19.8% | 12.6% | — | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 28 | MLBPHI | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.96 | 5.00 | 20.0% | 12.4% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 53 | 230 | 79 | 26 | 3 | 0% | 1.3 | 25.9% | 13.2% | 12.8% | 1.9% | 1.35 | 3.62 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 53 | 230 | 79 | 26 | 3 | 0% | 1.3 | 34.3% | 11.3% | 23.0% | 1.3% | 1.35 | 2.33 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 0 | 28 | 118 | 33 | 10 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.0% | 9.4% | 12.6% | 2.9% | 4.23 | 4.04 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 0 | 28 | 118 | 33 | 10 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.0% | 9.4% | 12.6% | 2.9% | 4.23 | 4.04 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 28 | 0 | 28 | 118 | 33 | 10 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 28.0% | 8.5% | 19.5% | 2.5% | 4.23 | 3.21 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 1 | 38 | 178 | 36 | 25 | 2 | 3% | 1.2 | 15.0% | 15.7% | -0.8% | 0.9% | 5.45 | 4.30 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 1 | 38 | 178 | 36 | 25 | 2 | 3% | 1.2 | 15.0% | 15.7% | -0.8% | 0.9% | 5.45 | 4.30 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 33 | 1 | 38 | 178 | 36 | 25 | 2 | 3% | 1.2 | 20.2% | 14.0% | 6.2% | 1.1% | 5.45 | 3.86 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA MLE | Reading Fightin Phils | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 16.7% | 33.3% | -16.7% | 0.0% | 9.00 | 5.91 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA MLE | Reading Fightin Phils | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 16.7% | 33.3% | -16.7% | 0.0% | 9.00 | 5.91 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA RAW | Reading Fightin Phils | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 16.7% | 33.3% | -16.7% | 0.0% | 9.00 | 7.10 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | PHI | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.8% | 12.6% | 7.3% | 2.9% | 4.98 | 4.98 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | PHI | 15 | 0 | 16 | 67 | 13 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.0% | 12.4% | 7.7% | 3.0% | 4.96 | 5.00 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | PHI | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.0% | 12.4% | 7.7% | 3.0% | 4.96 | 5.00 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.0% | 12.4% | 7.7% | 3.0% | 4.96 | 4.62 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 167 | 100 | 33 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.0% | 12.4% | 7.7% | 3.0% | 4.96 | 4.62 | -0.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 104 | 1 | 120 | 532 | 113 | 71 | 9 | 1% | 1.2 | 21.3% | 13.4% | 7.9% | 1.8% | 3.38 | 3.97 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 173 | 2 | 200 | 887 | 189 | 119 | 16 | 1% | 1.2 | 21.3% | 13.4% | 7.9% | 1.8% | 3.38 | 3.97 | -1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 30 IPFIP 3.59 → 4.30 (+0.71)K% 19.4% → 15.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.42% | — | ×0.770 | 14.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.67% | — | ×1.150 | 15.72% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.72% | ÷1.045 | ×1.250 | 0.86% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 3.59 → 4.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAReading Fightin Phils · 8 IPFIP 4.51 → 5.29 (+0.79)K% 23.1% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.08% | — | ×0.810 | 18.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.38% | — | ×1.100 | 16.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.56% | ÷1.036 | ×1.200 | 2.97% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 4.51 → 5.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAReading Fightin Phils · 14 IPFIP 4.20 → 4.80 (+0.60)K% 23.1% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.08% | — | ×0.810 | 18.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.77% | — | ×1.100 | 11.85% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.08% | ÷1.137 | ×1.200 | 3.25% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 127).
Result: FIP 4.20 → 4.80, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 13 IPFIP 1.98 → 3.11 (+1.13)K% 34.0% → 26.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.96% | — | ×0.770 | 26.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.66% | — | ×1.150 | 6.51% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.89% | ÷0.926 | ×1.250 | 2.55% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 1.98 → 3.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 28 IPFIP 3.13 → 4.61 (+1.47)K% 32.8% → 25.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.79% | — | ×0.770 | 25.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.48% | — | ×1.150 | 13.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.46% | ÷0.858 | ×1.250 | 3.58% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 72).
Result: FIP 3.13 → 4.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AClearwater Threshers · 25 IPFIP 1.46 → 2.50 (+1.05)K% 36.1% → 26.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.11% | — | ×0.740 | 26.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.11% | — | ×1.180 | 13.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.46 → 2.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).