Garrett Irvin
P Lansing Lugnuts| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 32 | 0 | 72 | 2.89 | 3.06 | 31.0% | 10.1% | — | K 23.2% · BB 11.6% · FIP 4.42 | |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 38 | 0 | 43 | 5.82 | 3.75 | 22.7% | 13.3% | — | K 17.7% · BB 14.8% · FIP 4.32 | |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 7 | 0 | 7 | 10.80 | 2.35 | 27.0% | 13.5% | — | K 27.0% · BB 13.5% · FIP 2.53 | |
| 2026 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBOAK | — | — | 0 | 4.70 | 4.70 | 21.9% | 11.4% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 29 | MLBOAK | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.74 | 4.80 | 21.8% | 11.4% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 9 | 1 | 12 | 48 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 11% | 1.3 | 37.5% | 8.3% | 29.2% | 0.0% | 1.50 | 0.99 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 9 | 1 | 12 | 48 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 11% | 1.3 | 37.5% | 8.3% | 29.2% | 0.0% | 1.50 | 1.10 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 32 | 0 | 72 | 297 | 92 | 30 | 7 | 0% | 2.2 | 23.2% | 11.6% | 11.5% | 3.3% | 2.89 | 4.42 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 32 | 0 | 72 | 297 | 92 | 30 | 7 | 0% | 2.2 | 31.0% | 10.1% | 20.9% | 2.4% | 2.89 | 3.06 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 38 | 0 | 43 | 203 | 46 | 27 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.7% | 14.8% | 2.9% | 1.5% | 5.82 | 4.32 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 38 | 0 | 43 | 203 | 46 | 27 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.7% | 14.8% | 2.9% | 1.5% | 5.82 | 4.32 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 38 | 0 | 43 | 203 | 46 | 27 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.7% | 13.3% | 9.4% | 1.5% | 5.82 | 3.75 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 7 | 0 | 7 | 37 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 27.0% | 13.5% | 13.5% | 0.0% | 10.80 | 2.53 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 7 | 0 | 7 | 37 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 27.0% | 13.5% | 13.5% | 0.0% | 10.80 | 2.53 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 7 | 0 | 7 | 37 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 27.0% | 13.5% | 13.5% | 0.0% | 10.80 | 2.35 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | OAK | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.9% | 11.4% | 10.4% | 3.0% | 4.70 | 4.70 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | OAK | 18 | 0 | 19 | 79 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.8% | 11.4% | 10.4% | 3.1% | 4.74 | 4.80 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | OAK | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.8% | 11.4% | 10.4% | 3.1% | 4.74 | 4.80 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.8% | 11.4% | 10.4% | 3.1% | 4.74 | 4.42 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 176 | 105 | 35 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.8% | 11.4% | 10.4% | 3.1% | 4.74 | 4.42 | +0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 86 | 1 | 134 | 585 | 133 | 74 | 13 | 1% | 1.6 | 22.7% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 2.2% | 4.11 | 3.98 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 129 | 1 | 200 | 875 | 199 | 110 | 19 | 1% | 1.6 | 22.7% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 2.2% | 4.11 | 3.98 | -0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 4 IPFIP 2.73 → 3.65 (+0.92)K% 30.4% → 23.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.43% | — | ×0.770 | 23.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.39% | — | ×1.150 | 20.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.921 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 2.73 → 3.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 39 IPFIP 3.37 → 4.32 (+0.95)K% 23.0% → 17.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.99% | — | ×0.770 | 17.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.83% | — | ×1.150 | 14.76% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.07% | ÷0.867 | ×1.250 | 1.54% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 73).
Result: FIP 3.37 → 4.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AStockton Ports · 71 IPFIP 3.01 → 4.42 (+1.40)K% 31.3% → 23.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.29% | — | ×0.740 | 23.16% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.86% | — | ×1.180 | 11.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.38% | ÷0.945 | ×1.300 | 3.28% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).
Result: FIP 3.01 → 4.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AStockton Ports · 8 IPFIP 0.92 → 2.00 (+1.07)K% 39.4% → 29.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 39.39% | — | ×0.740 | 29.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×1.180 | 10.73% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.003 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 0.92 → 2.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).