Davis Diaz
C Midland RockHounds| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | AOAK | 68 | .226/.397/.283 | 0 | 0 | 69 | — | .200/.353/.255 |
| 2025 | 22 | A+/AOAK | 432 | .231/.347/.311 | 2 | 8 | 49 | — | .189/.274/.252 |
| 2026 | 23 | AAA/AA/A+/INTL2 orgs | 466 | .280/.386/.414 | 10 | 15 | 97 | — | .245/.323/.343 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBOAK | 4 | .225/.304/.326 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ28% MLB | 25 | MLBOAK | 74 | .228/.307/.337 | 1 | 1 | 80 | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 26 | MLBOAK | 132 | .230/.308/.342 | 2 | 2 | 81 | 0.2 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 68 | 53 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 226 | 397 | 283 | 680 | 57 | 273 | 13 | 12 | 334 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 242 | 211 | 46 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 28 | 38 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 218 | 312 | 280 | 592 | 62 | 254 | 16 | 12 | 276 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 190 | 152 | 38 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 29 | 28 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 250 | 390 | 355 | 746 | 105 | 299 | 15 | 15 | 342 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AAA | Las Vegas Aviators | — | 81 | 74 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 216 | 284 | 311 | 595 | 95 | 269 | 25 | 9 | 273 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA | Midland RockHounds | — | 217 | 185 | 54 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 33 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 292 | 394 | 411 | 804 | 119 | 336 | 15 | 11 | 365 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 127 | 106 | 32 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 302 | 417 | 491 | 908 | 189 | 333 | 13 | 15 | 405 | 109 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | INTL | Mesa Solar Sox | — | 41 | 31 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 290 | 450 | 419 | 869 | 129 | 364 | 22 | 22 | 390 | 150 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 68 | 55 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 353 | 255 | 607 | 55 | 244 | 18 | 9 | 270 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 242 | 220 | 38 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 50 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 173 | 242 | 223 | 464 | 50 | 209 | 21 | 8 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 190 | 162 | 34 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 38 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 210 | 316 | 290 | 606 | 80 | 261 | 20 | 10 | 277 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AAA MLE | Las Vegas Aviators | — | 81 | 76 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 184 | 235 | 237 | 471 | 53 | 261 | 30 | 6 | 225 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | Midland RockHounds | — | 217 | 192 | 51 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 40 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 266 | 347 | 359 | 707 | 94 | 318 | 18 | 8 | 318 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 127 | 112 | 28 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 250 | 339 | 384 | 723 | 134 | 296 | 16 | 10 | 330 | 109 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 68 | 55 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 353 | 255 | 607 | 55 | 256 | 18 | 9 | 270 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A RAW | Stockton Ports | — | 68 | 53 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 226 | 397 | 283 | 680 | 57 | 273 | 13 | 12 | 334 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 432 | 382 | 72 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 38 | 87 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 188 | 274 | 249 | 523 | 60 | 235 | 20 | 9 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 432 | 363 | 84 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 57 | 66 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 231 | 347 | 311 | 658 | 80 | 273 | 15 | 13 | 305 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | 4 teams | — | 466 | 416 | 104 | 19 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 93 | 9 | 15 | 3 | 250 | 328 | 358 | 686 | 108 | 303 | 20 | 8 | 304 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA RAW | 4 teams | — | 466 | 396 | 111 | 21 | 1 | 10 | 59 | 78 | 9 | 15 | 3 | 280 | 386 | 414 | 800 | 134 | 326 | 17 | 13 | 362 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 68 | 55 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 353 | 255 | 607 | 55 | 244 | 18 | 9 | 270 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 432 | 384 | 72 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 38 | 87 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 188 | 274 | 247 | 521 | 60 | 232 | 20 | 9 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | 4 teams | — | 466 | 415 | 104 | 19 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 93 | 9 | 15 | 3 | 251 | 328 | 359 | 687 | 108 | 301 | 20 | 8 | 304 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 68 | 55 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 353 | 255 | 607 | 55 | 244 | 18 | 9 | 270 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 432 | 384 | 72 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 38 | 87 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 188 | 274 | 247 | 521 | 60 | 232 | 20 | 9 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | 4 teams | — | 466 | 415 | 104 | 19 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 93 | 9 | 15 | 3 | 251 | 328 | 359 | 687 | 108 | 301 | 20 | 8 | 304 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | OAK | 2% | 380 | 339 | 75 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 32 | 92 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 219 | 298 | 316 | 614 | 97 | 281 | 24 | 8 | 281 | 76 | -11 | +1 | +0 | +7 | +8 | 0.4 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB CTX | OAK | 2% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 225 | 304 | 326 | 630 | 101 | 290 | 25 | 0 | 287 | 76 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | OAK | 28% | 259 | 231 | 52 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 62 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 222 | 301 | 326 | 628 | 105 | 282 | 24 | 8 | 286 | 80 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +5 | +6 | 0.5 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | OAK | 44% | 303 | 269 | 60 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 73 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 223 | 303 | 332 | 635 | 109 | 282 | 24 | 9 | 289 | 81 | -7 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +7 | 0.6 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | OAK | 50% | 320 | 285 | 64 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 27 | 77 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 223 | 303 | 333 | 636 | 110 | 282 | 24 | 8 | 289 | 82 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +6 | +7 | 0.6 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | OAK | 55% | 326 | 290 | 65 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 28 | 79 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 223 | 301 | 332 | 634 | 110 | 282 | 24 | 9 | 288 | 81 | -7 | +0 | -0 | +6 | +7 | 0.6 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | OAK | 56% | 321 | 286 | 64 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 27 | 78 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 221 | 299 | 330 | 629 | 109 | 281 | 24 | 8 | 286 | 80 | -8 | +0 | -1 | +6 | +7 | 0.4 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | OAK | 56% | 314 | 280 | 61 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 77 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 218 | 296 | 322 | 618 | 104 | 279 | 25 | 9 | 281 | 77 | -9 | +0 | -2 | +6 | +7 | 0.2 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB MLE | OAK | 57% | 283 | 253 | 55 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 24 | 71 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 214 | 291 | 312 | 603 | 98 | 276 | 25 | 8 | 275 | 72 | -9 | -1 | -3 | +5 | +6 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | OAK | 28% | 74 | 67 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 228 | 307 | 337 | 644 | 109 | 291 | 24 | 8 | 292 | 80 | -2 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +2 | 0.1 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | OAK | 44% | 132 | 118 | 26 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 230 | 308 | 342 | 651 | 113 | 291 | 24 | 8 | 295 | 81 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +3 | 0.2 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | OAK | 50% | 161 | 144 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 230 | 308 | 343 | 652 | 114 | 291 | 24 | 9 | 295 | 82 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +3 | 0.3 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | OAK | 55% | 178 | 158 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 43 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 229 | 307 | 342 | 649 | 114 | 291 | 24 | 8 | 294 | 81 | -4 | +0 | -0 | +3 | +4 | 0.3 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | OAK | 56% | 178 | 158 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 43 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 227 | 305 | 340 | 645 | 112 | 290 | 24 | 8 | 292 | 80 | -4 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +4 | 0.2 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | OAK | 56% | 176 | 157 | 35 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 43 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 224 | 301 | 332 | 633 | 107 | 288 | 24 | 9 | 287 | 77 | -5 | -0 | -1 | +3 | +4 | 0.1 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB CTX | OAK | 57% | 160 | 144 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 220 | 296 | 321 | 618 | 102 | 284 | 25 | 8 | 281 | 72 | -5 | -1 | -1 | +3 | +3 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1059 | 946 | 212 | 42 | 3 | 17 | 89 | 258 | 15 | 11 | 7 | 224 | 301 | 329 | 630 | 105 | 288 | 24 | 8 | 291 | 76 | -27 | -1 | -3 | +19 | +23 | 1.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 581 | 130 | 26 | 2 | 10 | 55 | 158 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 224 | 301 | 327 | 628 | 103 | 288 | 24 | 8 | 291 | 76 | -16 | -0 | -2 | +12 | +14 | 0.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3302 | 2934 | 650 | 121 | 11 | 50 | 282 | 760 | 58 | 50 | 17 | 222 | 302 | 321 | 624 | 100 | 280 | 23 | 9 | 281 | 76 | -59 | +1 | -5 | +42 | +51 | 3.0 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 578 | 128 | 24 | 2 | 10 | 56 | 150 | 11 | 10 | 3 | 221 | 303 | 322 | 625 | 100 | 280 | 23 | 9 | 281 | 76 | -16 | +0 | -1 | +12 | +14 | 0.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAMidland RockHounds · 217 PAwOBA .358 → .318 (−40)K% 15.2% → 18.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.21% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 18.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.06% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.027 | 7.95% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.23% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×1.027 | 2.88% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.97% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.022 | ×1.027 | 26.04% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.022 | ×1.027 | 4.64% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.66% | ÷1.000 | ×0.940 | ×1.022 | ×1.027 | 0.65% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 2.16% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.
Result: wOBA .358 → .318; ISO .119 → .103; BABIP .336 → .318. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 127 PAwOBA .394 → .330 (−64)K% 12.6% → 16.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.60% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 16.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.96% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 10.60% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.57% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 1.24% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.021 | ×0.998 | 18.76% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.22% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.021 | ×0.998 | 10.09% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.021 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 2.66% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.021.
Result: wOBA .394 → .330; ISO .189 → .156; BABIP .333 → .296. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 81 PAwOBA .266 → .225 (−40)K% 24.7% → 29.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.69% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | — | — | 29.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.64% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 6.26% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.07% | ÷1.000 | ×0.930 | ×1.011 | ×1.050 | 23.76% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.85% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.011 | ×1.050 | 1.63% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | ×1.011 | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.050 | 2.72% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.011.
Result: wOBA .266 → .225; ISO .095 → .069; BABIP .269 → .261. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 242 PAwOBA .272 → .211 (−61)K% 15.7% → 20.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.70% | ÷0.969 | ×1.270 | — | — | 20.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.57% | ÷1.048 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 7.94% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.41% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 0.33% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.39% | ÷1.078 | ×0.920 | ×0.983 | ×1.012 | 18.16% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.05% | ÷1.199 | ×0.810 | ×0.983 | ×1.012 | 2.72% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×0.983 | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.16% | ÷0.921 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 1.02% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 116, 2B 140, 3B 130, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.983.
Result: wOBA .272 → .211; ISO .062 → .047; BABIP .254 → .209. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AStockton Ports · 190 PAwOBA .340 → .277 (−63)K% 14.7% → 19.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.74% | ÷1.011 | ×1.360 | — | — | 19.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.26% | ÷1.029 | ×0.690 | — | — | 10.23% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.16% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 2.46% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.16% | ÷1.003 | ×0.920 | ×0.985 | — | 18.21% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.06% | ÷0.990 | ×0.830 | ×0.985 | — | 6.66% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.42% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×0.985 | — | 1.89% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.113 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 101, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 102, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.985.
Result: wOBA .340 → .277; ISO .105 → .088; BABIP .299 → .261. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AStockton Ports · 68 PAwOBA .327 → .270 (−57)K% 13.2% → 17.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 13.24% | ÷1.015 | ×1.360 | — | — | 17.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.76% | ÷1.021 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 8.07% |
| HBP% /PA | 10.29% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 8.15% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.45% | ÷1.004 | ×0.920 | ×0.979 | ×1.015 | 18.63% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.82% | ÷0.979 | ×0.830 | ×0.979 | ×1.015 | 5.74% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×0.979 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.164 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 133, 1B 101, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 103, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.979.
Result: wOBA .327 → .270; ISO .057 → .049; BABIP .273 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .