Jonny McGill
OF Rancho Cucamonga Quakes| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 24 | A+/ALAA | 344 | .277/.416/.417 | 7 | 20 | 89 | — | .233/.337/.344 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 25 | MLBLAA | 380 | .213/.306/.326 | 7 | 8 | 81 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 26 | MLBLAA | 62 | .214/.305/.329 | 1 | 1 | 83 | -0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ42% MLB | 27 | MLBLAA | 101 | .214/.305/.330 | 2 | 2 | 83 | -0.0 |
Tools · ContractCON 43 / POW 39
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 24 | A+ | Tri-City Dust Devils | — | 53 | 46 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 239 | 340 | 413 | 753 | 174 | 303 | 23 | 11 | 338 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 291 | 232 | 66 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 52 | 53 | 7 | 19 | 6 | 284 | 430 | 418 | 848 | 134 | 347 | 18 | 18 | 389 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | Tri-City Dust Devils | — | 53 | 48 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 188 | 264 | 333 | 597 | 146 | 261 | 30 | 8 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 291 | 249 | 60 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 35 | 72 | 7 | 19 | 6 | 241 | 351 | 345 | 696 | 104 | 315 | 25 | 12 | 308 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 344 | 297 | 69 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 39 | 88 | 8 | 20 | 6 | 232 | 337 | 337 | 674 | 104 | 314 | 26 | 11 | 300 | 89 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 344 | 278 | 77 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 58 | 65 | 8 | 20 | 6 | 277 | 416 | 417 | 833 | 140 | 340 | 19 | 17 | 381 | 89 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 344 | 294 | 69 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 39 | 88 | 8 | 20 | 6 | 235 | 337 | 340 | 677 | 105 | 307 | 26 | 11 | 300 | 89 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 344 | 294 | 69 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 39 | 88 | 8 | 20 | 6 | 235 | 337 | 340 | 677 | 105 | 307 | 26 | 11 | 300 | 89 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB MLE | LAA | 0% | 380 | 332 | 71 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 40 | 102 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 213 | 306 | 326 | 631 | 113 | 283 | 27 | 11 | 288 | 81 | -8 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +8 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | LAA | 30% | 206 | 180 | 39 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 55 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 215 | 306 | 330 | 637 | 116 | 283 | 27 | 10 | 290 | 83 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +4 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | LAA | 42% | 244 | 214 | 46 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 25 | 65 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 215 | 306 | 332 | 638 | 116 | 283 | 27 | 10 | 291 | 83 | -5 | +1 | +0 | -1 | +5 | -0.1 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | LAA | 48% | 272 | 239 | 50 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 72 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 215 | 305 | 331 | 636 | 116 | 282 | 26 | 10 | 290 | 82 | -6 | +0 | -1 | -2 | +6 | -0.2 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | LAA | 49% | 280 | 247 | 52 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 74 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 214 | 303 | 328 | 631 | 114 | 281 | 26 | 10 | 288 | 81 | -6 | +0 | -1 | -2 | +6 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | LAA | 30% | 62 | 55 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 214 | 305 | 329 | 634 | 115 | 281 | 26 | 10 | 289 | 83 | -1 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | LAA | 42% | 101 | 89 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 27 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 214 | 305 | 330 | 635 | 116 | 280 | 27 | 10 | 289 | 83 | -2 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +2 | -0.0 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | LAA | 48% | 129 | 113 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 34 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 214 | 304 | 329 | 633 | 115 | 280 | 26 | 10 | 288 | 82 | -3 | +0 | -0 | -1 | +3 | -0.1 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | LAA | 49% | 138 | 121 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 37 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 213 | 302 | 327 | 628 | 114 | 279 | 27 | 10 | 286 | 81 | -3 | +0 | -1 | -1 | +3 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 430 | 378 | 81 | 14 | 3 | 8 | 43 | 114 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 214 | 304 | 331 | 635 | 116 | 282 | 27 | 10 | 288 | 84 | -9 | +0 | -1 | -3 | +9 | -0.3 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 571 | 123 | 21 | 5 | 12 | 65 | 172 | 9 | 11 | 5 | 215 | 305 | 333 | 638 | 117 | 283 | 26 | 10 | 288 | 84 | -14 | +0 | -2 | -4 | +14 | -0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1528 | 1336 | 290 | 52 | 7 | 27 | 160 | 403 | 22 | 43 | 13 | 217 | 311 | 327 | 638 | 110 | 289 | 26 | 10 | 292 | 84 | -25 | +2 | -2 | -7 | +26 | -0.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 568 | 123 | 22 | 3 | 11 | 68 | 171 | 9 | 18 | 6 | 217 | 310 | 324 | 634 | 107 | 289 | 26 | 10 | 292 | 84 | -14 | +1 | -1 | -4 | +14 | -0.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 291 PAwOBA .379 → .308 (−70)K% 18.2% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.21% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 24.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.53% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 11.85% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.41% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 1.84% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.82% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.033 | ×0.980 | 24.98% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.15% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.033 | ×0.980 | 5.17% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.56% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.033 | ×0.980 | 0.51% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.35% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 2.63% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.033.
Result: wOBA .379 → .308; ISO .134 → .109; BABIP .347 → .315. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Tri-City Dust Devils · 53 PAwOBA .329 → .255 (−74)K% 22.6% → 30.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.64% | ÷1.000 | ×1.350 | — | — | 30.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.32% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 7.94% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.89% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 1.51% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.65% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | — | ×0.988 | 15.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.82% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 7.24% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.94% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.988 | 2.38% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.94% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 2.41% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .329 → .255; ISO .174 → .133; BABIP .303 → .261. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).