Wyatt Olds
P Worcester Red Sox| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 43 | 1 | 78 | 6.09 | 3.92 | 29.7% | 15.0% | — | K 24.5% · BB 15.1% · FIP 4.49 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 42 | 0 | 71 | 5.05 | 5.01 | 23.9% | 15.2% | — | K 20.3% · BB 14.3% · FIP 5.28 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 53 | 0 | 66 | 4.34 | 3.66 | 31.9% | 12.2% | 0.7 | K 28.4% · BB 11.3% · FIP 3.95 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBBOS | 87 | 0 | 91 | 4.68 | 4.89 | 25.8% | 14.4% | -0.4 | |
| 2028PROJ79% MLB | 28 | MLBBOS | 78 | 0 | 82 | 4.80 | 4.91 | 25.3% | 13.9% | -0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ84% MLB | 29 | MLBBOS | 70 | 0 | 74 | 4.92 | 5.02 | 24.5% | 13.7% | -0.4 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 6 | 3 | 12 | 55 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 50% | 2.0 | 29.6% | 14.2% | 15.4% | 0.0% | 2.25 | 2.39 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 6 | 3 | 12 | 55 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 50% | 2.0 | 38.2% | 12.7% | 25.5% | 0.0% | 2.25 | 1.35 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 26 | 111 | 521 | 133 | 64 | 9 | 96% | 4.1 | 20.0% | 13.5% | 6.4% | 2.3% | 5.92 | 4.37 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 27 | 26 | 111 | 521 | 133 | 64 | 9 | 96% | 4.1 | 25.5% | 12.3% | 13.2% | 1.7% | 5.92 | 3.49 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 12 | 66 | 323 | 75 | 52 | 5 | 43% | 2.3 | 18.0% | 17.9% | 0.0% | 1.9% | 7.54 | 4.88 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 28 | 12 | 66 | 323 | 75 | 52 | 5 | 43% | 2.3 | 23.2% | 16.1% | 7.1% | 1.5% | 7.54 | 4.18 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 1 | 78 | 367 | 109 | 55 | 9 | 2% | 1.8 | 24.5% | 15.1% | 9.4% | 2.8% | 6.09 | 4.49 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 1 | 78 | 367 | 109 | 55 | 9 | 2% | 1.8 | 24.5% | 15.1% | 9.4% | 2.8% | 6.09 | 4.49 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 43 | 1 | 78 | 367 | 109 | 55 | 9 | 2% | 1.8 | 29.7% | 15.0% | 14.7% | 2.5% | 6.09 | 3.92 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 71 | 322 | 77 | 49 | 11 | 0% | 1.7 | 20.3% | 14.3% | 6.0% | 3.8% | 5.05 | 5.28 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 71 | 322 | 77 | 49 | 11 | 0% | 1.7 | 20.3% | 14.3% | 6.0% | 3.8% | 5.05 | 5.28 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 71 | 322 | 77 | 49 | 11 | 0% | 1.7 | 23.9% | 15.2% | 8.7% | 3.4% | 5.05 | 5.01 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 53 | 0 | 66 | 295 | 94 | 36 | 9 | 0% | 1.3 | 28.4% | 11.3% | 17.1% | 3.3% | 4.34 | 3.95 | +0.5 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 53 | 0 | 66 | 295 | 94 | 36 | 9 | 0% | 1.3 | 28.4% | 11.3% | 17.1% | 3.3% | 4.34 | 3.95 | +0.5 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 53 | 0 | 66 | 295 | 94 | 36 | 9 | 0% | 1.3 | 31.9% | 12.2% | 19.7% | 3.1% | 4.34 | 3.66 | +0.7 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 14 | 0 | 16 | 68 | 20 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 29.4% | 11.8% | 17.6% | 2.9% | 1.15 | 3.74 | +0.2 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | BOS | 87 | 0 | 91 | 384 | 99 | 55 | 12 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.8% | 14.4% | 11.4% | 3.2% | 4.68 | 4.89 | -0.4 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | BOS | 98 | 0 | 103 | 435 | 110 | 60 | 14 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.3% | 13.9% | 11.4% | 3.3% | 4.80 | 4.91 | -0.4 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | BOS | 84 | 0 | 88 | 371 | 91 | 51 | 13 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.5% | 13.7% | 10.8% | 3.4% | 4.92 | 5.02 | -0.5 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB MLE | BOS | 73 | 0 | 77 | 324 | 77 | 44 | 12 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.6% | 13.7% | 10.0% | 3.6% | 5.07 | 5.19 | -0.6 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | BOS | 78 | 0 | 82 | 346 | 88 | 48 | 11 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.3% | 13.9% | 11.4% | 3.3% | 4.80 | 4.91 | -0.3 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | BOS | 70 | 0 | 74 | 312 | 76 | 43 | 11 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.5% | 13.7% | 10.8% | 3.4% | 4.92 | 5.02 | -0.4 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB CTX | BOS | 64 | 0 | 67 | 283 | 67 | 39 | 10 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.6% | 13.7% | 10.0% | 3.6% | 5.07 | 5.19 | -0.5 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 226 | 0 | 239 | 1010 | 251 | 137 | 34 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.9% | 13.6% | 11.3% | 3.4% | 4.67 | 4.59 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 846 | 210 | 115 | 28 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.9% | 13.6% | 11.3% | 3.4% | 4.67 | 4.59 | -0.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 199 | 42 | 405 | 1883 | 417 | 271 | 50 | 21% | 2.0 | 22.2% | 14.4% | 7.8% | 2.7% | 5.69 | 4.51 | -1.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 98 | 21 | 200 | 931 | 206 | 134 | 25 | 21% | 2.0 | 22.2% | 14.4% | 7.8% | 2.7% | 5.69 | 4.51 | -0.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAWorcester Red Sox · 51 IPFIP 3.60 → 4.00 (+0.40)K% 32.6% → 28.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.60% | — | ×0.860 | 28.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.33% | — | ×0.900 | 11.10% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.08% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 3.39% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.60 → 4.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAWorcester Red Sox · 53 IPFIP 5.18 → 5.51 (+0.33)K% 25.0% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.860 | 21.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.53% | — | ×0.900 | 14.87% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.81% | ÷0.984 | ×1.100 | 4.26% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 5.18 → 5.51, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 18 IPFIP 4.08 → 4.66 (+0.58)K% 20.9% → 17.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.93% | — | ×0.810 | 16.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.63% | — | ×1.100 | 12.79% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.33% | ÷1.119 | ×1.200 | 2.49% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 124).
Result: FIP 4.08 → 4.66, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 54 IPFIP 3.22 → 4.07 (+0.85)K% 30.5% → 24.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.45% | — | ×0.810 | 24.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.35% | — | ×1.100 | 13.58% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.06% | ÷1.018 | ×1.200 | 2.43% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).
Result: FIP 3.22 → 4.07, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAWorcester Red Sox · 25 IPFIP 5.04 → 5.30 (+0.26)K% 28.2% → 24.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.23% | — | ×0.860 | 24.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.16% | — | ×0.900 | 18.15% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.23% | ÷0.996 | ×1.100 | 3.56% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 5.04 → 5.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 46 IPFIP 4.61 → 5.37 (+0.75)K% 22.8% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.78% | — | ×0.810 | 18.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.83% | — | ×1.100 | 21.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.69% | ÷1.048 | ×1.200 | 1.93% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 110).
Result: FIP 4.61 → 5.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Red Sox · 20 IPFIP 2.41 → 3.54 (+1.12)K% 24.4% → 16.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.42% | — | ×0.680 | 16.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.81% | — | ×1.250 | 7.27% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.16% | ÷0.974 | ×1.400 | 1.67% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 2.41 → 3.54, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Greenville Drive · 106 IPFIP 3.39 → 4.37 (+0.98)K% 25.9% → 20.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.95% | — | ×0.770 | 19.98% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.78% | — | ×1.150 | 13.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.80% | ÷0.996 | ×1.250 | 2.25% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 3.39 → 4.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.1 | 104 | 25.1% | 13.9% | 1.29 | 4.70 |
| Dan Warthen ('75-'78, 1 WAR*) | 1.5 | 102 | 24.8%* | 14.2%* | 1.27* | 4.86* |
| Michael Kopech ('25) | 2.1 | 103 | 25.8% | 12.5% | 1.45 | 4.14 |
| Bob Gibson ('83-'87, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 67 | 20.4%* | 14.0%* | 1.14* | 4.52* |
| Tim Birtsas ('85-'90, -0 WAR*) | 1.6 | 82 | 21.4%* | 11.7%* | 1.31* | 4.63* |
| Touki Toussaint ('25) | 1.4 | 40 | 23.1% | 14.1% | 1.24 | 5.42 |
| Britt Reames ('06) | 1.1 | 73 | 20.7% | 12.0% | 1.32 | 5.28 |