Trenton Denholm
P Columbus Clippers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 26 | 148 | 3.09 | 3.61 | 21.1% | 6.0% | — | K 16.4% · BB 6.8% · FIP 4.27 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 27 | 19 | 130 | 3.88 | 3.40 | 20.5% | 4.9% | — | K 16.6% · BB 5.4% · FIP 4.25 |
| 2026 | 26 | AAACLE | 29 | 18 | 129 | 4.59 | 3.73 | 22.6% | 5.9% | — | K 19.4% · BB 5.3% · FIP 4.08 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBCLE | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4.43 | 4.43 | 17.5% | 4.9% | 0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 28 | MLBCLE | 5 | 5 | 35 | 4.47 | 4.50 | 17.8% | 5.3% | 0.4 | |
| 2029PROJ59% MLB | 29 | MLBCLE | 7 | 7 | 43 | 4.55 | 4.61 | 17.9% | 5.7% | 0.4 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 22 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | 23 | 23 | 98 | 432 | 107 | 40 | 8 | 100% | 4.2 | 18.3% | 10.9% | 7.4% | 2.4% | 4.79 | 4.24 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A RAW | Lynchburg Hillcats | 23 | 23 | 98 | 432 | 107 | 40 | 8 | 100% | 4.2 | 24.8% | 9.3% | 15.5% | 1.9% | 4.79 | 3.20 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | 23 | 6 | 77 | 316 | 67 | 18 | 4 | 26% | 3.3 | 16.3% | 6.6% | 9.8% | 1.5% | 3.16 | 3.37 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A+ RAW | Lake County Captains | 23 | 6 | 77 | 316 | 67 | 18 | 4 | 26% | 3.3 | 21.2% | 5.7% | 15.5% | 1.3% | 3.16 | 2.74 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 26 | 148 | 603 | 127 | 36 | 17 | 100% | 5.7 | 16.4% | 6.8% | 9.7% | 3.1% | 3.09 | 4.27 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 26 | 148 | 603 | 127 | 36 | 17 | 100% | 5.7 | 16.4% | 6.8% | 9.7% | 3.1% | 3.09 | 4.27 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 26 | 148 | 603 | 127 | 36 | 17 | 100% | 5.7 | 21.1% | 6.0% | 15.1% | 2.8% | 3.09 | 3.61 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 19 | 130 | 547 | 112 | 27 | 14 | 70% | 4.8 | 16.6% | 5.4% | 11.2% | 3.4% | 3.88 | 4.25 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 19 | 130 | 547 | 112 | 27 | 14 | 70% | 4.8 | 16.6% | 5.4% | 11.2% | 3.4% | 3.88 | 4.25 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 27 | 19 | 130 | 547 | 112 | 27 | 14 | 70% | 4.8 | 20.5% | 4.9% | 15.5% | 2.6% | 3.88 | 3.40 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 29 | 18 | 129 | 558 | 126 | 33 | 18 | 62% | 4.5 | 19.4% | 5.3% | 14.1% | 3.5% | 4.59 | 4.08 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 29 | 18 | 129 | 558 | 126 | 33 | 18 | 62% | 4.5 | 19.4% | 5.3% | 14.1% | 3.5% | 4.59 | 4.08 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | 29 | 18 | 129 | 558 | 126 | 33 | 18 | 62% | 4.5 | 22.6% | 5.9% | 16.7% | 3.2% | 4.59 | 3.73 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | CLE | 1 | 1 | 9 | 38 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 100% | 9.0 | 17.5% | 4.9% | 12.6% | 3.3% | 4.43 | 4.43 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | CLE | 13 | 13 | 81 | 343 | 61 | 18 | 12 | 100% | 6.2 | 17.8% | 5.3% | 12.5% | 3.4% | 4.47 | 4.50 | +0.8 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | CLE | 11 | 11 | 73 | 308 | 55 | 18 | 11 | 100% | 6.6 | 17.9% | 5.7% | 12.2% | 3.5% | 4.55 | 4.61 | +0.7 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10 | 10 | 66 | 277 | 49 | 17 | 10 | 100% | 6.6 | 17.8% | 6.1% | 11.6% | 3.7% | 4.67 | 4.77 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 31 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10 | 10 | 64 | 272 | 53 | 16 | 11 | 100% | 6.4 | 19.5% | 5.7% | 13.7% | 3.9% | 4.68 | 4.69 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 32 | MLB MLE | CLE | 9 | 9 | 56 | 237 | 45 | 14 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.0% | 6.1% | 12.9% | 4.1% | 4.82 | 4.91 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | CLE | 5 | 5 | 35 | 148 | 26 | 8 | 5 | 100% | 7.0 | 17.8% | 5.3% | 12.5% | 3.4% | 4.47 | 4.50 | +0.4 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | CLE | 7 | 7 | 43 | 182 | 32 | 10 | 6 | 100% | 6.1 | 17.9% | 5.7% | 12.2% | 3.5% | 4.55 | 4.61 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB CTX | CLE | 7 | 7 | 46 | 194 | 34 | 12 | 7 | 100% | 6.6 | 17.8% | 6.1% | 11.6% | 3.7% | 4.66 | 4.76 | +0.3 |
| 2031 | 31 | MLB CTX | CLE | 8 | 8 | 50 | 211 | 41 | 12 | 8 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.5% | 5.7% | 13.7% | 3.9% | 4.67 | 4.68 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 32 | MLB CTX | CLE | 7 | 7 | 47 | 198 | 38 | 12 | 8 | 100% | 6.7 | 19.0% | 6.1% | 12.9% | 4.1% | 4.81 | 4.90 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 221 | 933 | 172 | 54 | 35 | 100% | 6.5 | 18.4% | 5.8% | 12.6% | 3.7% | 4.64 | 4.32 | +2.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 31 | 31 | 200 | 844 | 156 | 49 | 32 | 100% | 6.4 | 18.4% | 5.8% | 12.6% | 3.7% | 4.64 | 4.32 | +2.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 128 | 92 | 582 | 2456 | 429 | 168 | 72 | 72% | 4.5 | 17.5% | 6.8% | 10.6% | 2.9% | 3.89 | 4.10 | +2.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 44 | 32 | 200 | 844 | 147 | 58 | 25 | 72% | 4.5 | 17.5% | 6.8% | 10.6% | 2.9% | 3.89 | 4.10 | +1.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAColumbus Clippers · 129 IPFIP 3.71 → 4.08 (+0.37)K% 22.6% → 19.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.58% | — | ×0.860 | 19.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.91% | — | ×0.900 | 5.32% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.23% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 3.55% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.71 → 4.08, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAkron RubberDucks · 127 IPFIP 3.43 → 4.25 (+0.82)K% 20.5% → 16.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.49% | — | ×0.810 | 16.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.89% | — | ×1.100 | 5.38% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.63% | ÷0.926 | ×1.200 | 3.41% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 3.43 → 4.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Lake County Captains · 107 IPFIP 3.62 → 4.22 (+0.61)K% 21.5% → 16.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.49% | — | ×0.770 | 16.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.66% | — | ×1.150 | 6.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.94% | ÷1.190 | ×1.250 | 3.09% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 138).
Result: FIP 3.62 → 4.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAkron RubberDucks · 42 IPFIP 3.65 → 4.39 (+0.74)K% 19.9% → 16.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.88% | — | ×0.810 | 16.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.83% | — | ×1.100 | 7.52% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.48% | ÷0.966 | ×1.200 | 3.09% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 93).
Result: FIP 3.65 → 4.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Lake County Captains · 77 IPFIP 2.73 → 3.37 (+0.64)K% 21.2% → 16.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.20% | — | ×0.770 | 16.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.70% | — | ×1.150 | 6.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.27% | ÷1.060 | ×1.250 | 1.49% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 2.73 → 3.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ALynchburg Hillcats · 98 IPFIP 3.20 → 4.24 (+1.04)K% 24.8% → 18.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.77% | — | ×0.740 | 18.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.26% | — | ×1.180 | 10.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.85% | ÷1.015 | ×1.300 | 2.37% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 3.20 → 4.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.2 | 72 | 18.1% | 5.6% | 1.39 | 4.58 |
| Austin Pruitt ('24) | 1.6 | 63 | 16.6% | 5.6% | 1.31 | 4.54 |
| Minnie Rojas ('66-'68, 1 WAR*) | 1.3 | 87 | 17.1%* | 6.5%* | 1.35* | 4.07* |
| Rich Monteleone ('87-'96, 2 WAR*) | 1.8 | 71 | 18.7%* | 7.5%* | 1.39* | 4.03* |
| Donn Pall ('88-'98, 3 WAR*) | 2.5 | 63 | 17.1%* | 6.2%* | 1.20* | 3.86* |
| Nelson Cruz ('03) | 1.7 | 58 | 18.2% | 7.2% | 1.52 | 5.04 |
| Bob Wells ('02) | 3.2 | 79 | 15.0% | 7.2% | 1.43 | 5.03 |