Ronald Ramirez
SS FCL Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17 | ROKDSL Tigers 2 | 175 | .343/.462/.429 | 1 | 6 | 71 | — | .224/.333/.286 |
| 2025 | 18 | ROKDET | 145 | .242/.347/.282 | 0 | 7 | 26 | — | .168/.243/.191 |
| 2026 | 19 | A/ROKDET | 141 | .333/.410/.520 | 4 | 11 | 86 | — | .248/.302/.380 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 20 | MLBDET | 251 | .206/.273/.297 | 3 | 5 | 62 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 21 | MLBDET | 49 | .207/.275/.304 | 1 | 1 | 67 | -0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ48% MLB | 22 | MLBDET | 115 | .211/.280/.315 | 2 | 3 | 71 | 0.0 |
Tools · ContractCON 36 / POW 39
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 17 | ROK | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 175 | 140 | 48 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 29 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 343 | 462 | 429 | 891 | 86 | 412 | 17 | 14 | 400 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 145 | 124 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 31 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 242 | 347 | 282 | 629 | 40 | 319 | 21 | 12 | 297 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 36 | 32 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 312 | 389 | 531 | 920 | 219 | 429 | 28 | 11 | 402 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 105 | 91 | 31 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 24 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 341 | 417 | 516 | 934 | 176 | 424 | 23 | 11 | 405 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 175 | 147 | 33 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 36 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 224 | 333 | 286 | 619 | 61 | 265 | 21 | 10 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 145 | 131 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 45 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 168 | 243 | 191 | 434 | 23 | 251 | 31 | 7 | 206 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 36 | 33 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 273 | 333 | 485 | 818 | 212 | 393 | 39 | 8 | 308 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 105 | 96 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 35 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 240 | 291 | 344 | 635 | 104 | 339 | 33 | 7 | 291 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 175 | 147 | 33 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 36 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 224 | 333 | 286 | 619 | 61 | 281 | 21 | 10 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 175 | 140 | 48 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 29 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 343 | 462 | 429 | 891 | 86 | 412 | 17 | 14 | 400 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 145 | 131 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 45 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 168 | 243 | 191 | 434 | 23 | 253 | 31 | 7 | 206 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | — | 145 | 124 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 31 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 242 | 347 | 282 | 629 | 40 | 319 | 21 | 12 | 297 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 141 | 129 | 32 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 48 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 248 | 302 | 380 | 682 | 132 | 362 | 34 | 7 | 295 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 141 | 123 | 41 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 34 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 333 | 410 | 520 | 930 | 187 | 425 | 24 | 11 | 404 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 175 | 149 | 33 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 36 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 221 | 333 | 282 | 615 | 60 | 265 | 21 | 10 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 145 | 131 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 45 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 168 | 243 | 191 | 434 | 23 | 251 | 31 | 7 | 206 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 141 | 130 | 32 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 48 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 246 | 302 | 377 | 679 | 131 | 353 | 34 | 7 | 295 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 175 | 149 | 33 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 36 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 221 | 333 | 282 | 615 | 60 | 265 | 21 | 10 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 145 | 131 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 45 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 168 | 243 | 191 | 434 | 23 | 251 | 31 | 7 | 206 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 141 | 130 | 32 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 48 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 246 | 302 | 377 | 679 | 131 | 353 | 34 | 7 | 295 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 20 | MLB MLE | DET | 0% | 251 | 228 | 47 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 67 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 206 | 273 | 297 | 569 | 90 | 274 | 27 | 7 | 259 | 62 | -11 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +5 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 21 | MLB MLE | DET | 34% | 143 | 129 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 38 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 211 | 278 | 311 | 589 | 100 | 276 | 27 | 8 | 267 | 67 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +3 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 22 | MLB MLE | DET | 48% | 237 | 214 | 46 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 61 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 215 | 283 | 322 | 605 | 107 | 278 | 26 | 8 | 274 | 71 | -8 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +5 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 23 | MLB MLE | DET | 54% | 332 | 300 | 65 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 25 | 85 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 218 | 286 | 330 | 617 | 113 | 279 | 26 | 8 | 279 | 75 | -10 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +7 | 0.2 |
| 2031 | 24 | MLB MLE | DET | 55% | 396 | 359 | 79 | 14 | 2 | 8 | 30 | 100 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 220 | 289 | 337 | 626 | 117 | 281 | 25 | 8 | 282 | 77 | -11 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +9 | 0.3 |
| 2032 | 25 | MLB MLE | DET | 56% | 432 | 391 | 87 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 33 | 109 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 222 | 291 | 341 | 632 | 119 | 282 | 25 | 8 | 285 | 79 | -11 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +9 | 0.4 |
| 2033 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 56% | 451 | 408 | 91 | 16 | 3 | 9 | 35 | 113 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 222 | 291 | 341 | 632 | 119 | 281 | 25 | 8 | 285 | 79 | -11 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +10 | 0.4 |
| 2034 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 55% | 458 | 414 | 92 | 16 | 3 | 9 | 36 | 116 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 221 | 290 | 338 | 628 | 118 | 281 | 25 | 8 | 283 | 78 | -12 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +10 | 0.4 |
| 2035 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 55% | 456 | 413 | 91 | 16 | 3 | 9 | 35 | 116 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 219 | 288 | 334 | 622 | 115 | 280 | 25 | 8 | 281 | 76 | -13 | +1 | -1 | +5 | +10 | 0.2 |
| 2036 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 53% | 447 | 405 | 88 | 15 | 3 | 8 | 34 | 115 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 217 | 285 | 328 | 614 | 111 | 279 | 26 | 8 | 277 | 74 | -14 | +1 | -1 | +5 | +10 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 21 | MLB CTX | DET | 34% | 49 | 44 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 207 | 275 | 304 | 579 | 97 | 272 | 27 | 8 | 263 | 67 | -2 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +1 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 22 | MLB CTX | DET | 48% | 115 | 104 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 30 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 211 | 280 | 315 | 595 | 104 | 274 | 26 | 8 | 270 | 71 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +2 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 23 | MLB CTX | DET | 54% | 180 | 162 | 35 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 46 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 214 | 283 | 323 | 606 | 109 | 275 | 26 | 8 | 274 | 75 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +4 | 0.1 |
| 2031 | 24 | MLB CTX | DET | 55% | 219 | 198 | 42 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 55 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 217 | 286 | 329 | 615 | 113 | 277 | 25 | 8 | 278 | 77 | -6 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +5 | 0.2 |
| 2032 | 25 | MLB CTX | DET | 56% | 242 | 218 | 47 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 61 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 218 | 288 | 333 | 621 | 115 | 277 | 25 | 8 | 280 | 79 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +5 | 0.2 |
| 2033 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 56% | 254 | 229 | 51 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 64 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 218 | 287 | 333 | 621 | 115 | 277 | 25 | 8 | 280 | 79 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +6 | 0.2 |
| 2034 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 55% | 253 | 228 | 50 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 64 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 217 | 287 | 331 | 617 | 114 | 276 | 25 | 8 | 279 | 78 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +5 | 0.2 |
| 2035 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 55% | 250 | 226 | 48 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 64 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 215 | 285 | 326 | 611 | 111 | 276 | 26 | 8 | 276 | 76 | -7 | +0 | -0 | +3 | +5 | 0.1 |
| 2036 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 53% | 239 | 217 | 46 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 62 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 213 | 282 | 321 | 603 | 108 | 275 | 26 | 8 | 273 | 74 | -7 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +5 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1801 | 1626 | 352 | 61 | 9 | 34 | 140 | 459 | 20 | 41 | 13 | 216 | 287 | 328 | 614 | 111 | 279 | 25 | 8 | 277 | 74 | -51 | +3 | -1 | +19 | +39 | 1.0 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 587 | 127 | 22 | 3 | 12 | 51 | 166 | 7 | 15 | 5 | 216 | 287 | 325 | 613 | 109 | 279 | 26 | 8 | 277 | 74 | -18 | +1 | -0 | +7 | +14 | 0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3897 | 3517 | 770 | 132 | 24 | 69 | 300 | 1004 | 49 | 104 | 34 | 219 | 289 | 329 | 618 | 110 | 284 | 26 | 8 | 278 | 74 | -99 | +7 | -2 | +37 | +74 | 1.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 587 | 129 | 22 | 4 | 12 | 50 | 167 | 8 | 17 | 6 | 220 | 290 | 332 | 622 | 112 | 284 | 26 | 8 | 278 | 74 | -19 | +1 | -0 | +7 | +14 | 0.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Tigers · 105 PAwOBA .402 → .291 (−111)K% 22.9% → 32.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.86% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 32.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.43% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 7.05% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 34.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.013 | ×0.995 | 28.39% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.48% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.013 | ×0.995 | 3.25% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.99% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.013 | ×0.995 | 2.17% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.48% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 3.48% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.013.
Result: wOBA .402 → .291; ISO .176 → .125; BABIP .424 → .339. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 36 PAwOBA .392 → .308 (−84)K% 27.8% → 37.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.78% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 37.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 7.90% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.27% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.030 | 25.84% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.09% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.030 | 7.77% |
| Triples /BIP | 4.55% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.030 | 4.26% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.55% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 3.75% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .392 → .308; ISO .219 → .168; BABIP .429 → .393. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Tigers · 145 PAwOBA .290 → .206 (−84)K% 21.4% → 30.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.38% | ÷1.001 | ×1.440 | — | — | 30.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.03% | ÷0.996 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 6.92% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.07% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 1.50% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.88% | ÷0.974 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 21.66% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.38% | ÷0.992 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 3.74% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.880 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 95, 2B 98, 3B 80, K 100, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .290 → .206; ISO .040 → .027; BABIP .319 → .251. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 DSLDSL Tigers 2 · 175 PAwOBA .399 → .273 (−126)K% 16.6% → 20.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.57% | ÷0.986 | ×1.220 | — | — | 20.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.71% | ÷0.973 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 9.94% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.00% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 2.82% |
| Singles /BIP | 34.23% | ÷0.995 | ×0.680 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 22.40% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.11% | ÷0.951 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 4.89% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.135 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.90% | ÷0.995 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.43% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 99, 1B 99, 2B 90, 3B 127, K 97, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .399 → .273; ISO .086 → .052; BABIP .412 → .265. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).