Jose Paniagua
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 20 | ROKCHC | 275 | .305/.400/.511 | 6 | 20 | 49 | — | .180/.259/.287 |
| 2015 | 21 | ROKAZL Cubs | 168 | .255/.304/.401 | 4 | 1 | 30 | — | .181/.220/.288 |
| 2016 | 22 | ACHC | 23 | .095/.136/.095 | 0 | 0 | -52 | — | .095/.136/.095 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 18 | ROK | DSL Cubs 1 | — | 185 | 171 | 36 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 46 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 211 | 258 | 298 | 556 | 88 | 274 | 25 | 5 | 248 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | ROK | DSL Cubs | — | 240 | 209 | 43 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 53 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 206 | 305 | 306 | 612 | 100 | 265 | 22 | 11 | 283 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | ROK | DSL Cubs | — | 275 | 233 | 71 | 22 | 4 | 6 | 35 | 56 | 2 | 20 | 4 | 305 | 400 | 511 | 911 | 206 | 374 | 20 | 13 | 394 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | ROK | AZL Cubs | — | 168 | 157 | 40 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 39 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 255 | 304 | 401 | 705 | 146 | 316 | 23 | 5 | 314 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A | South Bend Cubs | — | 23 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 136 | 95 | 232 | 125 | 26 | 4 | 109 | -52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs 1 | — | 185 | 174 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 56 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 138 | 176 | 184 | 360 | 46 | 188 | 30 | 4 | 159 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs | — | 240 | 218 | 26 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 65 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 119 | 197 | 174 | 371 | 55 | 164 | 27 | 8 | 174 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs | — | 275 | 244 | 44 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 24 | 68 | 2 | 20 | 4 | 180 | 259 | 287 | 546 | 107 | 224 | 25 | 9 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Cubs | — | 168 | 160 | 29 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 56 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 181 | 220 | 287 | 508 | 106 | 252 | 33 | 3 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 23 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 136 | 95 | 232 | 115 | 35 | 4 | 91 | -52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs 1 | — | 185 | 174 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 56 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 138 | 176 | 184 | 360 | 46 | 195 | 30 | 4 | 159 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Cubs 1 | — | 185 | 171 | 36 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 46 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 211 | 258 | 298 | 556 | 88 | 274 | 25 | 5 | 248 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs | — | 240 | 218 | 26 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 65 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 119 | 197 | 174 | 371 | 55 | 163 | 27 | 8 | 174 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Cubs | — | 240 | 209 | 43 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 53 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 206 | 305 | 306 | 612 | 100 | 265 | 22 | 11 | 283 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs | — | 275 | 244 | 44 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 24 | 68 | 2 | 20 | 4 | 180 | 259 | 287 | 546 | 107 | 233 | 25 | 9 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL Cubs | — | 275 | 233 | 71 | 22 | 4 | 6 | 35 | 56 | 2 | 20 | 4 | 305 | 400 | 511 | 911 | 206 | 374 | 20 | 13 | 394 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Cubs | — | 168 | 160 | 29 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 56 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 181 | 220 | 287 | 508 | 106 | 257 | 33 | 3 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | ROK RAW | AZL Cubs | — | 168 | 157 | 40 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 39 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 255 | 304 | 401 | 705 | 146 | 316 | 23 | 5 | 314 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 23 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 136 | 95 | 232 | 143 | 35 | 4 | 91 | -52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2016 | 22 | A RAW | South Bend Cubs | — | 23 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 136 | 95 | 232 | 125 | 26 | 4 | 109 | -52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs 1 | — | 185 | 175 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 56 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 137 | 176 | 183 | 359 | 46 | 188 | 30 | 4 | 159 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs | — | 240 | 217 | 26 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 65 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 120 | 197 | 175 | 372 | 55 | 164 | 27 | 8 | 174 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs | — | 275 | 247 | 44 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 24 | 68 | 2 | 20 | 4 | 178 | 259 | 283 | 543 | 105 | 224 | 25 | 9 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Cubs | — | 168 | 158 | 29 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 56 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 184 | 220 | 291 | 511 | 108 | 252 | 33 | 3 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 23 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 91 | 136 | 91 | 227 | 115 | 35 | 4 | 91 | -52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 891 | 817 | 125 | 29 | 5 | 8 | 55 | 253 | 9 | 29 | 18 | 153 | 215 | 230 | 445 | 77 | 208 | 28 | 6 | 196 | 19 | -86 | -1 | +0 | -16 | +19 | -8.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 596 | 92 | 21 | 4 | 6 | 40 | 185 | 7 | 21 | 13 | 154 | 216 | 233 | 449 | 79 | 210 | 28 | 6 | 196 | 19 | -63 | -1 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -6.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2016 ASouth Bend Cubs · 23 PAwOBA .111 → .091 (−20)K% 26.1% → 36.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.09% | ÷0.973 | ×1.360 | — | — | 36.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.35% | ÷0.968 | ×0.690 | — | — | 3.10% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 13.33% | ÷0.993 | ×0.920 | — | — | 12.36% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.963 | ×0.830 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.997 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 99, 1B 99, 2B 93, 3B 80, K 95, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .111 → .091; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .125 → .115. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 ROKAZL Cubs · 168 PAwOBA .306 → .212 (−94)K% 23.2% → 33.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.21% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 33.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 2.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.79% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 1.27% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.03% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.030 | ×0.985 | 18.33% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.030 | ×0.985 | 5.57% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.85% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.030 | ×0.985 | 0.62% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.39% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 2.60% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.
Result: wOBA .306 → .212; ISO .146 → .098; BABIP .316 → .252. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 DSLDSL Cubs · 275 PAwOBA .388 → .240 (−148)K% 20.4% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.36% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 24.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.73% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.985 | 8.78% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.73% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.985 | 0.50% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.03% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.957 | ×0.985 | 14.12% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.43% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.957 | ×0.985 | 7.03% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.957 | ×0.985 | 1.28% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.39% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.985 | 1.57% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 18.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.957.
Result: wOBA .388 → .240; ISO .206 → .111; BABIP .374 → .224. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 DSLDSL Cubs · 240 PAwOBA .276 → .174 (−102)K% 22.1% → 26.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.08% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 26.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 7.55% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.25% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 0.87% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.31% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.959 | ×0.995 | 11.24% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.959 | ×0.995 | 4.77% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.64% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.959 | ×0.995 | 0.37% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.28% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.995 | 0.60% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.959.
Result: wOBA .276 → .174; ISO .100 → .054; BABIP .265 → .164. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 DSLDSL Cubs 1 · 185 PAwOBA .243 → .159 (−85)K% 24.9% → 30.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.86% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 30.34% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.41% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 3.81% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.54% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 0.38% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.033 | ×1.008 | 15.29% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.033 | ×1.008 | 2.50% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.033 | ×1.008 | 1.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.76% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.033.
Result: wOBA .243 → .159; ISO .088 → .048; BABIP .274 → .188. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).