Bryan Martinez

3B ACL Angels
Age 21 L/R 6'2" / 170 lbs ROK K +5%HR +4% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2038
Overview
ROKPROSPECTMiLBFA 2039
MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202418ROKLAA176.275/.398/.39412348—.180/.281/.247
202519ROKLAA149.259/.315/.4073312—.145/.192/.225
202620ROKLAA134.192/.271/.367427—.120/.173/.232
2027PROJMLE21MLBLAA244.187/.245/.2813547-0.2
2028PROJ34% MLB22MLBLAA41.191/.250/.2931153-0.1
Next 2 projected WAR -0.3Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2038Service0.0First FA2039
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029Ext$0.0M2030Ext$0.0M2031Ext$0.0M2032Ext$0.0M2033Ext$0.9M2034Ext$1.0M+4
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 Rk
ISO76
Speed74
Whiff%29
Z-Con%17
BB%11
K%10
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 100%
CompsDanyer Sanabria (age 20) · Cole Roederer (age 21) · Luis Mendez (age 21)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONpark-neutral Marcel · 69 proj PA
wRC+†47
AVG/OBP/SLG.186 / .243 / .278
PA69
HR1
K%31
BB%6
ISO94
MLB%0%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -4.3 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-4BATRUN: +0.2 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)+0RUNFLD: +0.0 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+0FLDPOS: +0.2 runs (Positional adjustment)+0POSREP: +1.5 runs (Replacement-level credit)+1REPTotal WAR: -0.20-0.2WAR
trajectory · projected WAR by year
-0.2-0.12728
Tools · ContractCON 25 / POW 44
Toolsscout grade
CONTACT25
scouting grade only
POWER44
scouting grade only
EYE41
scouting grade only
SPEED51
scouting grade only
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2033
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2038
First FA Year   2039
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2033
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2033
2029Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2030Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2031Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2032Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2035Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2036Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2037Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2038Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $0.0M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202317 ROKDSL Angels — 4134 7100 7150 33 206341235577 29368 3717 283 9 — — — — — —
202418 ROKDSL Angels — 176142 39641 24405 238 275398394792 120365 2314 352 48 — — — — — —
202519 ROKACL Angels — 149135 35533 7524 33 259315407722 148390 355 316 12 — — — — — —
202620 ROKACL Angels — 134120 23524 12441 20 192271367637 175260 339 283 7 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202317 ROK MLEDSL Angels — 4136 5100 5180 33 139244167411 28245 4412 181 9 — — — — — —
202418 ROK MLEDSL Angels — 176150 27430 16475 238 180281247527 67240 279 239 48 — — — — — —
202519 ROK MLEACL Angels — 149138 20312 4774 33 145192225416 80287 523 186 12 — — — — — —
202620 ROK MLEACL Angels — 134125 15313 7631 20 120173232405 112205 475 178 7 — — — — — —
202317 ROK MLEDSL Angels — 4136 5100 5180 33 139244167411 28278 4412 181 9 — — — — — —
202317 ROK RAWDSL Angels — 4134 7100 7150 33 206341235577 29368 3717 283 9 — — — — — —
202418 ROK MLEDSL Angels — 176150 27430 16475 238 180281247527 67255 279 239 48 — — — — — —
202418 ROK RAWDSL Angels — 176142 39641 24405 238 275398394792 120365 2314 352 48 — — — — — —
202519 ROK MLEACL Angels — 149138 20312 4774 33 145192225416 80295 523 186 12 — — — — — —
202519 ROK RAWACL Angels — 149135 35533 7524 33 259315407722 148390 355 316 12 — — — — — —
202620 ROK MLEACL Angels — 134125 15313 7631 20 120173232405 112200 475 178 7 — — — — — —
202620 ROK RAWACL Angels — 134120 23524 12441 20 192271367637 175260 339 283 7 — — — — — —
202317 ROK MLEDSL Angels — 4136 5100 5180 33 139244167411 28245 4412 181 9 — — — — — —
202418 ROK MLEDSL Angels — 176153 27430 16475 238 176281242523 65240 279 239 48 — — — — — —
202519 ROK MLEACL Angels — 149140 20312 4774 33 143192221413 79287 523 186 12 — — — — — —
202620 ROK MLEACL Angels — 134125 15313 7631 20 120173232405 112205 475 178 7 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202418 ROK MLEDSL Angels — 176153 27430 16475 238 176281242523 65240 279 239 48 — — — — — —
202519 ROK MLEACL Angels — 149140 20312 4774 33 143192221413 79287 523 186 12 — — — — — —
202620 ROK MLEACL Angels — 134125 15313 7631 20 120173232405 112205 475 178 7 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202721 MLB MLELAA 0% 244225 42723 14763 51 187245281525 94263 316 238 47 -15 +1 +0 +1 +5 -0.2
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202822 MLB MLELAA 34% 119110 22412 7361 21 193251295546 102265 306 247 53 -7 +0 +0 +0 +3 -0.4
202822 MLB CTXLAA 34% 4139 7101 2120 10 191250293543 102263 295 246 53 -2 +0 +0 +0 +1 -0.1
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 4139 7101 2120 10 179220282502 103231 295 246 31 -2 +0 +0 +0 +1 -0.1
/ 162G— A+C — 650618 11116016 321900 160 180220283503 104231 295 246 31 -36 +3 +0 +2 +14 -1.7
Career— MLE — 688623 1011778 4326212 3415 162230250480 88258 386 213 31 -11 +0 +0 +1 +4 -0.6
/ 162G— MLE — 650589 961678 4124811 3214 163231255486 92259 386 213 31 -38 +1 +0 +2 +14 -2.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 ROKACL Angels · 134 PAwOBA .278 → .178 (−100)K% 32.8% → 47.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA32.84%÷1.000×1.440——47.28%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.96%÷1.000×0.620—×0.9855.47%
HBP% /PA0.75%—×0.720—×0.9850.53%
Singles /BIP15.79%÷1.000×0.820×1.039×0.98513.25%
Doubles /BIP6.58%÷1.000×0.720×1.039×0.9854.85%
Triples /BIP2.63%÷1.000×0.720×1.039×0.9851.94%
Home runs /BIP5.26%÷1.000×0.780—×0.9854.04%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.039.

Result: wOBA .278 → .178; ISO .175 → .109; BABIP .260 → .205. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ROKACL Angels · 149 PAwOBA .311 → .186 (−126)K% 34.9% → 51.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA34.90%÷0.969×1.440——51.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA4.70%÷1.082×0.620—×0.9952.68%
HBP% /PA2.68%—×0.720—×0.9951.92%
Singles /BIP28.92%÷1.015×0.820×0.960×0.99522.32%
Doubles /BIP6.02%÷0.992×0.720×0.960×0.9954.18%
Triples /BIP3.61%÷1.134×0.720×0.960×0.9952.19%
Home runs /BIP3.61%÷0.873×0.780—×0.9953.21%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 103, 2B 98, 3B 127, K 94, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.960.

Result: wOBA .311 → .186; ISO .148 → .087; BABIP .390 → .287. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 DSLDSL Angels · 176 PAwOBA .350 → .239 (−111)K% 22.7% → 26.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA22.73%÷1.038×1.220——26.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA13.64%÷1.064×0.700—×0.9958.93%
HBP% /PA2.84%—×0.700—×0.9951.98%
Singles /BIP27.45%÷1.052×0.680×1.050×0.99518.54%
Doubles /BIP5.88%÷1.081×0.600×1.050×0.9953.41%
Triples /BIP3.92%÷0.961×0.600×1.050×0.9952.56%
Home runs /BIP0.98%÷1.068×0.470—×0.9950.43%

Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 114, 1B 110, 2B 116, 3B 92, K 108, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .350 → .239; ISO .120 → .076; BABIP .365 → .240. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 DSLDSL Angels · 41 PAwOBA .277 → .181 (−96)K% 36.6% → 44.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA36.59%÷1.002×1.220——44.55%
BB% (unintentional) /PA17.07%÷1.018×0.700—×1.00811.82%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.700—×1.0080.00%
Singles /BIP31.58%÷1.028×0.680—×1.00821.05%
Doubles /BIP5.26%÷0.927×0.600—×1.0083.43%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.150×0.600—×1.0080.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷0.852×0.470—×1.0080.00%

Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 106, 2B 85, 3B 130, K 100, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .277 → .181; ISO .029 → .018; BABIP .368 → .245. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).