Jonawel Valdez
P Jupiter Hammerheads| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20 | ROKPIT | 8 | 5 | 27 | 3.04 | 2.84 | 25.7% | 11.0% | — | K 17.5% · BB 13.8% · FIP 4.13 |
| 2025 | 21 | APIT | 29 | 3 | 70 | 3.60 | 3.64 | 16.8% | 9.6% | — | K 12.4% · BB 11.3% · FIP 4.53 |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 12 | 0 | 15 | 8.40 | 6.63 | 21.6% | 14.9% | — | K 13.5% · BB 19.3% · FIP 9.60 |
| 2027PROJ | 23 | MLBMIA | — | — | 0 | 6.07 | 6.07 | 12.3% | 15.2% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 24 | MLBMIA | 21 | 0 | 22 | 5.75 | 5.66 | 14.8% | 13.8% | -0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ66% MLB | 25 | MLBMIA | 25 | 0 | 26 | 5.51 | 5.42 | 16.2% | 13.0% | -0.3 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Pirates Black | 12 | 5 | 34 | 156 | 32 | 16 | 1 | 42% | 2.8 | 13.9% | 12.8% | 1.1% | 0.9% | 5.56 | 4.04 | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Pirates Black | 12 | 5 | 34 | 156 | 32 | 16 | 1 | 42% | 2.8 | 20.5% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.6% | 5.56 | 3.01 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Pirates | 8 | 5 | 27 | 109 | 28 | 12 | 1 | 62% | 3.3 | 17.5% | 13.8% | 3.7% | 1.4% | 3.04 | 4.13 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Pirates | 8 | 5 | 27 | 109 | 28 | 12 | 1 | 62% | 3.3 | 17.5% | 13.8% | 3.7% | 1.4% | 3.04 | 4.13 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Pirates | 8 | 5 | 27 | 109 | 28 | 12 | 1 | 62% | 3.3 | 25.7% | 11.0% | 14.7% | 0.9% | 3.04 | 2.84 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | 29 | 3 | 70 | 292 | 49 | 28 | 4 | 10% | 2.4 | 12.4% | 11.3% | 1.1% | 1.9% | 3.60 | 4.53 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | 29 | 3 | 70 | 292 | 49 | 28 | 4 | 10% | 2.4 | 12.4% | 11.3% | 1.1% | 1.9% | 3.60 | 4.53 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Bradenton Marauders | 29 | 3 | 70 | 292 | 49 | 28 | 4 | 10% | 2.4 | 16.8% | 9.6% | 7.2% | 1.4% | 3.60 | 3.64 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 0 | 15 | 74 | 16 | 11 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 13.5% | 19.3% | -5.9% | 9.5% | 8.40 | 9.60 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 0 | 15 | 74 | 16 | 11 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 13.5% | 19.3% | -5.9% | 9.5% | 8.40 | 9.60 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 12 | 0 | 15 | 74 | 16 | 11 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 21.6% | 14.9% | 6.8% | 5.4% | 8.40 | 6.63 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB | MIA | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.3% | 15.2% | -2.9% | 3.1% | 6.07 | 6.07 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | MIA | 50 | 0 | 52 | 221 | 33 | 31 | 7 | 0% | 1.0 | 14.8% | 13.8% | 0.9% | 3.1% | 5.75 | 5.66 | -0.6 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | MIA | 37 | 0 | 39 | 165 | 27 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 16.2% | 13.0% | 3.3% | 3.0% | 5.51 | 5.42 | -0.4 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | MIA | 36 | 0 | 37 | 158 | 27 | 20 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.1% | 12.8% | 4.3% | 3.0% | 5.37 | 5.32 | -0.3 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | MIA | 34 | 0 | 36 | 152 | 26 | 19 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.2% | 12.8% | 4.5% | 3.1% | 5.34 | 5.33 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | MIA | 21 | 0 | 22 | 93 | 14 | 13 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 14.8% | 13.8% | 0.9% | 3.1% | 5.75 | 5.66 | -0.3 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | MIA | 25 | 0 | 26 | 110 | 18 | 14 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 16.2% | 13.0% | 3.3% | 3.0% | 5.51 | 5.42 | -0.3 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | MIA | 29 | 0 | 30 | 127 | 22 | 16 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.1% | 12.8% | 4.3% | 3.0% | 5.37 | 5.32 | -0.3 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | MIA | 30 | 0 | 31 | 131 | 23 | 17 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.2% | 12.8% | 4.5% | 3.1% | 5.34 | 5.33 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 104 | 0 | 109 | 459 | 75 | 60 | 14 | 0% | 1.0 | 16.4% | 13.0% | 3.4% | 3.1% | 5.47 | 5.04 | -0.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 138 | 110 | 26 | 0% | 1.1 | 16.4% | 13.0% | 3.4% | 3.1% | 5.47 | 5.04 | -1.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 61 | 13 | 146 | 631 | 87 | 82 | 15 | 21% | 2.4 | 13.8% | 13.0% | 0.7% | 2.5% | 4.45 | 4.94 | -1.7 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 84 | 18 | 200 | 866 | 119 | 113 | 21 | 21% | 2.4 | 13.8% | 13.0% | 0.7% | 2.5% | 4.45 | 4.94 | -2.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AJupiter Hammerheads · 11 IPFIP 7.63 → 9.60 (+1.97)K% 18.2% → 13.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.18% | — | ×0.740 | 13.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.36% | — | ×1.180 | 19.31% |
| HR / BF /BF | 7.27% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 9.45% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 7.63 → 9.60, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ABradenton Marauders · 70 IPFIP 3.65 → 4.53 (+0.88)K% 16.8% → 12.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.78% | — | ×0.740 | 12.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.59% | — | ×1.180 | 11.32% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.37% | ÷0.932 | ×1.300 | 1.91% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 86).
Result: FIP 3.65 → 4.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Pirates · 27 IPFIP 2.83 → 4.13 (+1.30)K% 25.7% → 17.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.69% | — | ×0.680 | 17.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.01% | — | ×1.250 | 13.76% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.92% | ÷0.921 | ×1.400 | 1.39% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 2.83 → 4.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Pirates Black · 34 IPFIP 3.02 → 4.04 (+1.02)K% 20.5% → 13.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.51% | — | ×0.680 | 13.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.26% | — | ×1.250 | 12.82% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.64% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.90% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.02 → 4.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.1 | 43 | 15.2% | 13.6% | 1.18 | 5.65 |
| Mike Mohler ('01) | 2.1 | 60 | 15.0% | 12.4% | 0.97 | 4.99 |
| Richie Lewis ('98) | 1.5 | 59 | 18.1% | 14.1% | 1.38 | 4.88 |
| Matt Anderson ('05) | 1.3 | 51 | 19.3% | 13.5% | 1.05 | 5.19 |
| Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 40 | 20.0%* | 12.5%* | 0.98* | 4.96* |
| Daryl Patterson ('68-'74, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 46 | 18.3%* | 11.2%* | 1.27* | 5.03* |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |