Moises Brito
P ACL Dodgers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 20 | ROKDSL LAD Mega | 16 | 3 | 40 | 1.79 | 1.59 | 30.2% | 0.7% | — | K 20.5% · BB 0.8% · FIP 2.53 | |
| 2023 | 21 | ROKLAD | 13 | 12 | 45 | 2.80 | 1.90 | 33.7% | 7.0% | — | K 22.9% · BB 8.7% · FIP 3.16 | |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 14 | 2 | 21 | 7.84 | 6.20 | 25.7% | 16.8% | — | K 18.0% · BB 20.5% · FIP 7.76 | |
| 2025 | 23 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBLAA | — | — | 0 | 4.76 | 4.76 | 22.8% | 12.2% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 26 | MLBLAA | 7 | 0 | 7 | 4.70 | 4.69 | 23.0% | 11.8% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL LAD Mega | 16 | 3 | 40 | 149 | 45 | 1 | 2 | 19% | 2.5 | 20.5% | 0.8% | 19.7% | 1.9% | 1.79 | 2.53 | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL LAD Mega | 16 | 3 | 40 | 149 | 45 | 1 | 2 | 19% | 2.5 | 30.2% | 0.7% | 29.5% | 1.3% | 1.79 | 1.59 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Dodgers | 13 | 12 | 45 | 172 | 58 | 12 | 2 | 92% | 3.5 | 22.9% | 8.7% | 14.2% | 1.6% | 2.80 | 3.16 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | ROK RAW | ACL Dodgers | 13 | 12 | 45 | 172 | 58 | 12 | 2 | 92% | 3.5 | 33.7% | 7.0% | 26.7% | 1.2% | 2.80 | 1.90 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 14 | 2 | 21 | 101 | 26 | 17 | 5 | 14% | 1.5 | 18.0% | 20.5% | -2.4% | 6.5% | 7.84 | 7.76 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 14 | 2 | 21 | 101 | 26 | 17 | 5 | 14% | 1.5 | 18.0% | 20.5% | -2.4% | 6.5% | 7.84 | 7.76 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 14 | 2 | 21 | 101 | 26 | 17 | 5 | 14% | 1.5 | 25.7% | 16.8% | 8.9% | 5.0% | 7.84 | 6.20 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | LAA | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.8% | 12.2% | 10.6% | 3.0% | 4.76 | 4.76 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | LAA | 16 | 0 | 17 | 70 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.0% | 11.8% | 11.2% | 3.0% | 4.70 | 4.69 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | LAA | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.0% | 11.8% | 11.2% | 3.0% | 4.70 | 4.69 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.0% | 11.8% | 11.2% | 3.0% | 4.70 | 4.31 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 197 | 113 | 28 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 11.8% | 11.2% | 3.0% | 4.70 | 4.31 | +0.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 43 | 17 | 106 | 422 | 88 | 37 | 12 | 40% | 2.5 | 20.9% | 8.8% | 12.2% | 2.9% | 3.40 | 4.04 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 81 | 32 | 200 | 796 | 167 | 70 | 23 | 40% | 2.5 | 20.9% | 8.8% | 12.2% | 2.9% | 3.40 | 4.04 | -0.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 ROKACL Dodgers · 11 IPFIP 4.67 → 7.18 (+2.51)K% 33.3% → 22.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.33% | — | ×0.680 | 22.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.65% | — | ×1.250 | 22.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.92% | ÷0.942 | ×1.400 | 5.83% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 4.67 → 7.18, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 9 IPFIP 6.90 → 8.36 (+1.46)K% 18.0% → 13.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.00% | — | ×0.740 | 13.32% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.00% | — | ×1.180 | 18.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 6.00% | ÷1.072 | ×1.300 | 7.28% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 114).
Result: FIP 6.90 → 8.36, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKACL Dodgers · 45 IPFIP 1.77 → 3.16 (+1.38)K% 33.7% → 22.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.72% | — | ×0.680 | 22.93% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.98% | — | ×1.250 | 8.72% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.16% | ÷1.005 | ×1.400 | 1.62% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 1.77 → 3.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL LAD Mega · 40 IPFIP 1.37 → 2.53 (+1.16)K% 30.2% → 20.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.20% | — | ×0.680 | 20.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.67% | — | ×1.250 | 0.84% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.34% | ÷0.975 | ×1.400 | 1.93% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 1.37 → 2.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).