Spencer Giesting
P Reno Aces| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 25 | 141 | 3.31 | 2.96 | 26.2% | 7.5% | — | K 20.8% · BB 8.3% · FIP 3.58 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 27 | 27 | 136 | 5.31 | 4.31 | 21.3% | 10.4% | — | K 17.8% · BB 10.0% · FIP 4.64 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 35 | 1 | 56 | 4.50 | 3.26 | 29.5% | 10.6% | — | K 24.3% · BB 10.1% · FIP 3.83 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBARI | 3 | 3 | 16 | 4.63 | 4.63 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 27 | MLBARI | 9 | 9 | 56 | 4.53 | 4.54 | 20.6% | 9.6% | 0.5 | |
| 2029PROJ63% MLB | 28 | MLBARI | 12 | 12 | 73 | 4.55 | 4.59 | 20.6% | 9.6% | 0.6 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 9 | 4 | 15 | 68 | 19 | 10 | 3 | 44% | 1.7 | 20.8% | 16.6% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 7.04 | 5.80 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 9 | 4 | 15 | 68 | 19 | 10 | 3 | 44% | 1.7 | 27.9% | 14.7% | 13.2% | 4.4% | 7.04 | 5.12 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ MLE | Hillsboro Hops | 24 | 24 | 117 | 523 | 124 | 71 | 9 | 100% | 4.9 | 18.3% | 15.6% | 2.6% | 2.3% | 4.00 | 4.78 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ RAW | Hillsboro Hops | 24 | 24 | 117 | 523 | 124 | 71 | 9 | 100% | 4.9 | 23.7% | 13.6% | 10.1% | 1.7% | 4.00 | 3.80 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 141 | 588 | 154 | 44 | 12 | 100% | 5.7 | 20.8% | 8.3% | 12.4% | 2.1% | 3.31 | 3.58 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 141 | 588 | 154 | 44 | 12 | 100% | 5.7 | 20.8% | 8.3% | 12.4% | 2.1% | 3.31 | 3.58 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 141 | 588 | 154 | 44 | 12 | 100% | 5.7 | 26.2% | 7.5% | 18.7% | 2.0% | 3.31 | 2.96 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 27 | 136 | 615 | 131 | 64 | 18 | 100% | 5.0 | 17.8% | 10.0% | 7.9% | 3.3% | 5.31 | 4.64 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 27 | 136 | 615 | 131 | 64 | 18 | 100% | 5.0 | 17.8% | 10.0% | 7.9% | 3.3% | 5.31 | 4.64 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 27 | 27 | 136 | 615 | 131 | 64 | 18 | 100% | 5.0 | 21.3% | 10.4% | 10.9% | 2.9% | 5.31 | 4.31 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 35 | 1 | 56 | 254 | 75 | 27 | 6 | 3% | 1.6 | 24.3% | 10.1% | 14.2% | 2.7% | 4.50 | 3.83 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 35 | 1 | 56 | 254 | 75 | 27 | 6 | 3% | 1.6 | 24.3% | 10.1% | 14.2% | 2.7% | 4.50 | 3.83 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 35 | 1 | 56 | 254 | 75 | 27 | 6 | 3% | 1.6 | 29.5% | 10.6% | 18.9% | 2.4% | 4.50 | 3.26 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | ARI | 3 | 3 | 16 | 68 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 100% | 5.3 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 10.8% | 3.0% | 4.63 | 4.63 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | ARI | 21 | 21 | 131 | 554 | 114 | 53 | 17 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.6% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 3.1% | 4.62 | 4.63 | +1.2 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | ARI | 19 | 19 | 116 | 491 | 101 | 47 | 15 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.6% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 3.2% | 4.65 | 4.69 | +0.9 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB MLE | ARI | 17 | 17 | 106 | 447 | 91 | 44 | 15 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.4% | 9.8% | 10.7% | 3.3% | 4.73 | 4.80 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB MLE | ARI | 15 | 15 | 96 | 404 | 81 | 40 | 14 | 100% | 6.4 | 20.1% | 10.0% | 10.1% | 3.5% | 4.86 | 4.96 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 31 | MLB MLE | ARI | 14 | 14 | 85 | 360 | 71 | 37 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.7% | 10.3% | 9.4% | 3.7% | 5.04 | 5.16 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | ARI | 9 | 9 | 56 | 236 | 49 | 23 | 7 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.6% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 2.9% | 4.53 | 4.54 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | ARI | 12 | 12 | 73 | 308 | 64 | 30 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.6% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 3.0% | 4.55 | 4.59 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB CTX | ARI | 12 | 12 | 77 | 325 | 66 | 32 | 10 | 100% | 6.4 | 20.4% | 9.8% | 10.7% | 3.1% | 4.63 | 4.70 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB CTX | ARI | 12 | 12 | 76 | 321 | 65 | 32 | 11 | 100% | 6.3 | 20.1% | 10.0% | 10.1% | 3.3% | 4.75 | 4.85 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 31 | MLB CTX | ARI | 12 | 12 | 72 | 304 | 60 | 31 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.7% | 10.3% | 9.4% | 3.5% | 4.93 | 5.05 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 57 | 57 | 354 | 1495 | 303 | 148 | 47 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.3% | 9.9% | 10.4% | 3.2% | 4.69 | 4.38 | +4.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 32 | 32 | 200 | 844 | 171 | 84 | 27 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.3% | 9.9% | 10.4% | 3.2% | 4.69 | 4.38 | +2.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 120 | 81 | 465 | 2048 | 403 | 229 | 54 | 68% | 3.9 | 19.7% | 11.2% | 8.5% | 2.7% | 4.33 | 4.31 | +3.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 52 | 35 | 200 | 880 | 173 | 98 | 23 | 68% | 3.9 | 19.7% | 11.2% | 8.5% | 2.7% | 4.33 | 4.31 | +1.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAReno Aces · 53 IPFIP 3.50 → 3.83 (+0.33)K% 28.2% → 24.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.22% | — | ×0.860 | 24.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.20% | — | ×0.900 | 10.08% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.49% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 2.74% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.50 → 3.83, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAReno Aces · 79 IPFIP 4.76 → 5.22 (+0.46)K% 19.3% → 16.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.30% | — | ×0.860 | 16.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.06% | — | ×0.900 | 10.86% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.22% | ÷0.904 | ×1.100 | 3.91% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 81).
Result: FIP 4.76 → 5.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 56 IPFIP 3.40 → 3.75 (+0.35)K% 24.4% → 19.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.38% | — | ×0.810 | 19.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.85% | — | ×1.100 | 8.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.48% | ÷1.333 | ×1.200 | 2.23% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 167).
Result: FIP 3.40 → 3.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 81 IPFIP 3.68 → 4.15 (+0.47)K% 24.5% → 19.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.51% | — | ×0.810 | 19.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.73% | — | ×1.100 | 9.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.82% | ÷1.229 | ×1.200 | 2.75% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 146).
Result: FIP 3.68 → 4.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Hillsboro Hops · 60 IPFIP 1.85 → 2.72 (+0.87)K% 28.8% → 22.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.76% | — | ×0.770 | 22.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.58% | — | ×1.150 | 6.42% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.86% | ÷0.875 | ×1.250 | 1.23% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 75).
Result: FIP 1.85 → 2.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Hillsboro Hops · 117 IPFIP 3.76 → 4.78 (+1.01)K% 23.7% → 18.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.71% | — | ×0.770 | 18.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.58% | — | ×1.150 | 15.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.72% | ÷0.952 | ×1.250 | 2.26% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.76 → 4.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AVisalia Rawhide · 13 IPFIP 4.43 → 5.80 (+1.37)K% 28.1% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.07% | — | ×0.740 | 20.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.04% | — | ×1.180 | 16.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.51% | ÷1.062 | ×1.300 | 4.30% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 4.43 → 5.80, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.5 | 116 | 20.4% | 9.8% | 1.25 | 4.73 |
| John Maine ('13) | 3.0 | 99 | 19.5% | 10.5% | 1.23 | 4.45 |
| Ken Kravec ('75-'82, 5 WAR*) | 4.3 | 123 | 23.6%* | 10.7%* | 1.11* | 4.73* |
| James Kaprielian ('23) | 1.6 | 106 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 1.30 | 4.61 |
| Ian Snell ('10) | 4.0 | 134 | 17.8% | 10.4% | 1.12 | 4.80 |
| Brian Kingman ('79-'83, 3 WAR*) | 2.8 | 138 | 18.4%* | 8.6%* | 1.10* | 4.62* |
| Jeff Robinson ('87-'92, 0 WAR*) | 3.5 | 118 | 18.3%* | 10.9%* | 1.38* | 5.14* |