Enderson Delgado
C FCL Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | A/ROK/INTL2 orgs | 381 | .243/.366/.364 | 6 | 1 | 74 | — | .203/.306/.320 |
| 2025 | 20 | ADET | 122 | .167/.286/.235 | 2 | 0 | 18 | — | .133/.235/.200 |
| 2026 | 21 | A+/A/ROKDET | 196 | .237/.335/.331 | 3 | 2 | 39 | — | .176/.253/.239 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 22 | MLBDET | 306 | .191/.264/.290 | 5 | 5 | 57 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 23 | MLBDET | 53 | .193/.266/.297 | 1 | 1 | 63 | -0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ46% MLB | 24 | MLBDET | 108 | .197/.271/.307 | 2 | 2 | 67 | 0.0 |
Tools · ContractCON 44 / POW 42
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 17 | ROK | DSL Rays | — | 119 | 101 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 218 | 331 | 248 | 578 | 30 | 272 | 18 | 9 | 278 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 35 | 29 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 103 | 257 | 172 | 430 | 69 | 167 | 31 | 9 | 222 | -2 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 151 | 129 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 36 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 163 | 285 | 279 | 564 | 116 | 200 | 24 | 13 | 266 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 235 | 192 | 49 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 54 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 255 | 384 | 391 | 774 | 135 | 333 | 23 | 12 | 352 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 34 | 28 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 286 | 394 | 464 | 858 | 179 | 333 | 15 | 12 | 371 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | INTL | Perth Heat | — | 112 | 93 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 28 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 204 | 321 | 280 | 601 | 75 | 258 | 25 | 10 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 122 | 102 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 167 | 286 | 235 | 521 | 69 | 211 | 26 | 11 | 247 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 23 | 22 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 182 | 217 | 227 | 445 | 45 | 267 | 30 | 4 | 204 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 56 | 50 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 240 | 321 | 320 | 641 | 80 | 316 | 21 | 9 | 296 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 117 | 97 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 247 | 365 | 361 | 726 | 113 | 259 | 13 | 11 | 331 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 119 | 105 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 26 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 143 | 237 | 162 | 399 | 19 | 179 | 22 | 6 | 182 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 35 | 30 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 229 | 167 | 395 | 67 | 150 | 43 | 6 | 165 | -2 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 151 | 135 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 52 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 104 | 199 | 170 | 369 | 67 | 150 | 34 | 9 | 179 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 235 | 201 | 41 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 74 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 204 | 310 | 318 | 629 | 114 | 292 | 31 | 8 | 278 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 34 | 30 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 273 | 333 | 606 | 133 | 254 | 21 | 6 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 122 | 105 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 44 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 133 | 235 | 200 | 435 | 67 | 177 | 36 | 8 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 23 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 136 | 174 | 182 | 356 | 45 | 241 | 39 | 4 | 157 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 56 | 52 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 192 | 250 | 250 | 500 | 58 | 281 | 29 | 5 | 229 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 117 | 102 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 176 | 270 | 245 | 515 | 69 | 193 | 19 | 7 | 238 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 119 | 105 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 26 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 143 | 237 | 162 | 399 | 19 | 188 | 22 | 6 | 182 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays | — | 119 | 101 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 218 | 331 | 248 | 578 | 30 | 272 | 18 | 9 | 278 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 186 | 165 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 67 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 103 | 204 | 170 | 374 | 67 | 156 | 36 | 8 | 176 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 186 | 158 | 24 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 47 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 152 | 280 | 259 | 539 | 108 | 194 | 25 | 12 | 258 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 381 | 326 | 67 | 19 | 1 | 5 | 30 | 116 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 206 | 307 | 316 | 623 | 110 | 295 | 30 | 8 | 277 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A RAW | 3 teams | — | 381 | 313 | 76 | 18 | 1 | 6 | 43 | 87 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 243 | 366 | 364 | 731 | 121 | 311 | 23 | 11 | 332 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 122 | 105 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 44 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 133 | 235 | 200 | 435 | 67 | 194 | 36 | 8 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 122 | 102 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 167 | 286 | 235 | 521 | 69 | 211 | 26 | 11 | 247 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK MLE | 3 teams | — | 196 | 176 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 47 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 176 | 253 | 239 | 491 | 62 | 225 | 24 | 6 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK RAW | 3 teams | — | 196 | 169 | 40 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 34 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 237 | 335 | 331 | 666 | 95 | 276 | 17 | 10 | 306 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 119 | 105 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 26 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 143 | 237 | 162 | 399 | 19 | 179 | 22 | 6 | 182 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 186 | 163 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 67 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 104 | 204 | 172 | 376 | 67 | 150 | 36 | 8 | 176 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 381 | 330 | 67 | 19 | 1 | 5 | 30 | 116 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 203 | 307 | 312 | 620 | 109 | 287 | 30 | 8 | 277 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 122 | 107 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 44 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 131 | 235 | 196 | 432 | 65 | 177 | 36 | 8 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK MLE | 3 teams | — | 196 | 176 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 47 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 176 | 253 | 239 | 491 | 62 | 224 | 24 | 6 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 381 | 330 | 67 | 19 | 1 | 5 | 30 | 116 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 203 | 307 | 312 | 620 | 109 | 287 | 30 | 8 | 277 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 122 | 107 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 44 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 131 | 235 | 196 | 432 | 65 | 177 | 36 | 8 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK MLE | 3 teams | — | 196 | 176 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 47 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 176 | 253 | 239 | 491 | 62 | 224 | 24 | 6 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB MLE | DET | 0% | 306 | 276 | 53 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 73 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 191 | 264 | 290 | 553 | 98 | 239 | 24 | 7 | 253 | 57 | -16 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +7 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | DET | 34% | 154 | 139 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 36 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 197 | 269 | 304 | 573 | 107 | 243 | 23 | 7 | 261 | 63 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +3 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB MLE | DET | 46% | 233 | 210 | 42 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 54 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 201 | 274 | 314 | 588 | 113 | 246 | 23 | 7 | 267 | 67 | -9 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +5 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB MLE | DET | 52% | 294 | 265 | 54 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 68 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 204 | 277 | 320 | 597 | 117 | 248 | 23 | 7 | 271 | 69 | -11 | +0 | +0 | +5 | +6 | 0.1 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 54% | 338 | 304 | 62 | 12 | 1 | 7 | 26 | 78 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 205 | 279 | 324 | 603 | 119 | 250 | 23 | 8 | 273 | 71 | -12 | +1 | +0 | +6 | +7 | 0.2 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 54% | 357 | 322 | 65 | 13 | 1 | 7 | 27 | 83 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 206 | 280 | 326 | 606 | 119 | 252 | 23 | 8 | 274 | 72 | -12 | +1 | +0 | +6 | +8 | 0.3 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 54% | 364 | 328 | 66 | 13 | 1 | 7 | 28 | 85 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 205 | 278 | 321 | 599 | 116 | 251 | 23 | 8 | 271 | 70 | -13 | +0 | -1 | +7 | +8 | 0.1 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 53% | 359 | 324 | 65 | 13 | 1 | 7 | 27 | 85 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 202 | 275 | 315 | 590 | 113 | 249 | 24 | 8 | 268 | 67 | -14 | +0 | -1 | +6 | +8 | -0.1 |
| 2035 | 30 | MLB MLE | DET | 52% | 351 | 317 | 63 | 12 | 1 | 7 | 26 | 84 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 199 | 271 | 307 | 578 | 108 | 247 | 24 | 7 | 263 | 64 | -15 | -0 | -2 | +6 | +8 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | DET | 34% | 53 | 48 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 193 | 266 | 297 | 563 | 104 | 239 | 23 | 8 | 257 | 63 | -2 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +1 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB CTX | DET | 46% | 108 | 97 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 197 | 271 | 307 | 577 | 109 | 242 | 23 | 7 | 263 | 67 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +2 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB CTX | DET | 52% | 152 | 138 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 35 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 200 | 274 | 313 | 586 | 113 | 244 | 23 | 7 | 266 | 69 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +3 | 0.0 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 54% | 183 | 164 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 42 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 202 | 276 | 316 | 592 | 115 | 246 | 23 | 8 | 269 | 71 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +4 | 0.1 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 54% | 194 | 174 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 45 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 203 | 277 | 318 | 595 | 115 | 248 | 23 | 8 | 270 | 72 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +4 | 0.1 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 54% | 198 | 178 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 46 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 201 | 275 | 313 | 588 | 113 | 247 | 23 | 8 | 267 | 70 | -7 | +0 | -0 | +4 | +4 | 0.0 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 53% | 191 | 171 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 45 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 198 | 272 | 307 | 579 | 109 | 245 | 24 | 8 | 264 | 67 | -7 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +4 | -0.0 |
| 2035 | 30 | MLB CTX | DET | 52% | 184 | 165 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 44 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 195 | 268 | 300 | 568 | 104 | 243 | 24 | 8 | 259 | 64 | -8 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +4 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1263 | 1135 | 227 | 44 | 6 | 25 | 96 | 294 | 20 | 15 | 4 | 200 | 274 | 315 | 590 | 115 | 245 | 23 | 8 | 265 | 60 | -47 | +1 | -2 | +23 | +27 | 0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 584 | 117 | 23 | 3 | 13 | 49 | 151 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 200 | 274 | 317 | 590 | 116 | 245 | 23 | 8 | 265 | 60 | -24 | +1 | -1 | +12 | +14 | 0.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3567 | 3188 | 608 | 121 | 10 | 62 | 266 | 900 | 79 | 36 | 12 | 191 | 270 | 293 | 563 | 103 | 243 | 25 | 7 | 257 | 60 | -98 | +3 | -4 | +46 | +56 | 0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 581 | 111 | 22 | 2 | 11 | 48 | 164 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 191 | 269 | 293 | 562 | 102 | 243 | 25 | 7 | 257 | 60 | -25 | +1 | -1 | +12 | +14 | 0.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Tigers · 117 PAwOBA .329 → .238 (−91)K% 12.8% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.82% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 18.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.975 | 6.72% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.27% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 3.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.17% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×0.975 | 17.60% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.44% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×0.975 | 1.63% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.66% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.975 | 2.78% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .329 → .238; ISO .113 → .086; BABIP .259 → .193. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 56 PAwOBA .289 → .229 (−60)K% 21.4% → 29.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.43% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 29.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.93% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | — | 6.16% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.79% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.39% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.05% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | — | 19.37% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.53% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | — | 8.74% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .289 → .229; ISO .080 → .062; BABIP .316 → .281. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 23 PAwOBA .199 → .157 (−42)K% 30.4% → 38.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.43% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 38.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.35% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 3.12% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.012 | 18.62% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | — | ×1.012 | 5.46% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .199 → .157; ISO .045 → .033; BABIP .267 → .241. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 122 PAwOBA .247 → .195 (−53)K% 26.2% → 35.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.23% | ÷0.998 | ×1.360 | — | — | 35.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.66% | ÷0.945 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 7.90% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.28% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 2.60% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷1.051 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.015 | 16.88% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.43% | ÷0.971 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×1.015 | 1.18% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.86% | ÷0.864 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 2.69% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 110, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 100, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .247 → .195; ISO .069 → .059; BABIP .211 → .177. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ACharleston RiverDogs · 235 PAwOBA .345 → .278 (−67)K% 23.0% → 31.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.98% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 31.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.91% | ÷1.047 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 8.09% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.11% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 4.10% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.46% | ÷1.071 | ×0.920 | ×1.007 | ×1.030 | 20.01% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.14% | ÷1.017 | ×0.830 | ×1.007 | ×1.030 | 8.59% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.099 | ×0.910 | ×1.007 | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.90% | ÷0.824 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 2.90% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 65, 1B 114, 2B 103, 3B 120, K 97, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.007.
Result: wOBA .345 → .278; ISO .135 → .119; BABIP .333 → .292. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Rays · 34 PAwOBA .373 → .271 (−102)K% 14.7% → 21.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.71% | ÷0.980 | ×1.440 | — | — | 21.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.76% | ÷1.024 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 7.08% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.94% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 2.11% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.39% | ÷1.024 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.995 | 13.86% |
| Doubles /BIP | 13.04% | ÷0.941 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 9.93% |
| Triples /BIP | 4.35% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 2.71% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.002 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 105, 2B 88, 3B 130, K 96, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .373 → .271; ISO .179 → .129; BABIP .333 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Rays · 151 PAwOBA .260 → .179 (−81)K% 23.8% → 34.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.84% | ÷0.999 | ×1.440 | — | — | 34.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.58% | ÷0.948 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 8.29% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.99% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 1.44% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.05% | ÷0.996 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 11.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.15% | ÷1.020 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 1.45% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.15% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 1.29% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.23% | ÷0.911 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 2.78% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 82, 1B 99, 2B 104, 3B 130, K 100, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .260 → .179; ISO .116 → .081; BABIP .200 → .150. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ACharleston RiverDogs · 35 PAwOBA .217 → .165 (−52)K% 31.4% → 43.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.43% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 43.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.57% | ÷1.035 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.045 | 5.97% |
| HBP% /PA | 8.57% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.045 | 6.99% |
| Singles /BIP | 5.56% | ÷1.071 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.045 | 4.99% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.11% | ÷0.964 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.045 | 10.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.938 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.045 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.075 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.045 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 115, 1B 114, 2B 93, 3B 88, K 97, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .217 → .165; ISO .069 → .053; BABIP .167 → .150. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .