Rodney Green Jr.
CF Lansing Lugnuts| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | AOAK | 114 | .289/.378/.464 | 3 | 9 | 84 | — | .238/.306/.366 |
| 2025 | 22 | A+/AOAK | 507 | .194/.306/.350 | 13 | 16 | 32 | — | .141/.226/.245 |
| 2026 | 23 | A+OAK | 451 | .228/.343/.366 | 9 | 12 | 53 | — | .178/.267/.270 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBOAK | 1 | .164/.249/.266 | 0 | 0 | 44 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 25 | MLBOAK | 79 | .169/.254/.278 | 1 | 1 | 48 | -0.3 |
Tools · ContractCON 20 / POW 35
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 114 | 97 | 28 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 30 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 289 | 378 | 464 | 842 | 175 | 373 | 26 | 11 | 366 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 355 | 303 | 48 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 48 | 118 | 3 | 11 | 5 | 158 | 280 | 287 | 567 | 129 | 229 | 33 | 14 | 265 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 152 | 131 | 36 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 16 | 31 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 275 | 367 | 496 | 863 | 221 | 312 | 20 | 11 | 375 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 451 | 382 | 87 | 20 | 3 | 9 | 64 | 159 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 228 | 343 | 366 | 709 | 139 | 363 | 35 | 14 | 323 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 114 | 101 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 40 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 238 | 306 | 366 | 673 | 129 | 338 | 35 | 8 | 293 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 355 | 318 | 32 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 33 | 155 | 3 | 11 | 5 | 101 | 192 | 179 | 371 | 79 | 174 | 44 | 9 | 180 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 152 | 136 | 32 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 42 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 235 | 307 | 397 | 704 | 162 | 286 | 28 | 7 | 298 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 451 | 400 | 71 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 46 | 202 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 177 | 267 | 270 | 537 | 93 | 334 | 45 | 10 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 114 | 101 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 40 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 238 | 306 | 366 | 673 | 129 | 355 | 35 | 8 | 293 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A RAW | Stockton Ports | — | 114 | 97 | 28 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 30 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 289 | 378 | 464 | 842 | 175 | 373 | 26 | 11 | 366 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 507 | 454 | 65 | 14 | 3 | 10 | 44 | 196 | 6 | 16 | 5 | 143 | 228 | 253 | 481 | 110 | 219 | 39 | 9 | 215 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 507 | 434 | 84 | 21 | 4 | 13 | 64 | 149 | 6 | 16 | 5 | 194 | 306 | 350 | 656 | 157 | 258 | 29 | 13 | 298 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 451 | 400 | 71 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 46 | 202 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 177 | 267 | 270 | 537 | 93 | 337 | 45 | 10 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ RAW | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 451 | 382 | 87 | 20 | 3 | 9 | 64 | 159 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 228 | 343 | 366 | 709 | 139 | 363 | 35 | 14 | 323 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 114 | 103 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 40 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 233 | 306 | 359 | 666 | 126 | 338 | 35 | 8 | 293 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 507 | 452 | 65 | 14 | 3 | 10 | 44 | 196 | 6 | 16 | 5 | 144 | 228 | 254 | 483 | 111 | 208 | 39 | 9 | 215 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 451 | 399 | 71 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 46 | 202 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 178 | 267 | 271 | 538 | 93 | 334 | 45 | 10 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 114 | 103 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 40 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 233 | 306 | 359 | 666 | 126 | 338 | 35 | 8 | 293 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 507 | 452 | 65 | 14 | 3 | 10 | 44 | 196 | 6 | 16 | 5 | 144 | 228 | 254 | 483 | 111 | 208 | 39 | 9 | 215 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 451 | 399 | 71 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 46 | 202 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 178 | 267 | 271 | 538 | 93 | 334 | 45 | 10 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | OAK | 0% | 380 | 339 | 53 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 35 | 157 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 159 | 244 | 258 | 502 | 99 | 266 | 41 | 9 | 233 | 44 | -26 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +8 | -0.9 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB CTX | OAK | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 164 | 249 | 266 | 515 | 102 | 276 | 0 | 0 | 238 | 44 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | OAK | 30% | 260 | 232 | 38 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 24 | 105 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 164 | 250 | 270 | 520 | 106 | 268 | 40 | 9 | 239 | 48 | -16 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +6 | -0.9 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | OAK | 30% | 79 | 71 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 169 | 254 | 278 | 532 | 109 | 278 | 41 | 9 | 245 | 48 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +2 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 79 | 71 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 155 | 241 | 239 | 480 | 85 | 263 | 41 | 9 | 245 | 46 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +2 | -0.3 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 584 | 91 | 25 | 0 | 8 | 58 | 263 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 156 | 242 | 240 | 481 | 84 | 265 | 40 | 9 | 245 | 46 | -40 | +2 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -2.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1542 | 1373 | 227 | 50 | 7 | 26 | 143 | 630 | 14 | 46 | 12 | 165 | 251 | 269 | 520 | 103 | 277 | 41 | 9 | 236 | 46 | -30 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +10 | -1.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 579 | 96 | 21 | 3 | 11 | 60 | 266 | 6 | 19 | 5 | 166 | 251 | 269 | 521 | 104 | 278 | 41 | 9 | 236 | 46 | -42 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -2.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 451 PAwOBA .316 → .246 (−70)K% 35.3% → 44.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 35.25% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 44.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.19% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 10.06% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.67% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 0.52% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.66% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.047 | ×0.998 | 23.70% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.97% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.047 | ×0.998 | 7.59% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.35% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.047 | ×0.998 | 1.19% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.04% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 3.22% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.047.
Result: wOBA .316 → .246; ISO .139 → .104; BABIP .363 → .334. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 355 PAwOBA .260 → .180 (−79)K% 33.2% → 43.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 33.24% | ÷0.969 | ×1.270 | — | — | 43.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.52% | ÷1.048 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 9.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.85% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 0.68% |
| Singles /BIP | 13.51% | ÷1.078 | ×0.920 | ×0.957 | ×1.012 | 11.17% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.57% | ÷1.199 | ×0.810 | ×0.957 | ×1.012 | 4.95% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.08% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×0.957 | ×1.012 | 0.77% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.78% | ÷0.921 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 3.33% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 116, 2B 140, 3B 130, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.957.
Result: wOBA .260 → .180; ISO .129 → .090; BABIP .229 → .174. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AStockton Ports · 152 PAwOBA .370 → .298 (−73)K% 20.4% → 27.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.39% | ÷1.011 | ×1.360 | — | — | 27.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.53% | ÷1.029 | ×0.690 | — | — | 7.06% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.97% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.54% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.00% | ÷1.003 | ×0.920 | ×1.046 | — | 20.14% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.00% | ÷0.990 | ×0.830 | ×1.046 | — | 6.13% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.046 | — | 1.66% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.00% | ÷1.113 | ×0.800 | — | — | 4.31% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 101, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 102, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.046.
Result: wOBA .370 → .298; ISO .221 → .166; BABIP .312 → .286. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AStockton Ports · 114 PAwOBA .366 → .293 (−73)K% 26.3% → 35.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.32% | ÷1.015 | ×1.360 | — | — | 35.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.40% | ÷1.021 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 7.82% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.88% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.69% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.37% | ÷1.004 | ×0.920 | ×1.013 | ×1.015 | 23.93% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.94% | ÷0.979 | ×0.830 | ×1.013 | ×1.015 | 10.41% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×1.013 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.48% | ÷1.164 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 3.12% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 133, 1B 101, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 103, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.013.
Result: wOBA .366 → .293; ISO .175 → .131; BABIP .373 → .338. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).