Ali Camarillo
SS Lansing Lugnuts| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22 | A+/AOAK | 411 | .255/.334/.313 | 1 | 18 | 48 | — | .217/.275/.265 |
| 2026 | 23 | AA/A+/AOAK | 591 | .308/.387/.442 | 9 | 29 | 94 | — | .270/.331/.377 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBOAK | 1 | .241/.300/.335 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ28% MLB | 25 | MLBOAK | 72 | .244/.304/.348 | 1 | 2 | 79 | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ43% MLB | 26 | MLBOAK | 132 | .245/.306/.356 | 2 | 3 | 82 | 0.3 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 57 | 50 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 260 | 339 | 280 | 619 | 20 | 295 | 11 | 11 | 286 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 354 | 311 | 79 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 62 | 5 | 15 | 3 | 254 | 333 | 318 | 652 | 64 | 308 | 18 | 9 | 297 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA | Midland RockHounds | — | 106 | 93 | 34 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 366 | 443 | 505 | 949 | 140 | 434 | 15 | 12 | 423 | 128 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 389 | 342 | 97 | 23 | 0 | 5 | 32 | 56 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 284 | 359 | 395 | 753 | 111 | 323 | 14 | 8 | 336 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 96 | 81 | 28 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 22 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 346 | 436 | 568 | 1.004 | 222 | 431 | 23 | 9 | 432 | 119 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 57 | 52 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 231 | 286 | 250 | 536 | 19 | 251 | 14 | 7 | 229 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 354 | 322 | 69 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 84 | 5 | 15 | 3 | 214 | 273 | 267 | 540 | 53 | 273 | 24 | 6 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | Midland RockHounds | — | 106 | 97 | 32 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 330 | 387 | 454 | 840 | 124 | 397 | 19 | 8 | 358 | 128 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 389 | 351 | 88 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 23 | 71 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 251 | 312 | 339 | 651 | 88 | 292 | 18 | 6 | 284 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 96 | 85 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 30 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 282 | 351 | 447 | 798 | 165 | 372 | 31 | 5 | 344 | 119 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 411 | 374 | 81 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 91 | 5 | 18 | 5 | 217 | 275 | 265 | 539 | 48 | 279 | 22 | 6 | 238 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 411 | 361 | 92 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 68 | 5 | 18 | 5 | 255 | 334 | 313 | 647 | 58 | 306 | 17 | 9 | 295 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 591 | 533 | 143 | 33 | 1 | 7 | 37 | 121 | 12 | 29 | 3 | 268 | 330 | 373 | 703 | 105 | 331 | 20 | 6 | 307 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ RAW | 3 teams | — | 591 | 516 | 159 | 40 | 1 | 9 | 54 | 94 | 12 | 29 | 3 | 308 | 387 | 442 | 828 | 134 | 358 | 16 | 9 | 367 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 411 | 378 | 81 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 91 | 5 | 18 | 5 | 214 | 275 | 262 | 537 | 48 | 270 | 22 | 6 | 238 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 591 | 537 | 143 | 33 | 1 | 7 | 37 | 121 | 12 | 29 | 3 | 266 | 330 | 371 | 700 | 104 | 324 | 20 | 6 | 307 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 411 | 378 | 81 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 91 | 5 | 18 | 5 | 214 | 275 | 262 | 537 | 48 | 270 | 22 | 6 | 238 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 591 | 537 | 143 | 33 | 1 | 7 | 37 | 121 | 12 | 29 | 3 | 266 | 330 | 371 | 700 | 104 | 324 | 20 | 6 | 307 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | OAK | 0% | 380 | 348 | 82 | 18 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 77 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 234 | 293 | 322 | 615 | 89 | 286 | 20 | 6 | 279 | 75 | -11 | +1 | +3 | +4 | +8 | 0.4 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB CTX | OAK | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 241 | 300 | 335 | 635 | 94 | 296 | 0 | 0 | 287 | 75 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | OAK | 28% | 260 | 237 | 56 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 53 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 236 | 297 | 335 | 632 | 99 | 287 | 20 | 7 | 285 | 79 | -6 | +1 | +2 | +3 | +6 | 0.5 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | OAK | 43% | 305 | 278 | 67 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 62 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 238 | 299 | 343 | 642 | 106 | 287 | 20 | 7 | 289 | 82 | -7 | +1 | +2 | +3 | +7 | 0.7 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | OAK | 50% | 321 | 292 | 70 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 66 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 237 | 299 | 344 | 643 | 107 | 287 | 21 | 7 | 290 | 82 | -7 | +1 | +3 | +3 | +7 | 0.7 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | OAK | 54% | 328 | 299 | 71 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 68 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 236 | 298 | 343 | 641 | 107 | 287 | 21 | 7 | 289 | 82 | -7 | +1 | +2 | +4 | +7 | 0.6 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | OAK | 55% | 321 | 292 | 68 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 68 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 234 | 297 | 340 | 637 | 106 | 286 | 21 | 7 | 287 | 80 | -7 | +1 | +1 | +3 | +7 | 0.5 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | OAK | 56% | 314 | 286 | 67 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 68 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 231 | 293 | 333 | 626 | 102 | 284 | 22 | 7 | 283 | 78 | -8 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +7 | 0.3 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | OAK | 28% | 72 | 66 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 244 | 304 | 348 | 652 | 104 | 297 | 21 | 7 | 293 | 79 | -2 | +0 | +1 | +1 | +2 | 0.2 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | OAK | 43% | 132 | 120 | 29 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 27 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 245 | 306 | 356 | 661 | 111 | 297 | 20 | 7 | 297 | 82 | -3 | +0 | +1 | +1 | +3 | 0.3 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | OAK | 50% | 161 | 147 | 35 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 33 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 244 | 306 | 356 | 662 | 112 | 297 | 20 | 7 | 297 | 82 | -3 | +0 | +1 | +2 | +3 | 0.4 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | OAK | 54% | 178 | 162 | 39 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 37 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 243 | 305 | 355 | 660 | 112 | 297 | 21 | 7 | 297 | 82 | -4 | +0 | +1 | +2 | +4 | 0.3 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | OAK | 55% | 178 | 162 | 39 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 38 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 241 | 303 | 352 | 656 | 111 | 296 | 21 | 7 | 295 | 80 | -4 | +0 | +1 | +2 | +4 | 0.3 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | OAK | 56% | 176 | 160 | 39 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 38 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 238 | 300 | 345 | 645 | 106 | 294 | 22 | 7 | 290 | 78 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +4 | 0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 897 | 817 | 197 | 46 | 0 | 14 | 61 | 188 | 11 | 18 | 5 | 241 | 303 | 349 | 651 | 108 | 295 | 21 | 7 | 295 | 78 | -21 | +2 | +5 | +10 | +19 | 1.5 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 592 | 142 | 33 | 0 | 10 | 44 | 136 | 8 | 13 | 4 | 240 | 301 | 346 | 648 | 106 | 293 | 21 | 7 | 295 | 78 | -15 | +1 | +3 | +7 | +14 | 1.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3061 | 2783 | 668 | 140 | 8 | 38 | 199 | 639 | 44 | 89 | 15 | 240 | 301 | 337 | 638 | 97 | 296 | 21 | 7 | 284 | 78 | -49 | +6 | +12 | +22 | +45 | 3.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 591 | 142 | 30 | 2 | 8 | 42 | 136 | 9 | 19 | 3 | 240 | 301 | 338 | 639 | 98 | 296 | 21 | 6 | 284 | 78 | -16 | +2 | +4 | +7 | +14 | 1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 389 PAwOBA .330 → .284 (−46)K% 14.4% → 18.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.40% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 18.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.23% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 5.83% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.06% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 1.62% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.13% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.019 | ×0.998 | 22.57% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.04% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.019 | ×0.998 | 6.62% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.019 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.75% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 1.40% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.019.
Result: wOBA .330 → .284; ISO .111 → .091; BABIP .323 → .292. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAMidland RockHounds · 106 PAwOBA .412 → .358 (−54)K% 15.1% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.09% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 18.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.027 | 8.82% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.87% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.997 | ×1.027 | 28.13% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.99% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×0.997 | ×1.027 | 11.17% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.940 | ×0.997 | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.30% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 1.07% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.
Result: wOBA .412 → .358; ISO .140 → .119; BABIP .434 → .397. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AStockton Ports · 96 PAwOBA .426 → .344 (−83)K% 22.9% → 31.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.92% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 31.17% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 5.69% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.17% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 3.22% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.81% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.986 | ×0.990 | 25.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.986 | ×0.990 | 9.61% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.986 | ×0.990 | 1.51% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 4.03% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.986.
Result: wOBA .426 → .344; ISO .222 → .175; BABIP .431 → .372. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AStockton Ports · 354 PAwOBA .293 → .240 (−52)K% 17.5% → 23.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.51% | ÷1.011 | ×1.360 | — | — | 23.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.76% | ÷1.029 | ×0.690 | — | — | 5.87% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.41% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.10% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.90% | ÷1.003 | ×0.920 | ×0.985 | — | 22.49% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.02% | ÷0.990 | ×0.830 | ×0.985 | — | 4.97% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.40% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×0.985 | — | 0.31% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.40% | ÷1.113 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.29% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 101, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 102, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.985.
Result: wOBA .293 → .240; ISO .064 → .051; BABIP .308 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 57 PAwOBA .280 → .229 (−51)K% 10.5% → 13.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.53% | ÷0.969 | ×1.270 | — | — | 13.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.53% | ÷1.048 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 7.22% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.27% | ÷1.078 | ×0.920 | ×0.999 | ×1.012 | 23.52% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.27% | ÷1.199 | ×0.810 | ×0.999 | ×1.012 | 1.55% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×0.999 | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.921 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 116, 2B 140, 3B 130, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.
Result: wOBA .280 → .229; ISO .020 → .014; BABIP .295 → .251. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).