Eduardo Soriano
P FCL Twins| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 20 | ROKMIN | 12 | 7 | 42 | 3.67 | 3.51 | 24.2% | 10.0% | — | K 16.5% · BB 12.5% · FIP 5.06 |
| 2024 | 21 | ROKMIN | 13 | 3 | 29 | 7.45 | 3.24 | 22.1% | 15.7% | — | K 15.1% · BB 19.6% · FIP 4.32 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBMIN | — | — | 0 | 4.80 | 4.80 | 22.7% | 12.6% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 25 | MLBMIN | 7 | 0 | 7 | 4.67 | 4.61 | 23.1% | 11.5% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Twins | 10 | 1 | 13 | 57 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 10% | 1.3 | 13.1% | 17.5% | -4.4% | 2.5% | 4.85 | 5.56 | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Twins | 10 | 1 | 13 | 57 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 10% | 1.3 | 19.3% | 14.0% | 5.3% | 1.8% | 4.85 | 4.25 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Twins | 11 | 1 | 25 | 105 | 19 | 7 | 3 | 9% | 2.3 | 12.3% | 8.3% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 2.13 | 5.24 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Twins | 11 | 1 | 25 | 105 | 19 | 7 | 3 | 9% | 2.3 | 18.1% | 6.7% | 11.4% | 2.9% | 2.13 | 3.97 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Twins | 12 | 7 | 42 | 190 | 46 | 19 | 4 | 58% | 3.5 | 16.5% | 12.5% | 4.0% | 3.2% | 3.67 | 5.06 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Twins | 12 | 7 | 42 | 190 | 46 | 19 | 4 | 58% | 3.5 | 24.2% | 10.0% | 14.2% | 2.1% | 3.67 | 3.51 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Twins | 13 | 3 | 29 | 140 | 31 | 22 | 0 | 23% | 2.2 | 15.1% | 19.6% | -4.6% | 0.0% | 7.45 | 4.32 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Twins | 13 | 3 | 29 | 140 | 31 | 22 | 0 | 23% | 2.2 | 15.1% | 19.6% | -4.6% | 0.0% | 7.45 | 4.32 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK RAW | FCL Twins | 13 | 3 | 29 | 140 | 31 | 22 | 0 | 23% | 2.2 | 22.1% | 15.7% | 6.4% | 0.0% | 7.45 | 3.24 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | MIN | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.7% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 3.0% | 4.80 | 4.80 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | MIN | 16 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.1% | 11.5% | 11.7% | 3.0% | 4.67 | 4.61 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | MIN | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.1% | 11.5% | 11.7% | 3.0% | 4.67 | 4.61 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 7 | 0 | 7 | 31 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.1% | 11.5% | 11.7% | 3.0% | 4.67 | 4.23 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 189 | 108 | 27 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.1% | 11.5% | 11.7% | 3.0% | 4.67 | 4.23 | +0.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 46 | 12 | 109 | 492 | 73 | 70 | 12 | 26% | 2.4 | 14.8% | 14.2% | 0.6% | 2.4% | 4.46 | 4.95 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 84 | 22 | 200 | 903 | 134 | 128 | 21 | 26% | 2.4 | 14.8% | 14.2% | 0.6% | 2.4% | 4.46 | 4.95 | -0.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 ROKFCL Twins · 29 IPFIP 3.22 → 4.32 (+1.10)K% 22.1% → 15.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.14% | — | ×0.680 | 15.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.71% | — | ×1.250 | 19.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.890 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 3.22 → 4.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Twins · 42 IPFIP 3.48 → 5.06 (+1.59)K% 24.2% → 16.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.21% | — | ×0.680 | 16.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×1.250 | 12.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.11% | ÷0.913 | ×1.400 | 3.23% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 3.48 → 5.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL Twins · 25 IPFIP 3.98 → 5.24 (+1.26)K% 18.1% → 12.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.10% | — | ×0.680 | 12.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.67% | — | ×1.250 | 8.33% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.86% | ÷1.032 | ×1.400 | 3.88% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 3.98 → 5.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKDSL Twins · 13 IPFIP 4.21 → 5.56 (+1.35)K% 19.3% → 13.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.30% | — | ×0.680 | 13.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.04% | — | ×1.250 | 17.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.75% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 2.46% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.21 → 5.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).