Josh Ekness
P Miami Marlins| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | MIX3 levels | 48 | 0 | 66 | 1.91 | 2.31 | 31.0% | 9.3% | — | K 23.2% · BB 11.1% · FIP 2.84 |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 46 | 0 | 54 | 4.17 | 2.45 | 27.5% | 10.1% | — | K 23.1% · BB 9.5% · FIP 2.35 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 45 | 0 | 52 | 3.48 | 3.29 | 25.7% | 10.8% | 0.8 | K 23.6% · BB 10.5% · FIP 3.51 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBMIA | 27 | 0 | 28 | 3.90 | 3.96 | 25.4% | 10.4% | 0.2 | |
| 2028PROJ80% MLB | 26 | MLBMIA | 28 | 0 | 29 | 3.96 | 3.98 | 25.4% | 10.2% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ84% MLB | 27 | MLBMIA | 27 | 0 | 28 | 4.02 | 4.04 | 25.3% | 10.2% | 0.2 |
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 7 | 0 | 9 | 46 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0% | 1.3 | 23.9% | 23.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.82 | 4.11 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 7 | 0 | 9 | 46 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0% | 1.3 | 23.9% | 23.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.82 | 4.28 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 48 | 0 | 66 | 268 | 83 | 25 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 23.2% | 11.1% | 12.1% | 0.5% | 1.91 | 2.84 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 48 | 0 | 66 | 268 | 83 | 25 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 23.2% | 11.1% | 12.1% | 0.5% | 1.91 | 2.84 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 48 | 0 | 66 | 268 | 83 | 25 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 31.0% | 9.3% | 21.6% | 1.1% | 1.91 | 2.31 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 46 | 0 | 54 | 247 | 68 | 25 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 23.1% | 9.5% | 13.6% | 0.0% | 4.17 | 2.35 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 46 | 0 | 54 | 247 | 68 | 25 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 23.1% | 9.5% | 13.6% | 0.0% | 4.17 | 2.35 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 46 | 0 | 54 | 247 | 68 | 25 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 27.5% | 10.1% | 17.4% | 0.8% | 4.17 | 2.45 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 45 | 0 | 52 | 222 | 57 | 24 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.6% | 10.5% | 13.1% | 1.9% | 3.48 | 3.51 | +0.6 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 45 | 0 | 52 | 222 | 57 | 24 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.6% | 10.5% | 13.1% | 1.9% | 3.48 | 3.51 | +0.6 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 45 | 0 | 52 | 222 | 57 | 24 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.7% | 10.8% | 14.9% | 1.8% | 3.48 | 3.29 | +0.8 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 30 | 0 | 31 | 134 | 24 | 18 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.9% | 13.4% | 4.5% | 1.5% | 3.23 | 4.14 | +0.1 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | MIA | 27 | 0 | 28 | 118 | 30 | 12 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.4% | 10.4% | 15.1% | 2.4% | 3.90 | 3.96 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | MIA | 35 | 0 | 36 | 154 | 39 | 16 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.4% | 10.2% | 15.2% | 2.5% | 3.96 | 3.98 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | MIA | 32 | 0 | 33 | 140 | 35 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.3% | 10.2% | 15.1% | 2.6% | 4.02 | 4.04 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | MIA | 28 | 0 | 29 | 122 | 31 | 13 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.4% | 10.2% | 15.2% | 2.5% | 3.96 | 3.98 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | MIA | 27 | 0 | 28 | 118 | 30 | 12 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.3% | 10.2% | 15.1% | 2.6% | 4.02 | 4.04 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 84 | 0 | 88 | 375 | 85 | 43 | 8 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.7% | 11.4% | 11.3% | 2.1% | 3.72 | 3.80 | +0.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 192 | 0 | 200 | 855 | 194 | 98 | 18 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.7% | 11.4% | 11.3% | 2.1% | 3.72 | 3.80 | +1.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 146 | 0 | 181 | 783 | 183 | 88 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 23.4% | 11.2% | 12.1% | 0.7% | 3.18 | 2.95 | +0.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 161 | 0 | 200 | 865 | 202 | 97 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 23.4% | 11.2% | 12.1% | 0.7% | 3.18 | 2.95 | +1.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 21 IPFIP 2.04 → 2.53 (+0.48)K% 37.5% → 32.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.50% | — | ×0.860 | 32.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.82% | — | ×0.900 | 6.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.27% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 2.50% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.04 → 2.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAPensacola Blue Wahoos · 53 IPFIP 1.78 → 2.35 (+0.57)K% 28.6% → 23.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.57% | — | ×0.810 | 23.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.66% | — | ×1.100 | 9.52% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.103 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).
Result: FIP 1.78 → 2.35, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Beloit Sky Carp · 49 IPFIP 2.38 → 3.21 (+0.83)K% 27.6% → 21.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.64% | — | ×0.770 | 21.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.55% | — | ×1.150 | 12.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.50% | ÷0.935 | ×1.250 | 0.67% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 2.38 → 3.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AJupiter Hammerheads · 13 IPFIP 0.31 → 1.37 (+1.06)K% 42.0% → 31.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 42.00% | — | ×0.740 | 31.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.00% | — | ×1.180 | 7.08% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.888 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 0.31 → 1.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AJupiter Hammerheads · 9 IPFIP 4.16 → 5.27 (+1.12)K% 25.0% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.740 | 18.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 25.00% | — | ×1.180 | 29.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.924 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 4.16 → 5.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.7 | 35 | 23.7% | 11.3% | 0.87 | 3.80 |
| Chaz Roe ('21) | 1.1 | 43 | 26.4% | 11.1% | 0.79 | 3.89 |
| José Cisnero ('24) | 1.4 | 46 | 24.0% | 11.3% | 1.01 | 4.16 |
| Ray Searage ('81-'90, 4 WAR*) | 1.4 | 41 | 21.0%* | 10.8%* | 0.84* | 3.70* |
| George Sherrill ('12) | 1.6 | 46 | 22.9% | 11.0% | 0.80 | 3.77 |
| Dave Geisel ('78-'85, 2 WAR*) | 1.0 | 42 | 23.5%* | 10.6%* | 0.84* | 4.12* |
| Ed Vosberg ('86-'02, 1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 47 | 21.0%* | 9.6%* | 0.86* | 4.06* |