Blake Goldsberry

P Albuquerque Isotopes
Age 30 RHP 6'4" / 220 lbs AAA
Overview
AAAPROSPECT
MLB%2%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202225MIX4 levels320412.432.9530.4%5.6%—K 23.6% · BB 8.3% · FIP 3.43
202326AACOL332443.864.3229.1%10.6%—K 23.6% · BB 11.6% · FIP 5.26
202427MIX2 levels191206.204.5816.3%12.2%—K 9.2% · BB 16.1% · FIP 5.34
202528No MLB games played
202629No MLB games played
2027PROJ30MLBCOL——04.694.6920.5%10.3%—
2028PROJ31% MLB31MLBCOL5054.784.8620.3%10.6%-0.0
Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsWirfin Obispo (age 30) · Joe Nelson (age 31) · Neil Wagner (age 29)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 122114vR 106
ERA4.69
FIP4.69
K%20.5%
BB%10.3%
K-BB%10.1%
Proj IP6
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 6 IP
K: -0.1 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-0KBB: -0.1 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-0BBCONTACT: -0.2 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-0CONTACTSTAM: +0.2 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+0STAMTotal WAR: -0.01 (6 IP)-0.0WAR
0.00.02728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
202124A MLEFresno Grizzlies2323213129939%1.416.4%8.1%8.3%2.4%3.064.09—
202124A RAWFresno Grizzlies2323213129939%1.422.1%6.9%15.3%2.3%3.063.35—
202225MIX MLE4 levels3204116149950%1.323.6%8.3%15.3%2.3%2.433.43—
202225MIX RAW4 levels3204116149950%1.330.4%5.6%24.8%3.1%2.432.95—
202326AA MLEHartford Yard Goats33244189552086%1.323.6%11.6%11.9%4.9%3.865.26—
202326AA RAWHartford Yard Goats33244189552086%1.329.1%10.6%18.5%4.2%3.864.32—
202427MIX MLE2 levels1912098161225%1.19.2%16.1%-6.9%1.8%6.205.34—
202427MIX MLE2 levels1912098161225%1.19.2%16.1%-6.9%1.8%6.205.34—
202427MIX RAW2 levels1912098161225%1.116.3%12.2%4.1%2.0%6.204.58—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202730MLBCOL——0——————20.5%10.3%10.1%3.0%4.694.69—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202831MLB MLECOL160177215820%1.120.3%10.6%9.8%3.2%4.784.86-0.1
202831MLB CTXCOL505214210%1.020.3%10.6%9.8%3.2%4.784.86-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW505225210%1.120.3%10.6%9.8%3.2%4.784.48+0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW190020084418875380%1.120.3%10.6%9.8%3.2%4.784.48+0.2
Career— MLE107513857911362185%1.319.5%10.7%8.8%3.1%3.604.50-0.1
/ 200 IP— MLE155720084116490265%1.319.5%10.7%8.8%3.1%3.604.50-0.7

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2024 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 10 IPFIP 5.44 → 5.34 (−0.10)K% 10.7% → 9.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF10.71%—×0.8609.21%
BB% (unintentional) /BF17.86%—×0.90016.07%
HR / BF /BF1.79%÷1.096×1.1001.79%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 119).

Result: FIP 5.44 → 5.34, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AAHartford Yard Goats · 11 IPFIP 3.00 → 3.85 (+0.85)K% 23.8% → 19.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.81%—×0.81019.29%
BB% (unintentional) /BF4.76%—×1.1005.24%
HR / BF /BF2.38%÷0.916×1.2003.12%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).

Result: FIP 3.00 → 3.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAHartford Yard Goats · 44 IPFIP 4.31 → 5.26 (+0.96)K% 29.1% → 23.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF29.10%—×0.81023.57%
BB% (unintentional) /BF10.58%—×1.10011.64%
HR / BF /BF4.23%÷1.040×1.2004.88%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).

Result: FIP 4.31 → 5.26, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 A+Spokane Indians · 31 IPFIP 2.76 → 3.43 (+0.67)K% 30.6% → 23.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF30.65%—×0.77023.60%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.26%—×1.1508.35%
HR / BF /BF2.42%÷1.316×1.2502.30%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 163).

Result: FIP 2.76 → 3.43, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AFresno Grizzlies · 32 IPFIP 3.36 → 4.09 (+0.73)K% 22.1% → 16.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF22.14%—×0.74016.38%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.87%—×1.1808.11%
HR / BF /BF2.29%÷1.218×1.3002.44%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 144).

Result: FIP 3.36 → 4.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).