Daniel Gonzalez

P ACL White Sox

Age 25 LHP 6'3" / 160 lbs ROK

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2022	20	ROKCWS	21	1	45	5.24	4.49	23.9%	11.2%	—	K 16.3% · BB 14.0% · FIP 5.66
2023	21	ROKCWS	16	0	20	1.83	3.56	36.0%	17.4%	—	K 24.5% · BB 21.8% · FIP 4.61
2024	22	MIX2 levels	29	0	35	4.33	2.90	32.2%	17.5%	—	K 22.5% · BB 21.4% · FIP 4.34
2027PROJ	25	MLBCWS	20	0	21	4.89	4.89	23.3%	13.8%	-0.1
2028PROJ43% MLB	26	MLBCWS	9	0	9	4.82	4.81	23.5%	13.3%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsHector Mercado (age 26) · Nick Hagadone (age 26) · Mitchell Tyranski (age 25)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 110118vR 126

ERA4.89

FIP4.89

K%23.3%

BB%13.8%

K-BB%9.5%

Proj IP21

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 21 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2021	19	ROK MLE	DSL White Sox	20	1	36	170	34	26	3	5%	1.8	13.6%	19.1%	-5.5%	2.2%	4.71	5.55	—
2021	19	ROK RAW	DSL White Sox	20	1	36	170	34	26	3	5%	1.8	20.0%	15.3%	4.7%	1.8%	4.71	4.45	—
2022	20	ROK MLE	DSL White Sox	21	1	45	205	49	23	7	5%	2.1	16.3%	14.0%	2.2%	3.9%	5.24	5.66	—
2022	20	ROK RAW	DSL White Sox	21	1	45	205	49	23	7	5%	2.1	23.9%	11.2%	12.7%	3.4%	5.24	4.49	—
2023	21	ROK MLE	ACL White Sox	16	0	20	86	31	15	2	0%	1.2	24.5%	21.8%	2.7%	1.5%	1.83	4.61	—
2023	21	ROK RAW	ACL White Sox	16	0	20	86	31	15	2	0%	1.2	36.0%	17.4%	18.6%	2.3%	1.83	3.56	—
2024	22	MIX MLE	2 levels	29	0	35	171	55	30	1	0%	1.2	22.5%	21.4%	1.0%	0.8%	4.33	4.34	—
2024	22	MIX MLE	2 levels	29	0	35	171	55	30	1	0%	1.2	22.5%	21.4%	1.0%	0.8%	4.33	4.34	—
2024	22	MIX RAW	2 levels	29	0	35	171	55	30	1	0%	1.2	32.2%	17.5%	14.6%	0.6%	4.33	2.90	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	25	MLB	CWS	20	0	21	89	21	12	3	0%	1.1	23.3%	13.8%	9.5%	3.0%	4.89	4.89	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	26	MLB MLE	CWS	20	0	21	89	21	12	3	0%	1.1	23.5%	13.3%	10.2%	3.0%	4.82	4.81	-0.1
2028	26	MLB CTX	CWS	9	0	9	38	9	5	1	0%	1.0	23.5%	13.3%	10.2%	3.0%	4.82	4.81	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		9	0	9	38	9	5	1	0%	1.0	23.5%	13.3%	10.2%	3.0%	4.82	4.43	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	201	111	22	0%	1.1	23.5%	13.3%	10.2%	3.0%	4.82	4.43	+0.3
Career	—	MLE		86	2	136	632	116	117	14	2%	1.6	18.3%	18.5%	-0.1%	2.3%	4.37	5.13	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		126	3	200	929	170	172	21	2%	1.6	18.3%	18.5%	-0.1%	2.3%	4.37	5.13	-0.6

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Daniel Gonzalez (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.89	23.3%	13.8%	3.0%	—	4.81	23.5%	10.2%	21	-0.08	—	—	—
Hector Mercado L 2000 · 4.79 FIP	26	SU	4.79	21.7%	13.3%	3.3%	.270	4.22	22.9%	10.0%	111	-0.57	3.47	125	89
Nick Hagadone L 2012 · 4.74 FIP	26	SU	4.74	22.4%	12.9%	3.5%	.310	3.88	24.6%	14.7%	82	-0.86	2.97	141	88
Mitchell Tyranski L 2023 · 5.14 FIP	25	SU	5.14	20.4%	13.6%	3.7%	.269	4.10	20.7%	6.1%	103	-1.04	3.46	145	86
Andrew Walling L 2024 · 4.05 FIP	24	SU	4.05	23.4%	13.2%	2.3%	.281	3.73	20.8%	7.5%	52	-0.32	3.14	161	84
Trey Cumbie L 2021 · 4.54 FIP	25	SU	4.54	25.3%	15.3%	3.0%	.284	5.07	23.3%	7.2%	42	+0.53	3.44	152	83
C.J. Widger L 2024 · 4.21 FIP	25	SU	4.21	26.0%	16.0%	2.3%	.258	5.75	18.1%	-0.7%	57	+1.54	3.83	105	83
Giovanni Soto L 2016 · 4.01 FIP	25	SU	4.01	21.3%	14.3%	1.6%	.348	4.18	25.6%	15.1%	25	+0.17	3.30	128	83
Jackson Lancaster L 2024 · 4.48 FIP	25	SU	4.48	24.0%	11.1%	3.6%	.355	5.36	18.3%	4.9%	93	+0.88	4.15	142	83
Colton Johnson L 2024 · 3.92 FIP	26	SU	3.92	20.8%	11.0%	2.1%	.309	4.53	12.2%	-0.4%	48	+0.61	3.92	106	82
Will Ohman L 2001 · 4.66 FIP	23	SU	4.66	22.2%	11.1%	3.7%	.353	—	—	—	—	—	2.88	350	82
Wayne Franklin L 2000 · 3.80 FIP	26	SU	3.80	20.4%	10.7%	1.9%	.319	5.53	13.7%	2.4%	231	+1.73	3.80	315	81
John Beller L 2023 · 4.16 FIP	24	SU	4.16	21.6%	14.2%	2.0%	.331	—	—	—	—	—	4.16	170	81
Robby Ahlstrom L 2024 · 3.89 FIP	25	SU	3.89	21.9%	11.6%	2.1%	.294	4.02	20.7%	11.1%	120	+0.13	3.79	332	80
Jared Tobey L 2021 · 4.11 FIP	25	SU	4.11	23.6%	11.8%	2.8%	.341	8.03	20.1%	1.1%	25	+3.92	3.99	158	80
Graeme Stinson L 2023 · 4.85 FIP	25	SU	4.85	19.5%	15.6%	2.6%	.302	—	—	—	—	—	3.56	146	80
Will Gilbert L 2019 · 4.42 FIP	25	SU	4.42	19.9%	10.3%	3.1%	.306	—	—	—	—	—	2.92	141	80
Paul Fry L 2017 · 4.66 FIP	25	SU	4.66	21.2%	11.7%	3.4%	.338	3.43	24.6%	14.6%	159	-1.23	1.78	560	80
Brian Moran L 2015 · 4.50 FIP	26	SU	4.50	17.7%	14.1%	2.0%	.318	2.74	25.0%	17.4%	80	-1.76	1.80	421	79
Haylen Green L 2023 · 4.09 FIP	25	SU	4.09	18.6%	10.8%	2.2%	.317	—	—	—	—	—	4.02	104	79
Sean Mellen L 2022 · 4.01 FIP	24	SU	4.01	21.3%	10.4%	2.5%	.285	—	—	—	—	—	4.01	101	79