Sean McLain
SS Tulsa Drillers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | A+/A/INTL3 orgs | 481 | .221/.343/.355 | 9 | 18 | 55 | — | .154/.251/.239 |
| 2025 | 24 | AALAD | 439 | .201/.306/.282 | 5 | 10 | 34 | — | .167/.247/.230 |
| 2026 | 25 | AALAD | 206 | .258/.341/.445 | 7 | 10 | 67 | — | .203/.273/.342 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 26 | MLBLAD | 2 | .180/.254/.273 | 0 | 0 | 53 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ27% MLB | 27 | MLBLAD | 37 | .182/.257/.277 | 1 | 1 | 54 | -0.1 |
Tools · ContractCON 35 / POW 30
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 63 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 175 | 297 | 238 | 535 | 63 | 233 | 26 | 11 | 261 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 24 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 182 | 250 | 318 | 568 | 136 | 188 | 21 | 8 | 258 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ | Great Lakes Loons | — | 110 | 95 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 36 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 211 | 318 | 326 | 644 | 116 | 328 | 33 | 11 | 298 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 295 | 249 | 54 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 28 | 78 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 217 | 332 | 341 | 674 | 124 | 290 | 26 | 9 | 309 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | INTL | Glendale Desert Dogs | — | 76 | 59 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 19 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 254 | 421 | 458 | 879 | 203 | 324 | 25 | 21 | 396 | 154 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA | Tulsa Drillers | — | 439 | 379 | 76 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 48 | 95 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 201 | 306 | 282 | 588 | 82 | 254 | 22 | 11 | 277 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA | Tulsa Drillers | — | 206 | 182 | 47 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 63 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 258 | 341 | 445 | 787 | 187 | 354 | 31 | 8 | 349 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 66 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 136 | 230 | 197 | 427 | 61 | 213 | 38 | 7 | 187 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 24 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 174 | 208 | 304 | 513 | 130 | 178 | 29 | 4 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 110 | 99 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 46 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 162 | 245 | 263 | 508 | 101 | 279 | 42 | 7 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 295 | 257 | 39 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 110 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 152 | 253 | 230 | 483 | 78 | 240 | 37 | 7 | 225 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 439 | 396 | 66 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 118 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 167 | 247 | 230 | 476 | 63 | 226 | 27 | 7 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 206 | 187 | 38 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 77 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 203 | 273 | 342 | 615 | 139 | 301 | 37 | 6 | 267 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 66 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 136 | 230 | 197 | 427 | 61 | 216 | 38 | 7 | 187 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 63 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 175 | 297 | 238 | 535 | 63 | 233 | 26 | 11 | 261 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 24 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 174 | 208 | 304 | 513 | 130 | 200 | 29 | 4 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 24 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 182 | 250 | 318 | 568 | 136 | 188 | 21 | 8 | 258 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 481 | 425 | 66 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 34 | 186 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 155 | 249 | 242 | 491 | 87 | 257 | 39 | 7 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A RAW | 3 teams | — | 481 | 403 | 89 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 56 | 133 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 221 | 343 | 355 | 698 | 134 | 303 | 28 | 12 | 320 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 439 | 396 | 66 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 118 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 167 | 247 | 230 | 476 | 63 | 226 | 27 | 7 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA RAW | Tulsa Drillers | — | 439 | 379 | 76 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 48 | 95 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 201 | 306 | 282 | 588 | 82 | 254 | 22 | 11 | 277 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 206 | 187 | 38 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 77 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 203 | 273 | 342 | 615 | 139 | 311 | 37 | 6 | 267 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA RAW | Tulsa Drillers | — | 206 | 182 | 47 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 63 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 258 | 341 | 445 | 787 | 187 | 354 | 31 | 8 | 349 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 66 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 136 | 230 | 197 | 427 | 61 | 213 | 38 | 7 | 187 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 24 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 174 | 208 | 304 | 513 | 130 | 178 | 29 | 4 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 481 | 425 | 66 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 34 | 186 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 155 | 249 | 242 | 491 | 87 | 251 | 39 | 7 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 439 | 394 | 66 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 118 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 168 | 247 | 231 | 478 | 63 | 226 | 27 | 7 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 206 | 186 | 38 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 77 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 204 | 273 | 344 | 617 | 140 | 301 | 37 | 6 | 267 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 481 | 425 | 66 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 34 | 186 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 155 | 249 | 242 | 491 | 87 | 251 | 39 | 7 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 439 | 394 | 66 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 118 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 168 | 247 | 231 | 478 | 63 | 226 | 27 | 7 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 206 | 186 | 38 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 77 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 204 | 273 | 344 | 617 | 140 | 301 | 37 | 6 | 267 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB MLE | LAD | 2% | 256 | 231 | 43 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 86 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 183 | 258 | 278 | 536 | 95 | 269 | 34 | 7 | 246 | 53 | -14 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +6 | -0.2 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB CTX | LAD | 2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 180 | 254 | 273 | 527 | 93 | 262 | 50 | 0 | 243 | 53 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | LAD | 27% | 138 | 124 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 46 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 185 | 260 | 282 | 542 | 97 | 269 | 33 | 7 | 249 | 54 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +3 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | LAD | 27% | 37 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 182 | 257 | 277 | 533 | 95 | 263 | 32 | 8 | 245 | 54 | -2 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 37 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 182 | 270 | 303 | 573 | 121 | 250 | 32 | 8 | 245 | 42 | -2 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 580 | 106 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 53 | 211 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 183 | 272 | 307 | 579 | 124 | 251 | 32 | 8 | 245 | 42 | -35 | +4 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1470 | 1319 | 225 | 34 | 12 | 20 | 101 | 498 | 43 | 47 | 15 | 171 | 252 | 260 | 512 | 89 | 254 | 34 | 7 | 230 | 42 | -14 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +5 | -0.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 583 | 99 | 15 | 5 | 9 | 45 | 220 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 170 | 252 | 259 | 511 | 89 | 252 | 34 | 7 | 230 | 42 | -36 | +1 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AATulsa Drillers · 206 PAwOBA .341 → .267 (−74)K% 30.6% → 37.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.58% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 37.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.25% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.998 | 5.77% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.91% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×0.998 | 2.53% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.21% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 21.99% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 4.68% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.940 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 2.25% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 4.70% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .341 → .267; ISO .187 → .143; BABIP .354 → .301. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AATulsa Drillers · 439 PAwOBA .270 → .219 (−51)K% 21.6% → 26.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.64% | ÷0.984 | ×1.220 | — | — | 26.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.93% | ÷1.061 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.012 | 7.30% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.28% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×1.012 | 2.01% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.07% | ÷0.968 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 18.34% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.23% | ÷1.014 | ×0.840 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 3.36% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.70% | ÷1.137 | ×0.940 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 0.56% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.76% | ÷0.957 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 1.49% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 94, 2B 103, 3B 127, K 97, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .270 → .219; ISO .082 → .066; BABIP .254 → .226. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 295 PAwOBA .305 → .225 (−80)K% 26.4% → 37.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.44% | ÷0.964 | ×1.360 | — | — | 37.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.49% | ÷0.943 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 6.88% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.08% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 3.93% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.05% | ÷1.072 | ×0.920 | ×0.978 | ×0.990 | 17.49% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.85% | ÷0.973 | ×0.830 | ×0.978 | ×0.990 | 4.83% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.75% | ÷0.973 | ×0.910 | ×0.978 | ×0.990 | 1.59% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.92% | ÷1.072 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 2.16% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 114, 1B 114, 2B 95, 3B 95, K 93, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.
Result: wOBA .305 → .225; ISO .124 → .089; BABIP .290 → .240. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Great Lakes Loons · 110 PAwOBA .291 → .216 (−75)K% 32.7% → 42.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.73% | ÷0.990 | ×1.270 | — | — | 41.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.91% | ÷1.037 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 7.46% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.73% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 2.15% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.03% | ÷1.004 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 19.15% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.78% | ÷0.950 | ×0.810 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 5.48% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.39% | ÷0.948 | ×0.850 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 2.88% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.69% | ÷1.036 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 1.31% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 101, 2B 90, 3B 90, K 98, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .291 → .216; ISO .116 → .085; BABIP .328 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 24 PAwOBA .251 → .198 (−53)K% 20.8% → 29.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.83% | ÷0.973 | ×1.360 | — | — | 29.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.33% | ÷0.976 | ×0.690 | — | — | 5.89% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.65% | ÷0.955 | ×0.920 | — | — | 17.00% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.990 | ×0.830 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.88% | ÷1.025 | ×0.800 | — | — | 4.59% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 91, 2B 98, 3B 80, K 95, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .251 → .198; ISO .136 → .098; BABIP .188 → .178. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 74 PAwOBA .255 → .187 (−67)K% 25.7% → 37.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.68% | ÷0.930 | ×1.360 | — | — | 37.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.81% | ÷1.072 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 7.06% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.05% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 3.21% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.45% | ÷0.981 | ×0.920 | ×0.973 | ×1.015 | 18.94% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.27% | ÷0.923 | ×0.830 | ×0.973 | ×1.015 | 2.02% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×0.973 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.27% | ÷1.247 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 1.48% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 96, 2B 85, 3B 130, K 86, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.973.
Result: wOBA .255 → .187; ISO .063 → .040; BABIP .233 → .213. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .