Brandon White
P Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | AMIA | 19 | 15 | 81 | 4.98 | 3.14 | 20.4% | 6.5% | — | K 15.1% · BB 7.7% · FIP 4.16 |
| 2025 | 25 | A+MIA | 23 | 12 | 93 | 4.06 | 3.21 | 18.8% | 6.7% | — | K 14.4% · BB 7.7% · FIP 3.90 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 24 | 22 | 106 | 5.11 | 3.58 | 26.3% | 6.0% | — | K 22.2% · BB 5.6% · FIP 4.10 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBMIA | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4.28 | 4.28 | 20.9% | 5.7% | 0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ33% MLB | 28 | MLBMIA | 4 | 4 | 22 | 4.25 | 4.28 | 21.0% | 6.2% | 0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ47% MLB | 29 | MLBMIA | 5 | 5 | 29 | 4.33 | 4.40 | 21.0% | 6.6% | 0.3 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 10 | 6 | 29 | 122 | 26 | 10 | 2 | 60% | 2.9 | 16.7% | 10.3% | 6.3% | 3.5% | 5.02 | 4.93 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 10 | 6 | 29 | 122 | 26 | 10 | 2 | 60% | 2.9 | 21.3% | 8.2% | 13.1% | 1.6% | 5.02 | 3.24 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | A MLE | Jupiter Hammerheads | 19 | 15 | 81 | 353 | 72 | 23 | 6 | 79% | 4.3 | 15.1% | 7.7% | 7.4% | 2.5% | 4.98 | 4.16 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | A MLE | Jupiter Hammerheads | 19 | 15 | 81 | 353 | 72 | 23 | 6 | 79% | 4.3 | 15.1% | 7.7% | 7.4% | 2.5% | 4.98 | 4.16 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | A RAW | Jupiter Hammerheads | 19 | 15 | 81 | 353 | 72 | 23 | 6 | 79% | 4.3 | 20.4% | 6.5% | 13.9% | 1.7% | 4.98 | 3.14 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | A+ MLE | Beloit Sky Carp | 23 | 12 | 93 | 389 | 73 | 26 | 6 | 52% | 4.0 | 14.4% | 7.7% | 6.8% | 1.9% | 4.06 | 3.90 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | A+ MLE | Beloit Sky Carp | 23 | 12 | 93 | 389 | 73 | 26 | 6 | 52% | 4.0 | 14.4% | 7.7% | 6.8% | 1.9% | 4.06 | 3.90 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | A+ RAW | Beloit Sky Carp | 23 | 12 | 93 | 389 | 73 | 26 | 6 | 52% | 4.0 | 18.8% | 6.7% | 12.1% | 1.5% | 4.06 | 3.21 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 22 | 106 | 452 | 119 | 27 | 16 | 92% | 4.4 | 22.2% | 5.6% | 16.6% | 3.9% | 5.11 | 4.10 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 22 | 106 | 452 | 119 | 27 | 16 | 92% | 4.4 | 22.2% | 5.6% | 16.6% | 3.9% | 5.11 | 4.10 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 22 | 106 | 452 | 119 | 27 | 16 | 92% | 4.4 | 26.3% | 6.0% | 20.4% | 3.5% | 5.11 | 3.58 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | MIA | 1 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 100% | 7.0 | 20.9% | 5.7% | 15.3% | 3.4% | 4.28 | 4.28 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIA | 11 | 11 | 68 | 285 | 60 | 18 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.0% | 6.2% | 14.9% | 3.4% | 4.34 | 4.37 | +0.8 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIA | 10 | 10 | 63 | 265 | 56 | 17 | 9 | 100% | 6.3 | 21.0% | 6.6% | 14.4% | 3.6% | 4.43 | 4.50 | +0.7 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIA | 4 | 4 | 22 | 93 | 20 | 6 | 3 | 100% | 5.5 | 21.0% | 6.2% | 14.9% | 3.3% | 4.25 | 4.28 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIA | 5 | 5 | 29 | 122 | 26 | 8 | 4 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.0% | 6.6% | 14.4% | 3.4% | 4.33 | 4.40 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 9 | 9 | 52 | 219 | 46 | 14 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.0% | 6.4% | 14.6% | 3.3% | 4.29 | 3.97 | +0.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 178 | 54 | 27 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.0% | 6.4% | 14.6% | 3.3% | 4.29 | 3.97 | +3.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 76 | 55 | 309 | 1316 | 230 | 95 | 38 | 72% | 4.1 | 17.5% | 7.2% | 10.3% | 2.9% | 4.75 | 4.14 | +1.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 49 | 36 | 200 | 853 | 149 | 62 | 25 | 72% | 4.1 | 17.5% | 7.2% | 10.3% | 2.9% | 4.75 | 4.14 | +2.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 73 IPFIP 4.25 → 4.69 (+0.44)K% 24.8% → 21.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.77% | — | ×0.860 | 21.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.81% | — | ×0.900 | 6.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.33% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 4.77% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.25 → 4.69, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAPensacola Blue Wahoos · 33 IPFIP 1.89 → 2.59 (+0.70)K% 30.2% → 24.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.23% | — | ×0.810 | 24.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.88% | — | ×1.100 | 4.26% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.55% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 1.86% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.89 → 2.59, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Beloit Sky Carp · 93 IPFIP 3.21 → 3.90 (+0.70)K% 18.8% → 14.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.77% | — | ×0.770 | 14.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.68% | — | ×1.150 | 7.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.54% | ÷1.006 | ×1.250 | 1.92% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 3.21 → 3.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AJupiter Hammerheads · 81 IPFIP 3.14 → 4.16 (+1.03)K% 20.4% → 15.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.40% | — | ×0.740 | 15.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.52% | — | ×1.180 | 7.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.70% | ÷0.888 | ×1.300 | 2.49% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 3.14 → 4.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AJupiter Hammerheads · 19 IPFIP 3.68 → 4.93 (+1.25)K% 22.5% → 16.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.50% | — | ×0.740 | 16.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.75% | — | ×1.180 | 10.32% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.50% | ÷0.924 | ×1.300 | 3.52% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 3.68 → 4.93, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Marlins · 10 IPFIP 2.40 → 3.14 (+0.74)K% 19.0% → 13.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.05% | — | ×0.680 | 12.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.14% | — | ×1.250 | 8.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.995 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 2.40 → 3.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.0 | 67 | 21.0% | 6.1% | 1.34 | 4.35 |
| Casey Fien ('17) | 1.4 | 58 | 21.0% | 5.1% | 1.46 | 4.42 |
| Blas Minor ('97) | 1.1 | 75 | 19.2% | 7.3% | 1.16 | 4.40 |
| Tim Crews ('87-'92, 3 WAR*) | 2.1 | 71 | 20.8%* | 6.2%* | 1.09* | 4.11* |
| Dale Thayer ('15) | 1.3 | 63 | 20.4% | 6.3% | 1.07 | 3.47 |
| Rich Monteleone ('87-'96, 2 WAR*) | 1.8 | 71 | 18.7%* | 7.5%* | 1.39* | 4.03* |
| Pete Ladd ('79-'86, 0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 72 | 24.6%* | 7.8%* | 1.53* | 4.42* |