Zane Zielinski
SS Eugene Emeralds| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24 | A+SF | 483 | .240/.340/.303 | 4 | 32 | 49 | — | .200/.284/.249 |
| 2026 | 25 | AA/A+SF | 330 | .234/.302/.308 | 2 | 16 | 36 | — | .198/.250/.251 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 26 | MLBSF | 1 | .175/.241/.227 | 0 | 0 | 36 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ26% MLB | 27 | MLBSF | 44 | .177/.244/.233 | 0 | 1 | 38 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 40 / POW 25
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 24 | A+ | Eugene Emeralds | — | 483 | 412 | 99 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 49 | 123 | 14 | 32 | 9 | 240 | 340 | 303 | 644 | 63 | 329 | 25 | 10 | 298 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA | Richmond Flying Squirrels | — | 146 | 136 | 28 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 51 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 206 | 250 | 301 | 551 | 96 | 313 | 35 | 5 | 246 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ | Eugene Emeralds | — | 184 | 159 | 41 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 50 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 258 | 344 | 314 | 659 | 57 | 373 | 27 | 10 | 300 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 483 | 426 | 85 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 36 | 155 | 14 | 32 | 9 | 200 | 284 | 249 | 532 | 49 | 290 | 32 | 7 | 241 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Richmond Flying Squirrels | — | 146 | 138 | 25 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 62 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 181 | 215 | 246 | 462 | 65 | 307 | 42 | 3 | 203 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 184 | 165 | 35 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 68 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 212 | 278 | 255 | 532 | 42 | 337 | 37 | 7 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 483 | 426 | 85 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 36 | 155 | 14 | 32 | 9 | 200 | 284 | 249 | 532 | 49 | 301 | 32 | 7 | 241 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ RAW | Eugene Emeralds | — | 483 | 412 | 99 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 49 | 123 | 14 | 32 | 9 | 240 | 340 | 303 | 644 | 63 | 329 | 25 | 10 | 298 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 330 | 303 | 59 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 130 | 3 | 16 | 3 | 195 | 247 | 248 | 494 | 53 | 335 | 39 | 5 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 330 | 295 | 69 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 101 | 3 | 16 | 3 | 234 | 302 | 308 | 611 | 75 | 347 | 31 | 8 | 276 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 483 | 430 | 85 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 36 | 155 | 14 | 32 | 9 | 198 | 284 | 247 | 530 | 49 | 290 | 32 | 7 | 241 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 330 | 306 | 59 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 130 | 3 | 16 | 3 | 193 | 247 | 245 | 492 | 52 | 324 | 39 | 5 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 483 | 430 | 85 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 36 | 155 | 14 | 32 | 9 | 198 | 284 | 247 | 530 | 49 | 290 | 32 | 7 | 241 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 330 | 306 | 59 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 130 | 3 | 16 | 3 | 193 | 247 | 245 | 492 | 52 | 324 | 39 | 5 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB MLE | SF | 0% | 380 | 346 | 61 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 141 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 177 | 243 | 231 | 474 | 54 | 286 | 37 | 7 | 221 | 36 | -29 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +8 | -0.5 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB CTX | SF | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 175 | 241 | 227 | 468 | 53 | 283 | 0 | 0 | 219 | 36 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | SF | 26% | 167 | 152 | 27 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 61 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 180 | 246 | 237 | 484 | 58 | 286 | 37 | 7 | 225 | 38 | -12 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +4 | -0.6 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | SF | 26% | 44 | 40 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 177 | 244 | 233 | 477 | 56 | 283 | 36 | 7 | 222 | 38 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 44 | 40 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 150 | 227 | 175 | 402 | 25 | 250 | 36 | 7 | 222 | 42 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 591 | 89 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 236 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 151 | 228 | 176 | 404 | 25 | 251 | 36 | 7 | 222 | 42 | -48 | +3 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -2.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1135 | 1023 | 196 | 30 | 2 | 6 | 75 | 403 | 21 | 58 | 14 | 192 | 261 | 242 | 503 | 51 | 306 | 36 | 7 | 230 | 42 | -24 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +7 | -1.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 586 | 111 | 17 | 1 | 3 | 43 | 231 | 12 | 33 | 8 | 189 | 259 | 237 | 496 | 48 | 303 | 36 | 7 | 230 | 42 | -49 | +2 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -2.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Eugene Emeralds · 184 PAwOBA .295 → .236 (−58)K% 27.2% → 36.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.17% | ÷1.000 | ×1.350 | — | — | 36.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 7.17% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.09% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.978 | 0.86% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.36% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.035 | ×0.978 | 27.05% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.035 | ×0.978 | 6.94% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.035 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.035.
Result: wOBA .295 → .236; ISO .057 → .044; BABIP .373 → .337. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 146 PAwOBA .240 → .203 (−36)K% 34.9% → 42.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.93% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 42.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.79% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.998 | 3.35% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.68% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.998 | 0.58% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.35% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | ×1.050 | ×0.998 | 22.72% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.24% | ÷1.000 | ×0.860 | ×1.050 | ×0.998 | 7.42% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.950 | ×1.050 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.35% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.998 | 1.83% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .240 → .203; ISO .096 → .074; BABIP .313 → .307. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Eugene Emeralds · 483 PAwOBA .293 → .241 (−53)K% 25.5% → 32.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.47% | ÷1.070 | ×1.350 | — | — | 32.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.14% | ÷0.950 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 7.49% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.90% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 2.32% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.72% | ÷1.011 | ×0.910 | ×1.006 | ×0.988 | 25.71% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.46% | ÷1.048 | ×0.830 | ×1.006 | ×0.988 | 2.72% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.69% | ÷0.909 | ×0.820 | ×1.006 | ×0.988 | 0.62% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.38% | ÷0.980 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 1.16% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 102, 2B 110, 3B 82, K 114, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.006.
Result: wOBA .293 → .241; ISO .063 → .051; BABIP .329 → .290. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).