J.D. Gonzalez
C Charleston RiverDogs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | A/INTL2 orgs | 312 | .156/.273/.195 | 1 | 1 | 3 | — | .119/.204/.146 |
| 2025 | 19 | A/INTL2 orgs | 145 | .164/.222/.172 | 0 | 0 | -4 | — | .150/.183/.160 |
| 2026 | 20 | A+/ATB | 327 | .240/.288/.307 | 3 | 7 | 36 | — | .209/.244/.268 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBTB | 437 | .182/.225/.234 | 3 | 6 | 28 | -0.8 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 22 | MLBTB | 91 | .190/.235/.255 | 1 | 2 | 37 | -0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ48% MLB | 23 | MLBTB | 172 | .196/.244/.274 | 2 | 3 | 44 | -0.4 |
Tools · ContractCON 38 / POW 37
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | INTL | Gigantes de Carolina | — | 17 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 294 | 200 | 494 | 600 | 59 | 12 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2024 | 18 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 288 | 242 | 39 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 34 | 95 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 161 | 275 | 198 | 473 | 37 | 248 | 33 | 12 | 227 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | INTL | Gigantes de Carolina | — | 24 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 150 | 400 | 50 | 167 | 33 | 17 | 207 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 104 | 98 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 173 | 221 | 184 | 405 | 10 | 239 | 26 | 6 | 192 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | INTL | Gigantes de Carolina | — | 41 | 36 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 139 | 225 | 139 | 364 | 217 | 32 | 7 | 179 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2026 | 20 | A+ | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 98 | 86 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 32 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 209 | 284 | 314 | 598 | 105 | 302 | 33 | 9 | 266 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 229 | 214 | 54 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 40 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 252 | 289 | 304 | 593 | 51 | 303 | 17 | 5 | 265 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 18 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 288 | 253 | 30 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 131 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 119 | 204 | 146 | 350 | 28 | 214 | 45 | 8 | 169 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 104 | 100 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150 | 183 | 160 | 343 | 10 | 231 | 36 | 4 | 155 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A+ MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 98 | 89 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 42 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 169 | 221 | 258 | 479 | 90 | 276 | 43 | 6 | 208 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 229 | 217 | 49 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 55 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 226 | 253 | 272 | 525 | 46 | 285 | 24 | 3 | 227 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | INTL MLE | Gigantes de Carolina | — | 17 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 294 | 200 | 494 | 600 | 59 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2023 | 17 | INTL RAW | Gigantes de Carolina | — | 17 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 294 | 200 | 494 | 600 | 59 | 12 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2024 | 18 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 312 | 275 | 33 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 142 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 120 | 204 | 149 | 353 | 29 | 230 | 46 | 8 | 169 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 312 | 262 | 41 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 38 | 103 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 156 | 273 | 195 | 468 | 38 | 242 | 33 | 12 | 226 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 145 | 137 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 51 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 146 | 188 | 153 | 341 | 7 | 233 | 35 | 4 | 155 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 145 | 134 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 164 | 222 | 172 | 394 | 7 | 234 | 28 | 6 | 188 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 327 | 307 | 64 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 96 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 208 | 241 | 257 | 498 | 49 | 292 | 29 | 4 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 327 | 300 | 72 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 72 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 240 | 287 | 307 | 594 | 67 | 303 | 22 | 6 | 265 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 312 | 280 | 33 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 142 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 118 | 204 | 146 | 350 | 29 | 214 | 46 | 8 | 169 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 145 | 137 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 51 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 146 | 188 | 153 | 341 | 7 | 231 | 35 | 4 | 155 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 327 | 311 | 64 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 96 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 206 | 241 | 254 | 495 | 48 | 282 | 29 | 4 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 18 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 312 | 280 | 33 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 142 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 118 | 204 | 146 | 350 | 29 | 214 | 46 | 8 | 169 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 145 | 137 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 51 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 146 | 188 | 153 | 341 | 7 | 231 | 35 | 4 | 155 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 327 | 311 | 64 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 96 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 206 | 241 | 254 | 495 | 48 | 282 | 29 | 4 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | TB | 0% | 437 | 411 | 75 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 148 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 182 | 225 | 234 | 459 | 52 | 272 | 34 | 5 | 210 | 28 | -37 | +1 | +0 | +8 | +9 | -0.8 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | TB | 34% | 266 | 249 | 46 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 88 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 188 | 234 | 255 | 488 | 67 | 274 | 33 | 5 | 222 | 37 | -20 | +0 | +0 | +5 | +6 | -0.9 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB MLE | TB | 48% | 355 | 332 | 65 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 114 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 194 | 242 | 274 | 516 | 80 | 276 | 32 | 5 | 234 | 44 | -24 | +1 | +0 | +6 | +8 | -0.9 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB MLE | TB | 53% | 412 | 384 | 77 | 12 | 1 | 7 | 23 | 130 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 199 | 248 | 288 | 536 | 89 | 278 | 32 | 6 | 242 | 50 | -24 | +1 | +0 | +7 | +9 | -0.7 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB MLE | TB | 55% | 444 | 413 | 83 | 13 | 1 | 8 | 26 | 137 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 202 | 253 | 298 | 551 | 95 | 279 | 31 | 6 | 248 | 54 | -24 | +1 | +0 | +8 | +10 | -0.6 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB MLE | TB | 56% | 445 | 413 | 84 | 14 | 1 | 8 | 27 | 136 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 204 | 257 | 304 | 560 | 99 | 279 | 31 | 6 | 252 | 57 | -23 | +1 | +0 | +8 | +10 | -0.4 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB MLE | TB | 55% | 445 | 413 | 84 | 14 | 1 | 8 | 27 | 137 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 203 | 256 | 301 | 556 | 98 | 279 | 31 | 6 | 251 | 56 | -23 | +1 | +0 | +8 | +10 | -0.5 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | TB | 34% | 91 | 86 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 190 | 235 | 255 | 491 | 65 | 278 | 33 | 5 | 223 | 37 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +2 | -0.3 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB CTX | TB | 48% | 172 | 160 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 55 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 196 | 244 | 274 | 518 | 78 | 280 | 32 | 5 | 235 | 44 | -11 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +4 | -0.4 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB CTX | TB | 53% | 217 | 202 | 39 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 68 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 201 | 250 | 288 | 538 | 87 | 281 | 31 | 6 | 243 | 50 | -13 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +5 | -0.4 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB CTX | TB | 55% | 243 | 226 | 46 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 75 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 204 | 255 | 297 | 552 | 93 | 282 | 31 | 6 | 249 | 54 | -13 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +5 | -0.3 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB CTX | TB | 56% | 248 | 230 | 48 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 76 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 206 | 258 | 303 | 562 | 97 | 283 | 31 | 6 | 253 | 57 | -13 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +5 | -0.2 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB CTX | TB | 55% | 245 | 227 | 46 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 75 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 205 | 257 | 301 | 558 | 95 | 282 | 31 | 6 | 252 | 56 | -13 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +5 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1216 | 1131 | 226 | 34 | 3 | 19 | 70 | 379 | 5 | 22 | 5 | 200 | 250 | 286 | 535 | 86 | 280 | 31 | 6 | 246 | 40 | -70 | +2 | +0 | +22 | +26 | -2.0 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 605 | 121 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 37 | 203 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 200 | 250 | 286 | 536 | 86 | 281 | 31 | 6 | 246 | 40 | -37 | +1 | +0 | +12 | +14 | -1.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3378 | 3135 | 594 | 91 | 5 | 43 | 192 | 1112 | 16 | 53 | 10 | 189 | 240 | 263 | 503 | 73 | 275 | 33 | 6 | 227 | 40 | -156 | +5 | +0 | +46 | +56 | -5.0 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 603 | 115 | 18 | 1 | 8 | 37 | 214 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 191 | 241 | 264 | 505 | 73 | 278 | 33 | 6 | 227 | 40 | -39 | +1 | +0 | +12 | +14 | -1.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ACharleston RiverDogs · 229 PAwOBA .261 → .227 (−34)K% 17.5% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.47% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 23.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.80% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 3.36% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.024 | ×1.015 | 24.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.024 | ×1.015 | 3.97% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.024 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.47% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.024.
Result: wOBA .261 → .227; ISO .051 → .042; BABIP .303 → .285. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 98 PAwOBA .262 → .208 (−54)K% 32.7% → 42.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.65% | ÷1.000 | ×1.310 | — | — | 42.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.18% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | — | ×1.027 | 5.66% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.07% | ÷1.000 | ×0.870 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 22.59% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.56% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 4.67% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.027 | 3.35% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .262 → .208; ISO .105 → .086; BABIP .302 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ACharleston RiverDogs · 104 PAwOBA .187 → .155 (−32)K% 26.0% → 35.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.96% | ÷1.006 | ×1.360 | — | — | 35.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.77% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 4.16% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.54% | ÷1.013 | ×0.920 | ×1.025 | ×1.030 | 21.61% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.41% | ÷0.850 | ×0.830 | ×1.025 | ×1.030 | 1.45% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.121 | ×0.910 | ×1.025 | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.159 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 103, 2B 70, 3B 124, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.
Result: wOBA .187 → .155; ISO .010 → .009; BABIP .239 → .231. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ACharleston RiverDogs · 288 PAwOBA .228 → .169 (−58)K% 33.0% → 45.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.99% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 45.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.81% | ÷1.047 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.045 | 8.13% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.39% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.045 | 1.13% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.77% | ÷1.071 | ×0.920 | ×0.974 | ×1.045 | 19.02% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.08% | ÷1.017 | ×0.830 | ×0.974 | ×1.045 | 3.39% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.099 | ×0.910 | ×0.974 | ×1.045 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.68% | ÷0.824 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.045 | 0.69% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 65, 1B 114, 2B 103, 3B 120, K 97, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.974.
Result: wOBA .228 → .169; ISO .037 → .029; BABIP .248 → .214. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .