Taylor Young
2B Tulsa Drillers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | AALAD | 547 | .236/.334/.329 | 4 | 46 | 42 | — | .184/.259/.255 |
| 2025 | 26 | AALAD | 575 | .233/.349/.288 | 2 | 44 | 52 | — | .204/.286/.249 |
| 2026 | 27 | AAA/AA/ROKLAD | 328 | .319/.419/.448 | 6 | 17 | 103 | — | .278/.355/.374 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 28 | MLBLAD | 3 | .219/.296/.289 | 0 | 0 | 71 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ23% MLB | 29 | MLBLAD | 48 | .217/.294/.288 | 0 | 2 | 70 | -0.0 |
Tools · ContractCON 45 / POW 25
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 23 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 137 | 106 | 31 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 25 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 292 | 453 | 406 | 858 | 113 | 367 | 18 | 20 | 397 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ | Great Lakes Loons | — | 545 | 443 | 109 | 21 | 5 | 7 | 82 | 112 | 13 | 56 | 5 | 246 | 378 | 363 | 742 | 117 | 309 | 21 | 15 | 340 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA | Tulsa Drillers | — | 547 | 474 | 112 | 28 | 2 | 4 | 59 | 138 | 11 | 46 | 10 | 236 | 334 | 329 | 663 | 93 | 323 | 25 | 11 | 306 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 26 | AA | Tulsa Drillers | — | 575 | 486 | 113 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 80 | 91 | 7 | 44 | 9 | 233 | 349 | 288 | 637 | 56 | 281 | 16 | 14 | 302 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AAA | Oklahoma City Comets | — | 50 | 41 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 366 | 469 | 610 | 1.079 | 244 | 382 | 10 | 14 | 461 | 144 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA | Tulsa Drillers | — | 251 | 215 | 68 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 41 | 4 | 17 | 2 | 316 | 414 | 428 | 842 | 112 | 376 | 16 | 13 | 383 | 102 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 27 | ROK | ACL Dodgers | — | 27 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 261 | 370 | 348 | 718 | 87 | 333 | 19 | 11 | 334 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 137 | 116 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 37 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 224 | 343 | 293 | 636 | 69 | 322 | 27 | 12 | 297 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 545 | 469 | 95 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 57 | 142 | 13 | 56 | 5 | 203 | 306 | 292 | 598 | 90 | 266 | 26 | 10 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 547 | 495 | 91 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 39 | 176 | 11 | 46 | 10 | 184 | 259 | 255 | 513 | 71 | 271 | 32 | 7 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 26 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 575 | 514 | 105 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 52 | 113 | 7 | 44 | 9 | 204 | 286 | 249 | 535 | 45 | 255 | 20 | 9 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AAA MLE | Oklahoma City Comets | — | 50 | 43 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 326 | 408 | 488 | 897 | 163 | 335 | 12 | 10 | 381 | 144 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 251 | 225 | 63 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 50 | 4 | 17 | 2 | 280 | 355 | 369 | 723 | 89 | 346 | 20 | 9 | 319 | 102 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 27 | ROK MLE | ACL Dodgers | — | 27 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 167 | 259 | 208 | 468 | 42 | 246 | 26 | 7 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 137 | 116 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 37 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 224 | 343 | 293 | 636 | 69 | 321 | 27 | 12 | 297 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 137 | 106 | 31 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 25 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 292 | 453 | 406 | 858 | 113 | 367 | 18 | 20 | 397 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 545 | 469 | 95 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 57 | 142 | 13 | 56 | 5 | 203 | 306 | 292 | 598 | 90 | 272 | 26 | 10 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ RAW | Great Lakes Loons | — | 545 | 443 | 109 | 21 | 5 | 7 | 82 | 112 | 13 | 56 | 5 | 246 | 378 | 363 | 742 | 117 | 309 | 21 | 15 | 340 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 547 | 495 | 91 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 39 | 176 | 11 | 46 | 10 | 184 | 259 | 255 | 513 | 71 | 277 | 32 | 7 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA RAW | Tulsa Drillers | — | 547 | 474 | 112 | 28 | 2 | 4 | 59 | 138 | 11 | 46 | 10 | 236 | 334 | 329 | 663 | 93 | 323 | 25 | 11 | 306 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 26 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 575 | 514 | 105 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 52 | 113 | 7 | 44 | 9 | 204 | 286 | 249 | 535 | 45 | 257 | 20 | 9 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 26 | AA RAW | Tulsa Drillers | — | 575 | 486 | 113 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 80 | 91 | 7 | 44 | 9 | 233 | 349 | 288 | 637 | 56 | 281 | 16 | 14 | 302 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA MLE | 3 teams | — | 328 | 293 | 81 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 63 | 6 | 17 | 3 | 276 | 352 | 379 | 731 | 102 | 338 | 19 | 9 | 320 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA RAW | 3 teams | — | 328 | 279 | 89 | 16 | 1 | 6 | 42 | 51 | 6 | 17 | 3 | 319 | 419 | 448 | 867 | 129 | 374 | 16 | 13 | 391 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 137 | 115 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 37 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 226 | 343 | 296 | 639 | 70 | 322 | 27 | 12 | 297 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 545 | 470 | 95 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 57 | 142 | 13 | 56 | 5 | 202 | 306 | 291 | 598 | 89 | 266 | 26 | 10 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 547 | 492 | 91 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 39 | 176 | 11 | 46 | 10 | 185 | 259 | 256 | 515 | 71 | 271 | 32 | 7 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 26 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 575 | 511 | 105 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 52 | 113 | 7 | 44 | 9 | 205 | 286 | 250 | 537 | 45 | 255 | 20 | 9 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA MLE | 3 teams | — | 328 | 291 | 81 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 63 | 6 | 17 | 3 | 278 | 352 | 381 | 733 | 103 | 336 | 19 | 9 | 320 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 25 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 547 | 492 | 91 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 39 | 176 | 11 | 46 | 10 | 185 | 259 | 256 | 515 | 71 | 271 | 32 | 7 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 26 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 575 | 511 | 105 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 52 | 113 | 7 | 44 | 9 | 205 | 286 | 250 | 537 | 45 | 255 | 20 | 9 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA MLE | 3 teams | — | 328 | 291 | 81 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 63 | 6 | 17 | 3 | 278 | 352 | 381 | 733 | 103 | 336 | 19 | 9 | 320 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB MLE | LAD | 2% | 378 | 338 | 76 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 32 | 83 | 5 | 18 | 4 | 223 | 300 | 295 | 594 | 72 | 284 | 22 | 8 | 274 | 71 | -13 | +2 | +0 | +1 | +8 | 0.0 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB CTX | LAD | 2% | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 219 | 296 | 289 | 584 | 70 | 278 | 33 | 0 | 270 | 71 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | LAD | 23% | 211 | 188 | 42 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 47 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 221 | 298 | 294 | 592 | 73 | 283 | 22 | 9 | 272 | 70 | -7 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +5 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | LAD | 23% | 48 | 43 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 217 | 294 | 288 | 582 | 71 | 277 | 23 | 8 | 269 | 70 | -2 | +0 | -0 | +0 | +1 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 48 | 43 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 209 | 292 | 256 | 547 | 47 | 281 | 23 | 8 | 269 | 65 | -2 | +0 | -0 | +0 | +1 | -0.0 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 582 | 122 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 149 | 14 | 27 | 0 | 210 | 292 | 256 | 548 | 46 | 282 | 23 | 8 | 269 | 65 | -23 | +5 | -4 | +2 | +14 | -0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2498 | 2214 | 471 | 85 | 8 | 20 | 224 | 612 | 46 | 190 | 30 | 213 | 298 | 285 | 584 | 73 | 283 | 24 | 9 | 264 | 65 | -13 | +2 | -1 | +1 | +8 | -0.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 576 | 122 | 22 | 2 | 5 | 58 | 159 | 12 | 49 | 8 | 212 | 297 | 283 | 580 | 71 | 282 | 24 | 9 | 264 | 65 | -23 | +4 | -2 | +2 | +14 | -0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AATulsa Drillers · 251 PAwOBA .373 → .319 (−54)K% 16.3% → 19.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.33% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 19.93% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.75% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.968 | 8.64% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.59% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×0.968 | 1.34% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.46% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.968 | 28.48% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.75% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.050 | ×0.968 | 4.91% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.940 | ×1.050 | ×0.968 | 0.55% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.30% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.968 | 1.78% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .373 → .319; ISO .112 → .093; BABIP .376 → .346. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAAOklahoma City Comets · 50 PAwOBA .449 → .381 (−68)K% 10.0% → 12.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | — | — | 12.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.992 | 9.58% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×0.992 | 1.86% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.930 | — | ×0.992 | 23.06% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.992 | 9.15% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | — | ×0.992 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.56% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.992 | 3.86% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .449 → .381; ISO .244 → .193; BABIP .382 → .335. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKACL Dodgers · 27 PAwOBA .326 → .220 (−106)K% 18.5% → 26.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.52% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 26.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.940 | 6.48% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.70% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.940 | 2.51% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.22% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.940 | 17.13% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.940 | 7.52% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.940 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.940 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 19.5 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (8.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .326 → .220; ISO .087 → .057; BABIP .333 → .246. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AATulsa Drillers · 575 PAwOBA .296 → .245 (−51)K% 15.8% → 19.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.83% | ÷0.984 | ×1.220 | — | — | 19.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.91% | ÷1.061 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.978 | 8.97% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.22% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×0.978 | 1.04% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.78% | ÷0.968 | ×0.920 | ×1.000 | ×0.978 | 21.18% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.32% | ÷1.014 | ×0.840 | ×1.000 | ×0.978 | 4.31% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.137 | ×0.940 | ×1.000 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.51% | ÷0.957 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.978 | 0.41% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 94, 2B 103, 3B 127, K 97, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.000.
Result: wOBA .296 → .245; ISO .056 → .046; BABIP .281 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AATulsa Drillers · 547 PAwOBA .300 → .230 (−70)K% 25.2% → 32.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.23% | ÷0.959 | ×1.220 | — | — | 32.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.79% | ÷1.048 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.988 | 7.12% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.01% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×0.988 | 1.73% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.21% | ÷1.042 | ×0.920 | ×0.978 | ×0.988 | 19.81% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.33% | ÷1.003 | ×0.840 | ×0.978 | ×0.988 | 6.74% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.60% | ÷1.142 | ×0.940 | ×0.978 | ×0.988 | 0.47% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.19% | ÷1.063 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 0.88% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 113, 1B 108, 2B 101, 3B 128, K 92, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.
Result: wOBA .300 → .230; ISO .093 → .071; BABIP .323 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Great Lakes Loons · 545 PAwOBA .335 → .271 (−64)K% 20.6% → 26.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.55% | ÷1.004 | ×1.270 | — | — | 25.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.86% | ÷0.992 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 10.40% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.39% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.978 | 1.84% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.96% | ÷0.975 | ×0.920 | ×0.972 | ×0.978 | 20.59% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.34% | ÷1.011 | ×0.810 | ×0.972 | ×0.978 | 4.83% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.51% | ÷0.997 | ×0.850 | ×0.972 | ×0.978 | 1.22% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.11% | ÷0.951 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.978 | 1.74% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 95, 2B 102, 3B 99, K 101, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.972.
Result: wOBA .335 → .271; ISO .117 → .095; BABIP .309 → .266. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 137 PAwOBA .388 → .297 (−92)K% 18.2% → 26.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.25% | ÷0.930 | ×1.360 | — | — | 26.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 19.71% | ÷1.072 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 12.43% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.92% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 2.23% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.63% | ÷0.981 | ×0.920 | ×0.975 | ×0.980 | 26.56% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.94% | ÷0.923 | ×0.830 | ×0.975 | ×0.980 | 4.24% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.23% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×0.975 | ×0.980 | 0.93% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.47% | ÷1.247 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 1.55% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 96, 2B 85, 3B 130, K 86, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.975.
Result: wOBA .388 → .297; ISO .113 → .082; BABIP .367 → .322. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).