Eric Farris

Pos2B

B/TR/R

Born1986-03-03

Age (2027)41

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	27	AAAWSH	449	.248/.304/.312	3	23	53	—	.231/.270/.292
2014	28	AAA/INTL2 orgs	774	.289/.331/.367	7	26	77	—	.252/.279/.312
2015	29	AAA/INTL2 orgs	360	.252/.304/.303	1	5	55	—	.244/.280/.290

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2007	21	ROK	Helena Brewers	—	269	239	78	16	2	1	16	22	2	21	5	326	374	423	796	96	352	8	6	342	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	A	West Virginia Power	—	492	454	133	21	4	3	24	50	5	32	10	293	335	377	712	84	320	10	5	315	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	A+	Brevard County Manatees	—	534	473	141	18	1	7	29	46	3	70	6	298	343	385	727	87	317	9	5	310	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AAA	Nashville Sounds	—	249	230	63	9	1	2	9	25	4	14	2	274	313	348	661	74	299	10	4	292	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	ROK	AZL Brewers	—	35	32	8	5	0	1	1	3	0	1	0	250	273	500	773	250	233	9	3	315	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	INTL	Surprise Rafters	—	82	74	26	4	1	0	7	11	1	9	0	351	415	432	847	81	413	13	9	383	145	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AAA	Nashville Sounds	—	594	538	146	26	5	6	32	70	6	21	7	271	319	372	691	100	300	12	5	302	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA	Nashville Sounds	—	528	483	138	21	1	7	27	56	6	35	13	286	331	377	708	91	309	11	5	313	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	449	404	100	13	2	3	31	53	2	23	5	248	304	312	616	64	275	12	7	275	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	523	483	135	23	1	4	26	57	3	16	8	280	320	356	676	77	305	11	5	300	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	INTL	Mexico	—	251	230	71	8	1	3	13	27	3	10	3	309	354	391	745	83	335	11	5	330	109	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	323	297	77	10	1	1	19	39	2	5	2	259	308	310	618	51	293	12	6	279	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	INTL	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	37	33	6	2	0	0	2	6	2	0	1	182	270	242	513	61	222	16	5	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2007	21	ROK MLE	Helena Brewers	—	269	245	66	12	2	1	10	32	2	21	5	269	304	347	650	78	284	12	4	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	A MLE	West Virginia Power	—	492	462	121	17	4	2	16	67	5	32	10	262	294	329	623	67	292	14	3	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	A+ MLE	Brevard County Manatees	—	534	481	140	19	1	6	21	65	3	70	6	291	325	372	697	81	303	12	4	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	249	232	59	7	1	2	7	33	4	14	2	254	288	319	607	65	277	13	3	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	ROK MLE	AZL Brewers	—	35	32	7	4	0	1	1	4	0	1	0	219	242	438	680	219	166	11	3	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	594	545	139	22	4	5	25	87	6	21	7	255	295	338	633	83	282	15	4	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	528	490	127	19	1	6	20	71	6	35	13	259	297	339	635	80	279	13	4	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	449	415	96	12	2	3	20	64	2	23	5	231	270	292	562	60	256	14	4	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	523	493	124	19	1	3	16	69	3	16	8	252	279	312	592	61	275	13	3	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	323	303	74	9	1	1	13	46	2	5	2	244	280	290	570	46	276	14	4	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	21	ROK MLE	Helena Brewers	—	269	245	66	12	2	1	10	32	2	21	5	269	304	347	650	78	302	12	4	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	21	ROK RAW	Helena Brewers	—	269	239	78	16	2	1	16	22	2	21	5	326	374	423	796	96	352	8	6	342	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	A MLE	West Virginia Power	—	492	462	121	17	4	2	16	67	5	32	10	262	294	329	623	67	299	14	3	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	A RAW	West Virginia Power	—	492	454	133	21	4	3	24	50	5	32	10	293	335	377	712	84	320	10	5	315	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	A+ MLE	Brevard County Manatees	—	534	481	140	19	1	6	21	65	3	70	6	291	325	372	697	81	324	12	4	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	A+ RAW	Brevard County Manatees	—	534	473	141	18	1	7	29	46	3	70	6	298	343	385	727	87	317	9	5	310	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	366	344	83	14	1	3	9	48	5	24	2	241	271	314	585	73	270	13	2	256	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	366	336	97	18	2	3	17	39	5	24	2	289	332	381	713	92	316	11	5	314	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	594	545	139	22	4	5	25	87	6	21	7	255	295	338	633	83	293	15	4	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AAA RAW	Nashville Sounds	—	594	538	146	26	5	6	32	70	6	21	7	271	319	372	691	100	300	12	5	302	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	528	490	127	19	1	6	20	71	6	35	13	259	297	339	635	80	290	13	4	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA RAW	Nashville Sounds	—	528	483	138	21	1	7	27	56	6	35	13	286	331	377	708	91	309	11	5	313	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	449	415	96	12	2	3	20	64	2	23	5	231	270	292	562	60	263	14	4	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AAA RAW	Rochester Red Wings	—	449	404	100	13	2	3	31	53	2	23	5	248	304	312	616	64	275	12	7	275	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	774	729	184	27	2	5	23	101	6	26	11	252	281	316	597	63	283	13	3	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	774	713	206	31	2	7	39	84	6	26	11	289	331	367	699	79	315	11	5	309	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	360	336	82	10	1	1	15	51	4	5	3	244	285	289	573	45	283	14	4	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	360	330	83	12	1	1	21	45	4	5	3	252	304	303	607	52	287	12	6	275	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	21	ROK MLE	Helena Brewers	—	269	255	66	12	2	1	10	32	2	21	5	259	304	333	637	75	284	12	4	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	A MLE	West Virginia Power	—	492	468	121	17	4	2	16	67	5	32	10	259	294	325	619	66	292	14	3	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	A+ MLE	Brevard County Manatees	—	534	505	140	19	1	6	21	65	3	70	6	277	325	354	679	77	303	12	4	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	366	349	83	14	1	3	9	48	5	24	2	238	271	309	580	72	263	13	2	256	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	594	558	139	22	4	5	25	87	6	21	7	249	295	330	625	81	282	15	4	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	528	497	127	19	1	6	20	71	6	35	13	256	297	334	631	78	279	13	4	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	449	424	96	12	2	3	20	64	2	23	5	226	270	285	555	59	256	14	4	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	774	739	184	27	2	5	23	101	6	26	11	249	281	311	592	62	275	13	3	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	360	338	82	10	1	1	15	51	4	5	3	243	285	287	571	44	276	14	4	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	4366	4047	1038	152	18	32	159	586	39	257	62	256	291	327	618	70	290	13	4	266	66	-177	+27	-0	+16	+95	-4.1
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	603	155	23	3	5	24	87	6	38	9	257	293	330	623	73	290	13	4	266	66	-26	+4	-0	+2	+14	-0.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAARochester Red Wings · 323 PAwOBA .273 → .249 (−24)K% 12.1% → 14.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.07%	÷1.030	×1.200	—	—	14.07%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.88%	÷0.980	×0.690	—	×0.982	4.07%
HBP% /PA	0.62%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	0.57%
Singles /BIP	25.19%	÷0.979	×0.930	×1.023	×0.982	24.04%
Doubles /BIP	3.88%	÷0.987	×0.830	×1.023	×0.982	3.27%
Triples /BIP	0.39%	÷0.932	×0.970	×1.023	×0.982	0.41%
Home runs /BIP	0.39%	÷0.956	×0.840	—	×0.982	0.33%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 96, 2B 97, 3B 86, K 106, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.023.

Result: wOBA .273 → .249; ISO .051 → .045; BABIP .293 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAARochester Red Wings · 523 PAwOBA .296 → .258 (−37)K% 10.9% → 13.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.90%	÷1.002	×1.200	—	—	13.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.97%	÷1.125	×0.690	—	×0.992	3.02%
HBP% /PA	0.57%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	0.53%
Singles /BIP	25.12%	÷1.010	×0.930	×1.012	×0.992	23.22%
Doubles /BIP	5.40%	÷1.059	×0.830	×1.012	×0.992	4.25%
Triples /BIP	0.23%	÷0.900	×0.970	×1.012	×0.992	0.25%
Home runs /BIP	0.94%	÷1.075	×0.840	—	×0.992	0.73%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 115, 1B 102, 2B 112, 3B 80, K 100, BB 125 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.012.

Result: wOBA .296 → .258; ISO .077 → .063; BABIP .305 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAARochester Red Wings · 449 PAwOBA .270 → .246 (−24)K% 11.8% → 14.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.80%	÷0.987	×1.200	—	—	14.35%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.68%	÷1.026	×0.690	—	×1.003	4.51%
HBP% /PA	0.45%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	0.42%
Singles /BIP	23.36%	÷1.040	×0.930	×1.040	×1.003	21.79%
Doubles /BIP	3.70%	÷0.977	×0.830	×1.040	×1.003	3.28%
Triples /BIP	0.57%	÷0.900	×0.970	×1.040	×1.003	0.64%
Home runs /BIP	0.85%	÷0.938	×0.840	—	×1.003	0.77%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 108, 2B 95, 3B 80, K 97, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.040.

Result: wOBA .270 → .246; ISO .064 → .062; BABIP .275 → .256. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAANashville Sounds · 528 PAwOBA .307 → .271 (−36)K% 10.6% → 13.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.61%	÷1.024	×1.290	—	—	13.36%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.11%	÷1.003	×0.710	—	×1.018	3.68%
HBP% /PA	1.14%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	1.13%
Singles /BIP	25.53%	÷1.016	×0.900	×1.013	×1.018	23.32%
Doubles /BIP	4.92%	÷0.957	×0.810	×1.013	×1.018	4.29%
Triples /BIP	0.23%	÷0.938	×0.810	×1.013	×1.018	0.21%
Home runs /BIP	1.64%	÷1.022	×0.780	—	×1.018	1.27%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 103, 2B 91, 3B 88, K 105, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.013.

Result: wOBA .307 → .271; ISO .091 → .076; BABIP .309 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAANashville Sounds · 594 PAwOBA .296 → .271 (−25)K% 11.8% → 14.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.78%	÷1.035	×1.290	—	—	14.69%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.39%	÷0.950	×0.710	—	×1.033	4.16%
HBP% /PA	1.01%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	1.02%
Singles /BIP	23.29%	÷0.980	×0.900	×1.028	×1.033	22.70%
Doubles /BIP	5.56%	÷1.024	×0.810	×1.028	×1.033	4.67%
Triples /BIP	1.07%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.028	×1.033	0.80%
Home runs /BIP	1.28%	÷1.028	×0.780	—	×1.033	1.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 106, 1B 96, 2B 105, 3B 130, K 107, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.028.

Result: wOBA .296 → .271; ISO .100 → .082; BABIP .300 → .282. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AAANashville Sounds · 249 PAwOBA .285 → .259 (−26)K% 10.0% → 13.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.04%	÷0.991	×1.290	—	—	13.07%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.61%	÷0.989	×0.710	—	×1.048	2.72%
HBP% /PA	1.61%	—	×0.980	—	×1.048	1.65%
Singles /BIP	24.88%	÷1.009	×0.900	×1.017	×1.048	23.65%
Doubles /BIP	4.39%	÷1.089	×0.810	×1.017	×1.048	3.48%
Triples /BIP	0.49%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.017	×1.048	0.47%
Home runs /BIP	0.98%	÷0.943	×0.780	—	×1.048	0.85%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 102, 2B 118, 3B 80, K 98, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.017.

Result: wOBA .285 → .259; ISO .074 → .062; BABIP .299 → .277. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 ROKAZL Brewers · 35 PAwOBA .324 → .237 (−86)K% 8.6% → 12.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	8.57%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	12.34%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	2.86%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×0.955	1.69%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.720	—	×0.955	0.00%
Singles /BIP	6.90%	÷1.000	×0.820	—	×0.955	5.40%
Doubles /BIP	17.24%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.955	11.86%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.955	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	3.45%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.955	2.57%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 19.5 → −4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .324 → .237; ISO .250 → .184; BABIP .233 → .166. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 A+Brevard County Manatees · 534 PAwOBA .303 → .292 (−11)K% 8.6% → 12.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	8.61%	÷1.000	×1.420	—	—	12.23%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.24%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×0.998	3.92%
HBP% /PA	0.56%	—	×0.930	—	×0.998	0.52%
Singles /BIP	26.93%	÷1.000	×0.920	×1.040	×0.998	25.71%
Doubles /BIP	4.22%	÷1.000	×0.960	×1.040	×0.998	4.20%
Triples /BIP	0.23%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.040	×0.998	0.20%
Home runs /BIP	1.64%	÷1.000	×0.880	—	×0.998	1.44%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.040.

Result: wOBA .303 → .292; ISO .087 → .084; BABIP .317 → .303. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .