Wuilliams Rodriguez
P ACL Mariners| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20 | ROKSEA | 14 | 0 | 15 | 1.84 | 3.51 | 30.3% | 16.7% | — | K 20.6% · BB 20.8% · FIP 5.35 |
| 2025 | 21 | ROKSEA | 15 | 0 | 23 | 1.17 | 2.23 | 30.9% | 9.3% | — | K 21.0% · BB 11.6% · FIP 3.69 |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 16 | 0 | 34 | 2.94 | 5.21 | 31.2% | 13.6% | — | K 21.7% · BB 15.6% · FIP 7.51 |
| 2027PROJ | 23 | MLBSEA | — | — | 0 | 5.07 | 5.07 | 22.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 24 | MLBSEA | 10 | 0 | 10 | 4.87 | 4.79 | 23.2% | 12.3% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Mariners | 8 | 5 | 27 | 110 | 17 | 10 | 1 | 62% | 3.3 | 10.5% | 11.4% | -0.9% | 1.3% | 4.72 | 4.34 | — |
| 2022 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Mariners | 8 | 5 | 27 | 110 | 17 | 10 | 1 | 62% | 3.3 | 15.5% | 9.1% | 6.4% | 0.9% | 4.72 | 3.44 | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Mariners | 11 | 8 | 39 | 177 | 46 | 15 | 3 | 73% | 3.5 | 17.7% | 10.6% | 7.1% | 2.3% | 4.38 | 4.21 | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Mariners | 11 | 8 | 39 | 177 | 46 | 15 | 3 | 73% | 3.5 | 26.0% | 8.5% | 17.5% | 1.7% | 4.38 | 2.89 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK MLE | ACL Mariners | 14 | 0 | 15 | 66 | 20 | 11 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.6% | 20.8% | -0.2% | 2.5% | 1.84 | 5.35 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK MLE | ACL Mariners | 14 | 0 | 15 | 66 | 20 | 11 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.6% | 20.8% | -0.2% | 2.5% | 1.84 | 5.35 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK RAW | ACL Mariners | 14 | 0 | 15 | 66 | 20 | 11 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 30.3% | 16.7% | 13.6% | 1.5% | 1.84 | 3.51 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Mariners | 15 | 0 | 23 | 97 | 30 | 9 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 21.0% | 11.6% | 9.4% | 1.6% | 1.17 | 3.69 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Mariners | 15 | 0 | 23 | 97 | 30 | 9 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 21.0% | 11.6% | 9.4% | 1.6% | 1.17 | 3.69 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | ROK RAW | ACL Mariners | 15 | 0 | 23 | 97 | 30 | 9 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 30.9% | 9.3% | 21.6% | 1.0% | 1.17 | 2.23 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 0 | 34 | 154 | 48 | 21 | 8 | 0% | 2.1 | 21.7% | 15.6% | 6.1% | 7.8% | 2.94 | 7.51 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 0 | 34 | 154 | 48 | 21 | 8 | 0% | 2.1 | 21.7% | 15.6% | 6.1% | 7.8% | 2.94 | 7.51 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 16 | 0 | 34 | 154 | 48 | 21 | 8 | 0% | 2.1 | 31.2% | 13.6% | 17.5% | 5.2% | 2.94 | 5.21 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB | SEA | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.6% | 13.9% | 8.7% | 3.2% | 5.07 | 5.07 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | SEA | 23 | 0 | 24 | 103 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 12.3% | 10.9% | 3.1% | 4.87 | 4.79 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | SEA | 10 | 0 | 10 | 42 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.2% | 12.3% | 10.9% | 3.1% | 4.87 | 4.79 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 10 | 0 | 10 | 44 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.2% | 12.3% | 10.9% | 3.1% | 4.87 | 4.41 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 193 | 96 | 19 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 12.3% | 10.9% | 3.1% | 4.87 | 4.41 | +0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 64 | 13 | 137 | 604 | 110 | 80 | 21 | 20% | 2.1 | 18.3% | 13.3% | 5.0% | 3.4% | 3.28 | 5.12 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 93 | 19 | 200 | 882 | 161 | 117 | 30 | 20% | 2.1 | 18.3% | 13.3% | 5.0% | 3.4% | 3.28 | 5.12 | -0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKACL Mariners · 32 IPFIP 5.04 → 7.51 (+2.48)K% 31.9% → 21.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.94% | — | ×0.680 | 21.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.50% | — | ×1.250 | 15.62% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.56% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 7.78% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.04 → 7.51, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKACL Mariners · 23 IPFIP 2.23 → 3.69 (+1.46)K% 30.9% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.93% | — | ×0.680 | 21.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.28% | — | ×1.250 | 11.60% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.03% | ÷0.886 | ×1.400 | 1.63% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 77).
Result: FIP 2.23 → 3.69, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKACL Mariners · 15 IPFIP 3.48 → 5.35 (+1.86)K% 30.3% → 20.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.30% | — | ×0.680 | 20.61% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.67% | — | ×1.250 | 20.83% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.52% | ÷0.863 | ×1.400 | 2.46% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 73).
Result: FIP 3.48 → 5.35, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Mariners · 39 IPFIP 2.91 → 4.21 (+1.30)K% 26.0% → 17.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.99% | — | ×0.680 | 17.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.47% | — | ×1.250 | 10.59% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.69% | ÷1.034 | ×1.400 | 2.29% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 2.91 → 4.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL Mariners · 27 IPFIP 3.45 → 4.34 (+0.89)K% 15.5% → 10.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.45% | — | ×0.680 | 10.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×1.250 | 11.36% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.91% | ÷1.015 | ×1.400 | 1.25% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 3.45 → 4.34, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).