Easton Sikorski

P Chattanooga Lookouts

Age 27 RHP 6'0" / 210 lbs AA

Overview

AAPROSPECT

ETA2029MLB%2%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2024	24	A+CIN	26	1	67	3.90	3.65	19.9%	11.5%	—	K 15.3% · BB 13.2% · FIP 4.23
2025	25	MIX2 levels	35	0	63	3.71	3.45	27.2%	9.4%	—	K 21.1% · BB 10.6% · FIP 4.33
2026	26	AACIN	14	1	24	6.66	5.61	17.4%	6.4%	—	K 14.1% · BB 7.1% · FIP 6.43
2027PROJ	27	MLBCIN	1	0	1	4.94	4.94	18.1%	9.0%	-0.0
2028PROJ38% MLB	28	MLBCIN	16	0	17	4.93	4.97	18.5%	9.2%	-0.1
2029PROJ56% MLB	29	MLBCIN	21	0	22	4.98	5.05	18.6%	9.4%	-0.1

Next 3 projected WAR -0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Scouting grades · 20-80

Stuff55Control45Command60

Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 98%

CompsTyler Walker (age 28) · J.J. Putz (age 27) · Brett McKinney (age 26)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 127119vR 111

ERA4.94

FIP4.94

K%18.1%

BB%9.0%

K-BB%9.1%

Proj IP60

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 60 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

STUF5555

CTRL4545

CMD6060

K†4545

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2022	22	ROK MLE	ACL Reds	2	0	2	7	5	0	0	0%	1.0	71.4%	0.0%	71.4%	0.0%	0.00	-2.93	—
2022	22	ROK RAW	ACL Reds	2	0	2	7	5	0	0	0%	1.0	71.4%	0.0%	71.4%	0.0%	0.00	-1.90	—
2023	23	A MLE	Daytona Tortugas	17	0	29	117	33	14	3	0%	1.7	20.9%	14.1%	6.8%	3.1%	3.41	4.85	—
2023	23	A RAW	Daytona Tortugas	17	0	29	117	33	14	3	0%	1.7	28.2%	12.0%	16.2%	2.6%	3.41	3.62	—
2024	24	A+ MLE	Dayton Dragons	26	1	67	287	57	33	4	4%	2.6	15.3%	13.2%	2.1%	1.4%	3.90	4.23	—
2024	24	A+ MLE	Dayton Dragons	26	1	67	287	57	33	4	4%	2.6	15.3%	13.2%	2.1%	1.4%	3.90	4.23	—
2024	24	A+ RAW	Dayton Dragons	26	1	67	287	57	33	4	4%	2.6	19.9%	11.5%	8.4%	1.4%	3.90	3.65	—
2025	25	MIX MLE	2 levels	35	0	63	265	72	25	7	0%	1.8	21.1%	10.6%	10.5%	3.0%	3.71	4.33	—
2025	25	MIX MLE	2 levels	35	0	63	265	72	25	7	0%	1.8	21.1%	10.6%	10.5%	3.0%	3.71	4.33	—
2025	25	MIX RAW	2 levels	35	0	63	265	72	25	7	0%	1.8	27.2%	9.4%	17.7%	2.6%	3.71	3.45	—
2026	26	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	14	1	24	109	19	7	6	7%	1.7	14.1%	7.1%	7.1%	6.6%	6.66	6.43	—
2026	26	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	14	1	24	109	19	7	6	7%	1.7	14.1%	7.1%	7.1%	6.6%	6.66	6.43	—
2026	26	AA RAW	Chattanooga Lookouts	14	1	24	109	19	7	6	7%	1.7	17.4%	6.4%	11.0%	5.5%	6.66	5.61	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	27	MLB	CIN	1	0	1	4	1	0	0	0%	1.0	18.1%	9.0%	9.1%	3.4%	4.94	4.94	-0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	28	MLB MLE	CIN	44	0	46	193	36	18	7	0%	1.0	18.5%	9.2%	9.3%	3.4%	4.93	4.97	-0.2
2029	29	MLB MLE	CIN	37	0	39	164	30	15	6	0%	1.0	18.6%	9.4%	9.2%	3.5%	4.98	5.05	-0.2
2028	28	MLB CTX	CIN	16	0	17	72	13	7	2	0%	1.1	18.5%	9.2%	9.3%	3.4%	4.93	4.97	-0.1
2029	29	MLB CTX	CIN	21	0	22	93	17	9	3	0%	1.0	18.6%	9.4%	9.2%	3.5%	4.98	5.05	-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		37	0	39	164	30	15	6	0%	1.0	18.6%	9.3%	9.2%	3.5%	4.96	4.63	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	155	77	31	0%	1.1	18.6%	9.3%	9.2%	3.5%	4.96	4.63	-0.2
Career	—	MLE		94	2	185	785	145	90	23	2%	2.0	18.4%	11.5%	6.9%	2.9%	4.08	4.60	-0.4
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		101	2	200	847	156	98	25	2%	2.0	18.4%	11.5%	6.9%	2.9%	4.08	4.60	-1.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 24 IPFIP 5.46 → 6.43 (+0.97)K% 17.4% → 14.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	17.43%	—	×0.810	14.12%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	6.42%	—	×1.100	7.06%
HR / BF /BF	5.50%	÷1.000	×1.200	6.61%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 5.46 → 6.43, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 A+Dayton Dragons · 43 IPFIP 2.30 → 3.19 (+0.89)K% 32.6% → 25.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	32.57%	—	×0.770	25.08%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	8.00%	—	×1.150	9.20%
HR / BF /BF	1.71%	÷1.124	×1.250	1.91%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 125).

Result: FIP 2.30 → 3.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 20 IPFIP 5.68 → 6.53 (+0.85)K% 16.7% → 13.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	16.67%	—	×0.810	13.50%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	12.22%	—	×1.100	13.44%
HR / BF /BF	4.44%	÷1.021	×1.200	5.22%

Result: FIP 5.68 → 6.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 A+Dayton Dragons · 67 IPFIP 3.64 → 4.23 (+0.58)K% 19.9% → 15.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	19.86%	—	×0.770	15.29%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	11.50%	—	×1.150	13.22%
HR / BF /BF	1.39%	÷1.285	×1.250	1.36%

Result: FIP 3.64 → 4.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 ADaytona Tortugas · 29 IPFIP 3.64 → 4.85 (+1.21)K% 28.2% → 20.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	28.21%	—	×0.740	20.87%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	11.97%	—	×1.180	14.12%
HR / BF /BF	2.56%	÷1.060	×1.300	3.14%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).

Result: FIP 3.64 → 4.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Easton Sikorski (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.94	18.1%	9.0%	3.4%	—	5.01	18.5%	9.3%	84	+0.07	—	—	—
Tyler Walker R 2004 · 4.28 FIP	28	SU	4.28	17.5%	8.4%	2.9%	.311	3.77	18.5%	10.4%	101	-0.51	2.38	289	88
J.J. Putz R 2004 · 4.57 FIP	27	SU	4.57	17.1%	7.3%	3.6%	.283	2.58	28.5%	23.0%	210	-1.99	1.43	563	87
Brett McKinney R 2017 · 4.66 FIP	26	SU	4.66	18.5%	9.9%	3.4%	.287	—	—	—	—	—	3.43	183	86
Luis Mateo R 2017 · 4.60 FIP	27	SU	4.60	17.6%	11.2%	2.9%	.309	5.55	8.6%	-4.8%	43	+0.95	3.48	160	86
Ryan Doolittle R 2015 · 4.03 FIP	27	SU	4.03	15.1%	6.7%	2.5%	.315	4.38	13.9%	6.8%	44	+0.35	4.03	101	85
Troy Neiman R 2017 · 4.03 FIP	26	SU	4.03	18.1%	8.3%	2.5%	.282	—	—	—	—	—	4.03	199	85
Geoff Geary R 2004 · 4.85 FIP	27	SU	4.85	15.0%	6.5%	4.0%	.295	3.65	15.0%	9.5%	217	-1.20	3.16	345	85
Ricky Stone R 2002 · 4.16 FIP	27	SU	4.16	18.8%	9.3%	2.7%	.297	4.96	13.7%	7.4%	165	+0.80	4.16	243	84
Conor Steinbaugh R 2024 · 4.74 FIP	25	SU	4.74	16.0%	9.9%	3.2%	.281	6.29	15.0%	2.1%	44	+1.55	4.74	111	84
Woo-Suk Go R 2024 · 4.80 FIP	25	SU	4.80	17.3%	8.8%	3.7%	.359	4.16	21.5%	10.2%	64	-0.64	3.57	116	83
Hector Ambriz R 2010 · 5.07 FIP	26	SU	5.07	16.5%	7.1%	4.5%	.360	4.28	19.5%	10.8%	56	-0.79	2.24	259	83
Francisco Rodriguez R 2010 · 4.33 FIP	27	SU	4.33	17.2%	11.0%	2.4%	.283	5.00	11.9%	3.4%	14	+0.67	3.16	334	83
Mike Adams R 2022 · 5.36 FIP	27	SU	5.36	17.1%	11.2%	4.2%	.326	—	—	—	—	—	3.65	109	83
Jorge Reyes R 2015 · 4.58 FIP	27	SW	4.58	15.9%	8.5%	3.2%	.307	3.49	14.2%	6.2%	129	-1.09	3.39	227	82
Michael Dimock R 2017 · 4.12 FIP	27	SU	4.12	18.9%	7.8%	2.9%	.339	3.37	23.5%	12.8%	29	-0.75	3.08	166	82
Cody Tucker R 2024 · 4.97 FIP	25	SU	4.97	22.0%	12.0%	4.0%	.272	5.36	15.8%	-1.9%	40	+0.39	4.97	105	82
Aaron Kurcz R 2017 · 4.84 FIP	26	SU	4.84	15.4%	8.4%	3.6%	.301	3.97	26.2%	21.8%	50	-0.87	3.31	213	82
Ryan Middendorf R 2024 · 4.84 FIP	26	SU	4.84	19.1%	9.0%	4.0%	.293	4.41	12.7%	-1.1%	34	-0.43	1.27	164	82
Hueston Morrill R 2024 · 4.54 FIP	24	SU	4.54	19.8%	8.7%	3.7%	.302	3.24	19.0%	8.2%	54	-1.30	3.09	102	82
Andrew Robinson R 2015 · 3.77 FIP	27	SU	3.77	17.6%	6.3%	2.5%	.246	3.64	22.7%	14.4%	97	-0.13	3.19	160	82

Career Comps

Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.

Player	162s	IP/yr	K%	BB%	HR/9	ERA
OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION	0.7	48	18.3%	9.2%	1.33	4.95
Drew VerHagen ('23)	1.4	47	19.1%	9.4%	1.37	4.98
Sam Long ('25)	1.1	42	19.5%	9.7%	1.28	4.65
Bob Macdonald ('90-'96, 1 WAR*)	1.2	59	18.3%*	9.8%*	1.20*	4.32*
J. C. Gutierrez ('07-'14, -0 WAR*)	1.4	57	19.8%*	8.5%*	1.19*	4.72*
Randy St. Claire ('84-'94, -0 WAR*)	1.3	50	19.0%*	8.4%*	1.39*	4.61*
Kevin Hickey ('81-'91, 0 WAR*)	1.2	47	17.7%*	10.2%*	1.10*	4.27*