Logan Poteet

C Myrtle Beach Pelicans
Age 23 R/R 6'1" / 215 lbs A HR -8% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2037
Overview
APROSPECTMiLBFA 2038
OGV OFP40OGV rank#350ETA2029MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202521A+/INTL2 orgs37.167/.189/.306108—.118/.118/.294
202622A+/ACHC386.265/.377/.52821179—.196/.280/.377
2027PROJMLE23MLBCHC457.213/.292/.383165890.8
2028PROJ30% MLB24MLBCHC90.217/.295/.38631910.3
2029PROJ48% MLB25MLBCHC167.219/.297/.38961930.6
Next 3 projected WAR 1.7Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2037Service0.0First FA2038
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029MiLB2030MiLB2031MiLB2032Pre-Arb$0.9M2033Pre-Arb$0.9M2034Pre-Arb$1.0M+3
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 A+
ISO89
wOBA68
wRC+65
BB%52
Chase%33
Z-Con%22
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 98%
CompsKyle Wilson (age 23) · Marcos Castañon (age 24) · Michael McKenry (age 24)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONpark-neutral Marcel · 210 proj PA
wRC+†89
AVG/OBP/SLG.211 / .290 / .379
PA210
HR7
K%32
BB%9
ISO169
MLB%0%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -2.7 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-3BATRUN: -0.3 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)-0RUNFLD: +0.9 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+1FLDPOS: +3.8 runs (Positional adjustment)+4POSREP: +4.5 runs (Replacement-level credit)+5REPTotal WAR: +0.80+0.8WAR
0.00.51.00.30.60.80.90.80.70.50.20.127282930313233343536
━ projected WAR━ paid WAR ($/8M) surplus deficit+$35M ctrl surplus
Contract
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2032
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2037
First FA Year   2038
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2029MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2030MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2031MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2032Pre-Arb$0.9M+0.8$2M+$2M
2033Pre-Arb$0.9M+0.7$2M+$1M
2034Pre-Arb$1.0M+0.5$1M+$0.7M
2035Arb-1$1M+0.2$0.4M+$0.0M (cut)
2036Arb-2$0.7M+0.1$0.2M+$0.0M (cut)
2037Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $3M $6M +$4M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202521 A+South Bend Cubs — 1717 3001 080 00 176176353529 176250 470 229 -14 — — — — — —
202521 INTLMesa Solar Sox — 2019 3200 160 00 158200263463 105231 305 209 27 — — — — — —
202622 A+South Bend Cubs — 152133 341207 18530 00 256344504848 248365 3512 369 72 — — — — — —
202622 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans — 234191 528114 38742 10 272398545943 272358 3216 407 84 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202521 A+ MLESouth Bend Cubs — 1717 2001 0100 00 118118294412 176220 590 147 -14 — — — — — —
202622 A+ MLESouth Bend Cubs — 152138 27905 13670 00 196265370634 174321 449 274 72 — — — — — —
202622 A MLEMyrtle Beach Pelicans — 234204 406110 251012 10 196290382672 186298 4311 293 84 — — — — — —
202521 INTL MLE2 teams — 3737 4001 0210 00 108108189297 81200 570 147 -14 — — — — — —
202521 INTL RAW2 teams — 3736 6201 1140 00 167189306495 139238 383 218 -14 — — — — — —
202622 A MLE2 teams — 386342 6715115 381682 10 196280377657 181319 4410 286 79 — — — — — —
202622 A RAW2 teams — 386324 8620121 561272 10 265377528905 262361 3315 392 79 — — — — — —
202521 INTL MLE2 teams — 3737 4001 0210 00 108108189297 81220 570 147 -14 — — — — — —
202622 A MLE2 teams — 386343 6715115 381682 10 195280376656 181307 4410 286 79 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202521 INTL MLE2 teams — 3737 4001 0210 00 108108189297 81220 570 147 -14 — — — — — —
202622 A MLE2 teams — 386343 6715115 381682 10 195280376656 181307 4410 286 79 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202723 MLB MLECHC 0% 457409 8616216 421453 51 213292383675 169283 329 300 89 -6 +1 +2 +8 +10 0.8
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202824 MLB MLECHC 30% 294263 5711111 27922 31 216295387682 171284 319 303 91 -3 +0 +1 +5 +6 1.0
202925 MLB MLECHC 48% 348311 6813212 321072 31 218297389686 171285 319 305 93 -3 +0 +1 +6 +8 1.3
203026 MLB MLECHC 58% 377336 7414213 351143 31 219298390688 171285 309 306 93 -3 +0 +2 +7 +8 1.4
203127 MLB MLECHC 62% 390348 7714214 361173 31 219298388686 169284 309 305 93 -3 +0 +2 +7 +8 1.4
203228 MLB MLECHC 65% 391349 7614213 361173 21 219297385681 166284 309 303 91 -4 +0 +1 +7 +8 1.3
203329 MLB MLECHC 64% 383342 7514213 351153 21 216294378672 162282 309 300 89 -5 +0 +0 +7 +8 1.1
203430 MLB MLECHC 64% 374335 7013112 341142 12 213290370660 157280 309 295 86 -6 -1 -0 +7 +8 0.8
203531 MLB MLECHC 64% 342306 6412111 311052 22 209285360646 151276 319 289 82 -7 -0 -1 +6 +7 0.4
203632 MLB MLECHC 64% 303271 551019 27952 22 204279348627 144272 319 281 76 -8 -0 -2 +5 +7 0.1
202824 MLB CTXCHC 30% 9081 16303 8281 10 217295386682 169287 319 303 91 -1 +0 +0 +2 +2 0.3
202925 MLB CTXCHC 48% 167149 33616 15511 10 219297389686 170288 319 305 93 -1 +0 +1 +3 +4 0.6
203026 MLB CTXCHC 58% 220196 43818 20672 20 220298389688 169288 309 306 93 -2 +0 +1 +4 +5 0.8
203127 MLB CTXCHC 62% 242216 47918 22732 21 220298388686 167287 309 305 93 -2 +0 +1 +4 +5 0.9
203228 MLB CTXCHC 65% 253226 491018 23762 11 220298384681 164287 309 303 91 -3 -0 +1 +5 +5 0.8
203329 MLB CTXCHC 64% 247220 48918 23742 11 217295377672 160285 309 300 89 -3 -0 +0 +4 +5 0.7
203430 MLB CTXCHC 64% 240214 46917 22732 11 214291369660 155283 309 295 86 -4 -0 -0 +4 +5 0.5
203531 MLB CTXCHC 64% 219196 42817 20681 12 210286359645 150279 319 289 82 -5 -1 -1 +4 +5 0.2
203632 MLB CTXCHC 64% 194174 37716 17611 11 204280347626 142275 319 281 76 -5 -0 -1 +3 +4 0.1
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 18721672 36169861 17057114 117 216294376670 160286 319 299 87 -26 -1 +1 +33 +41 4.9
/ 162G— A+C — 650581 12524321 591985 42 215293375669 160285 309 299 87 -9 -0 +0 +12 +14 1.7
Career— MLE — 38353428 72713816131 350123225 2413 212290376666 164286 329 296 87 -47 -1 +4 +61 +74 9.4
/ 162G— MLE — 650581 12323322 592094 42 212289375664 164285 329 296 87 -9 -0 +1 +12 +14 1.8

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans · 234 PAwOBA .400 → .293 (−107)K% 31.6% → 43.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA31.62%÷1.000×1.360——43.01%
BB% (unintentional) /PA15.81%÷1.000×0.690—×0.99010.80%
HBP% /PA0.85%—×0.780—×0.9900.66%
Singles /BIP24.79%÷1.000×0.920×0.960×0.99021.68%
Doubles /BIP6.84%÷1.000×0.830×0.960×0.9905.39%
Triples /BIP0.85%÷1.000×0.910×0.960×0.9900.74%
Home runs /BIP11.97%÷1.000×0.800—×0.9909.48%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.960.

Result: wOBA .400 → .293; ISO .272 → .197; BABIP .358 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 A+South Bend Cubs · 152 PAwOBA .362 → .274 (−88)K% 34.9% → 44.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA34.87%÷1.000×1.270——44.28%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.84%÷1.000×0.710—×0.9988.39%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.790—×0.9980.00%
Singles /BIP18.75%÷1.000×0.920×1.031×0.99817.76%
Doubles /BIP15.00%÷1.000×0.810×1.031×0.99812.51%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.850×1.031×0.9980.00%
Home runs /BIP8.75%÷1.000×0.800—×0.9986.99%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.031.

Result: wOBA .362 → .274; ISO .248 → .181; BABIP .365 → .321. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 A+South Bend Cubs · 17 PAwOBA .221 → .147 (−74)K% 47.1% → 56.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA47.06%÷1.051×1.270——56.86%
BB% (unintentional) /PA0.00%÷1.042×0.710—×1.0120.00%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.790—×1.0120.00%
Singles /BIP22.22%÷1.021×0.920—×1.01220.26%
Doubles /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.810—×1.0120.00%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.850—×1.0120.00%
Home runs /BIP11.11%÷1.106×0.800—×1.0128.13%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 121, 1B 104, 2B 100, 3B 80, K 110, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .221 → .147; ISO .176 → .105; BABIP .250 → .220. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .