Larry Martinez
3B Charleston RiverDogs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | ROKTB | 176 | .295/.400/.369 | 0 | 3 | 70 | — | .239/.326/.290 |
| 2025 | 19 | ATB | 332 | .248/.299/.280 | 0 | 4 | 42 | — | .221/.266/.253 |
| 2026 | 20 | A+/ATB | 173 | .274/.296/.372 | 3 | 1 | 45 | — | .229/.248/.302 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBTB | 283 | .220/.250/.291 | 2 | 4 | 50 | -0.3 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 22 | MLBTB | 53 | .227/.260/.313 | 1 | 1 | 59 | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ48% MLB | 23 | MLBTB | 114 | .232/.267/.328 | 2 | 2 | 65 | -0.1 |
Tools · ContractCON 45 / POW 20
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 16 | ROK | DSL Tampa Bay | — | 85 | 74 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 243 | 341 | 284 | 625 | 41 | 286 | 13 | 11 | 296 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK | DSL Rays | — | 49 | 46 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 370 | 396 | 457 | 852 | 87 | 405 | 10 | 4 | 373 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 176 | 149 | 44 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 295 | 400 | 369 | 769 | 74 | 314 | 6 | 9 | 355 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 332 | 307 | 76 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 49 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 248 | 299 | 280 | 579 | 33 | 293 | 15 | 5 | 268 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A+ | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 74 | 68 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 206 | 229 | 279 | 508 | 74 | 271 | 27 | 1 | 217 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 99 | 96 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 323 | 343 | 438 | 781 | 115 | 392 | 20 | 2 | 348 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 16 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | — | 85 | 76 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 171 | 259 | 197 | 456 | 26 | 209 | 16 | 8 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 49 | 47 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 234 | 250 | 277 | 527 | 43 | 269 | 12 | 2 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 176 | 155 | 37 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 239 | 326 | 290 | 616 | 52 | 255 | 9 | 6 | 272 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 332 | 312 | 69 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 66 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 221 | 266 | 253 | 519 | 32 | 275 | 20 | 4 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A+ MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 74 | 68 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 191 | 214 | 265 | 479 | 74 | 240 | 35 | 1 | 180 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 99 | 97 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 258 | 273 | 330 | 603 | 72 | 357 | 27 | 1 | 276 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 16 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | — | 85 | 76 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 171 | 259 | 197 | 456 | 26 | 210 | 16 | 8 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 16 | ROK RAW | DSL Tampa Bay | — | 85 | 74 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 243 | 341 | 284 | 625 | 41 | 286 | 13 | 11 | 296 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 49 | 47 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 234 | 250 | 277 | 527 | 43 | 262 | 12 | 2 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays | — | 49 | 46 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 370 | 396 | 457 | 852 | 87 | 405 | 10 | 4 | 373 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 176 | 155 | 37 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 239 | 326 | 290 | 616 | 52 | 262 | 9 | 6 | 272 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | — | 176 | 149 | 44 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 295 | 400 | 369 | 769 | 74 | 314 | 6 | 9 | 355 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 332 | 312 | 69 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 66 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 221 | 266 | 253 | 519 | 32 | 279 | 20 | 4 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 332 | 307 | 76 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 49 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 248 | 299 | 280 | 579 | 33 | 293 | 15 | 5 | 268 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 173 | 165 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 53 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 224 | 243 | 291 | 534 | 67 | 315 | 31 | 1 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 173 | 164 | 45 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 274 | 296 | 372 | 668 | 98 | 344 | 23 | 2 | 292 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 16 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | — | 85 | 76 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 171 | 259 | 197 | 456 | 26 | 209 | 16 | 8 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 49 | 48 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 229 | 250 | 271 | 521 | 42 | 269 | 12 | 2 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 176 | 154 | 37 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 240 | 326 | 292 | 618 | 52 | 255 | 9 | 6 | 272 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 332 | 310 | 69 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 66 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 223 | 266 | 255 | 521 | 32 | 275 | 20 | 4 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 173 | 167 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 53 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 222 | 243 | 287 | 530 | 66 | 307 | 31 | 1 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 176 | 154 | 37 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 240 | 326 | 292 | 618 | 52 | 255 | 9 | 6 | 272 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 332 | 310 | 69 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 66 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 223 | 266 | 255 | 521 | 32 | 275 | 20 | 4 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 173 | 167 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 53 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 222 | 243 | 287 | 530 | 66 | 307 | 31 | 1 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | TB | 0% | 283 | 270 | 60 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 61 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 220 | 250 | 291 | 541 | 72 | 275 | 22 | 2 | 243 | 50 | -17 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +6 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | TB | 34% | 153 | 145 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 225 | 258 | 312 | 570 | 87 | 276 | 21 | 3 | 255 | 59 | -8 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +3 | -0.4 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB MLE | TB | 48% | 236 | 223 | 51 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 50 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 229 | 265 | 327 | 592 | 98 | 278 | 21 | 3 | 264 | 65 | -10 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +5 | -0.4 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB MLE | TB | 53% | 319 | 300 | 69 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 67 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 232 | 270 | 338 | 609 | 106 | 279 | 21 | 4 | 271 | 70 | -12 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +7 | -0.3 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB MLE | TB | 55% | 368 | 346 | 81 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 14 | 77 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 234 | 274 | 345 | 619 | 111 | 280 | 21 | 4 | 276 | 73 | -12 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +8 | -0.2 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB MLE | TB | 56% | 396 | 371 | 88 | 17 | 2 | 8 | 17 | 83 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 234 | 276 | 349 | 625 | 114 | 280 | 21 | 4 | 278 | 74 | -12 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +9 | -0.1 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB MLE | TB | 55% | 407 | 382 | 90 | 17 | 2 | 8 | 17 | 86 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 233 | 275 | 346 | 621 | 113 | 280 | 21 | 4 | 277 | 73 | -13 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +9 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | TB | 34% | 53 | 50 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 227 | 260 | 313 | 573 | 85 | 279 | 21 | 4 | 256 | 59 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB CTX | TB | 48% | 114 | 108 | 26 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 232 | 267 | 328 | 595 | 96 | 281 | 21 | 4 | 266 | 65 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +2 | -0.1 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB CTX | TB | 53% | 168 | 158 | 38 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 35 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 235 | 272 | 339 | 611 | 104 | 283 | 21 | 4 | 272 | 70 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +4 | -0.2 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB CTX | TB | 55% | 201 | 189 | 45 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 42 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 236 | 276 | 345 | 621 | 109 | 283 | 21 | 4 | 277 | 73 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +4 | -0.1 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB CTX | TB | 56% | 220 | 206 | 49 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 46 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 236 | 278 | 349 | 627 | 112 | 283 | 21 | 4 | 279 | 74 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +5 | -0.1 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB CTX | TB | 55% | 224 | 210 | 49 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 47 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 235 | 277 | 346 | 623 | 111 | 283 | 21 | 4 | 278 | 73 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +5 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 980 | 921 | 219 | 40 | 5 | 18 | 38 | 205 | 12 | 14 | 4 | 238 | 277 | 351 | 628 | 113 | 286 | 21 | 4 | 274 | 63 | -34 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +21 | -0.8 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 611 | 145 | 27 | 3 | 12 | 25 | 136 | 8 | 9 | 3 | 237 | 276 | 350 | 627 | 113 | 285 | 21 | 4 | 274 | 63 | -22 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2794 | 2618 | 600 | 107 | 10 | 36 | 108 | 571 | 46 | 36 | 9 | 229 | 272 | 319 | 591 | 90 | 279 | 20 | 4 | 262 | 63 | -72 | +3 | +0 | +7 | +43 | -1.9 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 609 | 139 | 25 | 2 | 8 | 25 | 133 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 228 | 271 | 315 | 587 | 87 | 278 | 20 | 4 | 262 | 63 | -24 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ACharleston RiverDogs · 99 PAwOBA .338 → .276 (−62)K% 20.2% → 27.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.20% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 27.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 2.02% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 1.41% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.01% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.80% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.58% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.997 | ×1.015 | 29.41% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.58% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.997 | ×1.015 | 5.53% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.997 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 2.14% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.
Result: wOBA .338 → .276; ISO .115 → .087; BABIP .392 → .357. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 74 PAwOBA .214 → .180 (−34)K% 27.0% → 35.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.310 | — | — | 35.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 1.35% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | — | ×1.027 | 0.83% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.35% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.027 | 1.07% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.870 | ×1.010 | ×1.027 | 20.69% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.17% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | ×1.010 | ×1.027 | 3.37% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.010 | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.027 | 1.88% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.010.
Result: wOBA .214 → .180; ISO .074 → .062; BABIP .271 → .240. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ACharleston RiverDogs · 332 PAwOBA .262 → .230 (−32)K% 14.8% → 20.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.76% | ÷1.006 | ×1.360 | — | — | 19.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.82% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 3.48% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.11% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 1.69% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.58% | ÷1.013 | ×0.920 | ×0.994 | ×1.030 | 23.78% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.88% | ÷0.850 | ×0.830 | ×0.994 | ×1.030 | 3.87% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.121 | ×0.910 | ×0.994 | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.159 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 103, 2B 70, 3B 124, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.994.
Result: wOBA .262 → .230; ISO .033 → .031; BABIP .293 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Rays · 176 PAwOBA .348 → .272 (−76)K% 5.7% → 8.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 5.68% | ÷0.980 | ×1.440 | — | — | 8.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.09% | ÷1.024 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 5.54% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.68% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 4.12% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.18% | ÷1.024 | ×0.820 | ×1.022 | ×1.008 | 20.77% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.04% | ÷0.941 | ×0.720 | ×1.022 | ×1.008 | 3.97% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.44% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | ×1.022 | ×1.008 | 0.93% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.002 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 105, 2B 88, 3B 130, K 96, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.
Result: wOBA .348 → .272; ISO .074 → .056; BABIP .314 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 DSLDSL Rays · 49 PAwOBA .371 → .248 (−122)K% 10.2% → 12.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.20% | ÷0.987 | ×1.220 | — | — | 12.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.08% | ÷0.984 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 2.93% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.71% | ÷1.005 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.008 | 21.62% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.76% | ÷0.993 | ×0.600 | — | ×1.008 | 5.94% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.035 | ×0.600 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.938 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 101, 2B 99, 3B 107, K 97, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .371 → .248; ISO .087 → .053; BABIP .405 → .269. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 DSLDSL Tampa Bay · 85 PAwOBA .289 → .211 (−79)K% 12.9% → 16.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.94% | ÷0.976 | ×1.220 | — | — | 16.17% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.59% | ÷0.985 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.022 | 7.69% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.35% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.022 | 1.68% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.81% | ÷0.981 | ×0.680 | ×1.050 | ×1.022 | 17.73% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.76% | ÷0.973 | ×0.600 | ×1.050 | ×1.022 | 3.15% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.919 | ×0.600 | ×1.050 | ×1.022 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.273 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.022 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 155, 1B 96, 2B 95, 3B 84, K 95, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 18.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .289 → .211; ISO .041 → .027; BABIP .286 → .209. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).